> How can I get random 100 record from last two days record
> from solr server.
>
> I am using solr 3.1
Hello, add this random field definition to you schema.xml
Generate some seed value ( e.g. 125) at query time,
and issue a query something like this:
q:add_date[NOW-2DAYS TO *]&sort=random_
Hi,
Thanks for the code, snippet, it was very useful, however, can you please
include a very small description of certain unknown variables such as
'groupedInfo', 'ResultItem', 'searcher', 'fields' and the method
'solrDocumentToResultItem'?
Thanks
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Kurt Sultana w
entdeveloper wrote:
>
> I'm using Solr trunk.
>
Hi!
I'm using solr 3.1.0 and the feature is not implemented.
When I search for a word with e.g. ~2 the "~2" is interpreted as part of the
search string.
Where can I get the trunk version? Is it a stable version or just for
testing purposes?
t
Hi,
we are running Solr 3.2.0 on Jetty for a web application. Since we just
went online and are still in beta tests, we don't have very much load on
our servers (indeed, they're currently much oversized for the current
usage), and our index size on file system ist just 1.1 MB.
We have one dedicat
optimize ensures that deleted docs and terms will not be displayed.
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Deleted-docs-in-IndexWriter-Cache-NRT-related-tp3177877p3178670.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
>i just wanna be clear in the concepts of core and shard ?
>a single core is an index with same schema , is this wat core really is ?
>can a single core contain two separate indexes with different schema in it
?
>Is a shard refers to a collection of index in a single physical machine
>?can a sin
Hi!
I would like to implement a fuzzy search with the Dismax Request Handler.
I noticed that there are some discussions about that, but all from the year
2009. (adding ~ in solrconfig)
Is it still at the same state or may be already implemented?
Is there another option to do fuzzy search with a d
> Hi!
> I would like to implement a fuzzy search with the Dismax
> Request Handler.
> I noticed that there are some discussions about that, but
> all from the year
> 2009. (adding ~ in solrconfig)
>
> Is it still at the same state or may be already
> implemented?
It is already implemented. https:
Hi all, I found a bug that exists in the 3.1 and in trunk, but not in 1.4.1
When I try to sort by a column with a colon in it like
"scores:rails_f", solr has cutoff the column name from the colon
forward so "scores:rails_f" becomes "scores"
To test, I inserted this doc:
In 1.4.1 I was able to
thanks for your answer!
I tried to add the following line to the solrconfig.xml file:
fieldName~0.8
Before adding the line I got 14 results for a request. After adding the line
(and restarting solr) I did the same request and changed just one letter of
the string. I was expecting that I have to g
> thanks for your answer!
>
> I tried to add the following line to the solrconfig.xml
> file:
> fieldName~0.8
>
> Before adding the line I got 14 results for a request.
> After adding the line
> (and restarting solr) I did the same request and changed
> just one letter of
> the string. I was expe
Seems to me that you wouldn't want to use a colon in a field name, since
the search syntax uses it (ie, to find a document with foo = bar, you
use foo:bar). I don't know whether that's actually prohibited, but that
could be your problem.
Nick
On 7/18/2011 8:10 AM, Jason Toy wrote:
Hi
I am using a fairly popular library (sunspot-solr for ruby) on top of solr
that introduces the use of a colon, so I will modify the library, but I
think there is still a bug as this stopped working in recent version of
solr. Solr should also not allow the data into the doc in the first place if
it
iorixxx wrote:
>
> What is your purpose of using it in pf parameter?
>
I don't know. I have seen it somewhere and i thought it has to be in the pf
parameter.
iorixxx wrote:
>
> edismax enables fuzzy search but you should use that tilde sing in q
> parameter.
>
I tried this in qf parameter (
Does anyone use XInclude? I'd like to hear about any successful usage at all.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
Hi!
I would like to announce the availability of Solr 3.3 with
RankingAlgorithm and Near Real Time (NRT) search capability now. The NRT
performance is very high, 10,000 documents/sec with the MBArtists 390k
index. The NRT functionality allows you to add documents without the
IndexSearchers be
On 7/17/2011 11:03 PM, pravesh wrote:
Hi,
SOLR has sharding feature, where we can distribute single search request
across shards; the results are collected,scored, and, then response is
generated.
Wanted to know, what happens in case of failure of specific shard(s),
suppose, one particular shar
Very glad to hear that NRT is finally here! But my question is this:
will things still come to a standstill during a commit?
Thanks...
Nick
I think everything you said is correct for static schemas, but a single core
does not necessarily have a unique schema since you can have dynamic
fields.
With dynamic fields, you can have multiple types of documents in the same
index (core), and a multiple types of indexed fields specific to indiv
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Nicholas Chase wrote:
> Very glad to hear that NRT is finally here! But my question is this: will
> things still come to a standstill during a commit?
New updates can now proceed in parallel with a commit, and
searches have always been completely asynchronous w.
