Hi,
After google online, some parts in the "puzzle" still missing. The best is to
find a simple example showing the whole process. Is there any example like
apache-uima/examples/descriptors/tutorial/ex3 RoomNumber and DateTime
integrated into solr? In particular, how to feed "text" into solr f
Momo,
if you have the conversion text to tokens then all you need to do is implement
a custom analyzer, deploy it inside the solr webapp, then plug it into the
schema.
Is that the part that is hard?
I thought the wiki was helpful there but may some other issue is holding you.
One zoology of suc
thank you for this information.
> Subject: Re: Implement Custom Soundex
> From: p...@hoplahup.net
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:58:49 +0200
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Momo,
>
> if you have the conversion text to tokens then all you need to do is
> implement a custom analyzer, deploy
I want to edit document filed in solr,for example edit the author name,so i
use the following code in solrj:
params.set("literal.author","anaconda")
but the author multivalued="true" in schema and because of that "anaconde"
is not replace with it's previous name and add to the end of the author
n
May someone explain me different use case when both or only one AutoCommit
parameters is filled ?
I really need to understand it.
For example with these configurations :
1
or
1000
or
1
1000
Thanks to everyone
--
View this message in context:
http://lucen
> The current grouping functionality using group.field is basically
> all-or-nothing: all documents will be grouped by the field value or none
> will. So there would be no way to, for example, collapse just the videos or
> images like they do in google.
When using the group.field option values must
Some work has been done in this general area, see SOLR-445. That
might give you some pointers
Best
Erick
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00 AM, samuele.mattiuzzo wrote:
> Hi all, as far as i know, when solr finds a faulty document (inside an xml
> containing let say 1000 docs) it skips the whole
Yes, stored fields are placed verbatim for every doc. But I wonder
at the utility of trying to share stored information. The stored
info is put in certain files in the index, see:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/fileformats.html#file-names
and the files that store data are pretty much irreleva
I'm not quite sure what you're asking, but the values returned for
documents to the client are the *stored* values, not the indexed
values. So your synonyms will never be returned as part of a
document.
Does that help?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:23 AM, cmd wrote:
> 1.use lucene to cre
Right, but consider the general case. You could potentially return every
document in your index in a single packet with this functionality. I suspect
that this is an edge case that you'll have to
1> implement the two-or-more query solution
2> write your own component that investigates the terms in
I think you need to back up and state the problem you're trying to
solve. Offhand, it looks as though you're trying to do something
with DIH that it wasn't intended to do. But that's just a guess
since the details of what you're trying to do are so sparse...
Best
Erick
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:
Hmmm dismax is, indeed, different. Note that dismax doesn't respect
the default operator at all, so don't be mislead there.
Could you paste the debug output for both the queries? Perhaps something
will jump out at us.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Hyttinen Lauri wrote:
> Thank yo
Just to chime in here... You will get different results
for "A B"~2 and "B A"~2. In the simple two-term case,
changing the order requires an extra move(s). There's
a very good explanation of this in Lucene In Action II.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Jason, Kim wrote:
> Which one is
In addition to Otis' suggestion, think about using multivalued fields
with an increment gap of,
say, 100 (assuming your accessories had less than 100 fields). Then
you can do proximity
searches with a size < 100 (e.g. "red swing"~90) would not match
across your multiple
entries
If this is clea
Think about using cores rather than instances if you really must
have this kind of separation. Otherwise you might have much
better luck combining these into a single index.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> Yes its same ,we have a base static schema and wherever
Solr Specification Version: 1.4.0
Solr Implementation Version: 1.4.0 833479 - grantingersoll - 2009-11-06
12:33:40
Lucene Specification Version: 2.9.1
Lucene Implementation Version: 2.9.1 832363 - 2009-11-03 04:37:25
precisionStep="6" positionIncrementGap="0"/>
stored="false" omitNorms="true"
I think the key here is you are a bit confused about what
the multiValued thing is all about. The fq clause says,
essentially, "restrict all my search results to the documents
where 1213206 occurs in sou_codeMetier.
That's *all* the fq clause does.