In practice, in my experience at least, a very 'expensive' commit can
still slow down searches significantly, I think just due to CPU (or
i/o?) starvation. Not sure anything can be done about that. That's my
experience in Solr 1.4.1, but since searches have always been async with
commits, it p
> I tried this in qf parameter (fieldname~0.8^2) but have
> still the same
> problem: no results
Okey it is not qf nor pf. Just plain q parameter. q=test~0.8
iorixxx wrote:
>
> q=test~0.8
>
do you add ~0.8 in the query (http) or in the solrconfig.xml (like field~0.8)?
is "test" the fieldName or a search string?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Dismax-RequestHandler-adn-Fuzzy-Search-tp3178747p3179643.html
Sent
(11/07/18 23:35), Siddhesh Shirode wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I would like to know the best practices or best tools for Calculating QPS in
Solr. Thanks.
Just an FYI:
Admin GUI > STATISTICS > QUERY gives you avgRequestsPerSecond for each request
handler.
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
> >
> > q=test~0.8
> >
>
> do you add ~0.8 in the query (http) or in the
> solrconfig.xml (like name="q">field~0.8)?
mostly in the http.
> is "test" the fieldName or a search string?
search string. Do you have another use case?
I've written a blog post on some of the recent improvements that explains
things a bit:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/07/11/benchmarking-the-new-solr-%E2%80%98near-realtime%E2%80%99-improvements/
On Jul 18, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Nicholas Chase wrote:
> Very glad to hear that NRT is fin
Hey Nagendra - I don't mind seeing these external project announces here
(though you might keep Solr related announces off the Lucene user list), but
please word these announces so that users are not confused that this is an
Apache release, and that it is an external project built on top of Apac
I am trying to optimize performance of solr with our collection. The collection
has 208M records with index size of about 80GB. The machine has 16GB and I am
allocating about 14GB to solr.
I am using self join statement in filter query like this:
q=(general search term)
fq={!join from=join_field
: When I try to sort by a column with a colon in it like
: "scores:rails_f", solr has cutoff the column name from the colon
: forward so "scores:rails_f" becomes "scores"
Yes, this bug was recently reported against the 3.x line, but no fix has
yet been identified...
https://issues.apache.org/j
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Kanduru, Ajay (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C]
wrote:
> I am trying to optimize performance of solr with our collection. The
> collection has 208M records with index size of about 80GB. The machine has
> 16GB and I am allocating about 14GB to solr.
>
> I am using self join sta
I recently modified the DefaultSolrHighlighter to support external
fields, but is there a way to do this for solr itself? I'm looking to
store a field in an external store and give Solr access to that field.
Where in Solr would I do this?
I haven't seen any interest in this, but for anyone following, I
updated the alternateField logic to support pulling from the external
field if available. Would be useful to know how to get solr to use
this external field provider in general so we wouldn't have to modify
the highlighter at all, ju
Is there a way to specify the length of the text that should come back
from the highlighter? For instance I have a field that is 500k, I
want only the first 100 characters. I don't see anything like this
now, does it exist?
Solr version: 1.4.1
I'm having some trouble with certain queries run against my Solr
index. When a query starts with a single letter followed by a space,
followed by another search term, the query runs endlessly and never
comes back. An example problem query string...
/customer/select/?q=name%
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Timothy Tagge wrote:
> Solr version: 1.4.1
>
> I'm having some trouble with certain queries run against my Solr
> index. When a query starts with a single letter followed by a space,
> followed by another search term, the query runs endlessly and never
> comes ba
Is there a way to search for a specific string using Solr, either by putting it
in quotes or by some other means? I haven't been able to do this, but I may be
missing something.
Thanks,
Chip
OK I did what Hoss said, it only confirms I don't get a match when I
should and that the query parser is doing the expected. Here are the
details for one test sku.
My analysis page output is shown in my email starting this thread and
here is my query debug output. This absolutely should match bu
chip,
gonna need more information about your particular analysis chain,
content, and example searches to give a better answer, but phrase
queries (using quotes) are supported in both the standard and dismax
query parsers
that being said, lots of things may not match a person's idea of an
exact st
: It seems that the payloads are applied only to the original word that I
: index and the WordDelimiterFilter doesn't apply the payloads to the tokens
: it generates.
I believe you are correct. I think the general rule for most TokenFilters
that you will find in Lucene/Solr is that they don't t
: Works like a charm, but there is one problem, the maxrows attribute is set
: to 10, this means 10 results per page, but when you put several collections
: in the attribute, what it does is that adds 10 results per page per
: collections, so if a have 4 comma separeted collections the max rows fo
I found a weird behavior with the Solr defType argument, perhaps with
respect to default queries?
defType=dismax&q=*:* no hits
q={!defType=dismax}*:* hits
defType=dismax hits
Here is the request handler, which I explicitly indicate:
lucene
There are a few things here that i think you might be missunderstanding...
: function, but i read in solr book (Solr 1.4 enterprise search server by Eric
: Pugh and David Smiley) that "*scale will traverse the entire document set
: and evaluate the function to determine the smallest and largest va
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTerminology
: hi ,
:
: i just wanna be clear in the concepts of core and shard ?
:
: a single core is an index with same schema , is this wat core really is ?
:
: can a single core contain two separate indexes with different schema in it ?
:
: Is a shard re
Well, it all depends upon what you mean by "size" ...