Now, by saying facet.field=sou_codeMetier you're
Hmmm, this is the Java forum, you might get a faster respons on the Solr .net
users list Especially since I don't find any reference to
SolrMultipleCriteriaQuery
in the Java 3.x code
Best
Erick
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Grüger, Joscha
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anybody know how to c
Also be aware that by default Solr is configured to only index the
first 10,000 lines
of text. See maxFieldLength in solrconfig.xml
Best
Erick
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Peter Spam wrote:
> Thanks for your note, Anand. What was the maximum chunk size for you? Could
> you post the releva
Have you seen this?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_boost_the_score_of_newer_documents
Best
Erick
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Craig Stadler wrote:
> Solr Specification Version: 1.4.0
> Solr Implementation Version: 1.4.0 833479 - grantingersoll - 2009-11-06
> 12:33:4
Yes I have and I cannot get it to work. Perhaps something is out of version
for my setup?
I tried for 3 hours to get ever example I could find to work.
- Original Message -
From: "Erick Erickson"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: Date boosting with dismax questi
You cannot update a single field in a document in Solr, you need to
replace the entire document. multiValued is irrelevant to this problem..
Or did I misunderstand your problem?
Best
Erick
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:32 PM, hadi wrote:
> I want to edit document filed in solr,for example edit the
A full commit of all pending documents is performed whenever
the first trigger is reached.
So, maxdocs = 1000. Max time=1 minute.
Index a packet with 999 docs. Index another packet with
50 documents immediately after. One commit of 1049 documents
happens
Index a packet of 999 docs. Do nothin
Define "not working". Show what you're getting and what you
expect to find. Show your data. Note that the example given
boosts on quite coarse dates, it *tends* to make documents
published in a particular *year* score higher.
You might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Er
Figured it out. See step 12 in
http://business.zimzaz.com/wordpress/2011/10/how-to-clone-wikipedia-mirror-and-index-wikipedia-with-solr/.
Thanks!
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I think you need to back up and state the problem you're trying to
> solve. Offhand, it look
Hi,
it seems from my limited experience thus far that as new data types are
added, schema.xml will tend to become bloated with many different field and
fieldtype definitions. Is this a problem in real life, and if so, what
strategies are used to address it?
FredZ
On Oct 23, 2011, at 19:34 , Fred Zimmerman wrote:
> it seems from my limited experience thus far that as new data types are
> added, schema.xml will tend to become bloated with many different field and
> fieldtype definitions. Is this a problem in real life, and if so, what
> strategies are used
Hi,
I've spent quite some time reading up on the query format and can't seem to
solve this problem:
1. If send solr the following query:
q={!lucene}profile_description:*
I get what I would expect.
2. If send solr the following query:
q=*:*
I get nothing just:
Would appreciate some
So, basically, yes, it is a real problem and there is no designed solution?
e.g. optional sub-schema files that can be turned off and on?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2011, at 19:34 , Fred Zimmerman wrote:
> > it seems from my limited experience thus far th
On Oct 23, 2011, at 20:23 , Fred Zimmerman wrote:
> So, basically, yes, it is a real problem and there is no designed solution?
Hmmm problem? Not terribly so, is it?
Certainly I'm more for a de-XMLification of configuration myself though. And
we probably should bake-in all the basic fi
Hi,
I am trying to comfigure solr on aws ubuntu instance.I have mysql on a
different server.so i created a ssh tunnel for mysql on port 3309.
Download the mysql jdbc driver and copied it to lib folder.
*I edited the example/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml*
data-config.xml
*example/solr/conf/da
> 2. If send solr the following query:
> q=*:*
>
> I get nothing just:
> name="response" numFound="0" start="0"
> maxScore="0.0"/> name="highlighting"/>
>
> Would appreciate some insight into what is going on.
If you are using dismax as query parser, then *:* won't function as match all
On 10/23/2011 09:34 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Hmmm dismax is, indeed, different. Note that dismax doesn't respect
the default operator at all, so don't be mislead there.
Could you paste the debug output for both the queries? Perhaps something
will jump out at us.
Best
Erick
Thank you Erick. I'
Hi Li Li,
Thanks for your detail explanation. Basically I have similar
implementation like yours. I just want to know if there is a better
and total solution. I'll keep trying and see if I have any improvement
that can share with you and the community.
Any idea or advice are welcome .
Floyd
2
34 matches
Mail list logo