This page http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/fileformats.html#file-names
explains what goes where in the files created by Lucene. The
point is that the raw text (i.e. *stored* data) is put in separate fles
from the indexed (i.e. searched) data
This is a really cryptic problem statement.
you might want to review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Brandon Fish wrote:
> Does anyone know of any existing examples of importing data from a queue
> into Solr?
>
> Thank you.
>
Please provide some more context here, there's nothing
really to go on. It might help to review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Ruixiang Zhang wrote:
> Hi
>
> It seems that solr does not index a row when some column of this row has
> NU
Read my thread " RE: Analysis page output vs. actually getting search
matches, a discrepancy?" and see if it is not somewhat like your
problem... even if not, there might be something to help as to how to
figure out what is going on in your case...
-Original Message-
From: deniz [mailto:de
Deniz:
Can you create a self-contained test case that illustrates the problem?
In reality, I suspect that you're doing something ever-so-slightly different,
didn't remove your index between tests, whatever (I know I've gotten
myself completely messed up after working on something for hours!).
Mak
: I see this post:
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/including-external-files-in-config-by-corename-td698324.html
: that implies you can use #xpointer(/*/node()) to get all elements of
: the root node (like if I changed my example to only have one include,
: and just used multiple files, which
Measure. On an index with your real data with real queries ...
Being a smart-aleck aside, using something like jMeter is useful. The
basic idea is that you can use such a tool to fire queries at a Solr
index, configuring it with some number of threads that all run
in parallel, and keep upping the
Does hl.fragsize work in your case?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Is there a way to specify the length of the text that should come back
> from the highlighter? For instance I have a field that is 500k, I
> want only the first 100 characters. I don't see an
: I saw this in the Solr wiki : "An un-optimized index is going to be *at
: least* 10% slower for un-cached queries."
: Is this still true? I read somewhere that recent versions of Lucene where
: less sensitive to un-ptimized indexed than is the past...
correct. I've removed that specific statem
Hmmm, is there any chance that you're stemming one place and
not the other?
And I infer from your output that your default search field is
"moreWords", is that true and expected?
You might use luke or the TermsComponent to see what's actually in
the index, I'm going to guess that you'll find "ster
What are qf_dismax and pf_dismax? They are meaningless to
Solr. Try adding &debugQuery=on to your URL and you'll
see the parsed query, which helps a lot here
If you change these to the proper dismax values (qf and pf)
you'll get beter results. As it is, I think you'll see output like:
+() ()
Easiest way to count QPS:
Take one solr log file. Make it have date stamps and log entries on
the same line.
Grab all lines with 'qTime='.
Strip these lines of all text after the timestamp.
Run this Unix program to get counts in line of how many times each
timestamp appears in a row:
uniq -c
Thanks Pravesh! But this is NRT related so commit is not called to
update a document. The documents added are available for searches
immediately after update and commit is not needed. A commit may be
scheduled once in about 15 mins or as needed.
Regards,
- Nagendra Nagarajayya
http://solr-ra.
From one of the users of NRT, their system was freezing with commits at
about 1.5 million docs due to the frequency of commits but with NRT
(Solr with RankingAlgorithm) update document performance and a commit
interval of about 15 mins they no longer have the freeze problem.
Regards,
- Nagen
Thanks Mark! I made the earlier implementation of NRT with 1.4.1
available to Solr through a JIRA issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2568
( I had made available the implementation details through a paper
published at
http://solr-ra.tgels.com/papers/NRT_Solr_RankingAlgorithm.pdf
maybe you can read http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin
2011/7/19 Ahmet Arslan
> > >
> > > q=test~0.8
> > >
> >
> > do you add ~0.8 in the query (http) or in the
> > solrconfig.xml (like > name="q">field~0.8)?
>
> mostly in the http.
>
> > is "test" the fieldName or a search string?
How does one search for the term "google+" with solr? I noticed on twitter I
can search for google+: http://search.twitter.com/search?q=google%2B (which
uses lucene, not sure about solr) but searching on my copy of solr, I can't
search for google+
--
- sent from my mobile
6176064373
"google+" or google\+
--
Best wishes
James Bond Fang
方 振鹏
Dept. Software Engineering
Xiamen University
-- Original --
From: "Jason Toy";
Date: 2011年7月19日(星期二) 上午10:28
To: "solr-user";
Subject: searching for google+
H
Hi,
I am wondering how could I get solr cache running status. I know there is a
JMX containing those information.
Just want to know what tool or method do you make use of to monitor cache,
in order to enhance performance or detect issue.
Thanks a lot
Kun
Thanx Shawn,
>When I first set things up, I was using SOLR-1537 on Solr 1.5-dev. By
>the time I went into production, I had abandoned that idea and rolled
>out a stock 1.4.1 index with two complete server chains, each with 7
>shards.
So, Both 2 chains were configured under cluster in load bala
This might be of some help:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJmx http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJmx
Thanx
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-could-I-monitor-solr-cache-tp3181317p3181407.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.c
dismax does not work with a=*:*
defType=dismax&q=*:* no hits
You need to switch this to:
defType=dismax&q.alt=*:* no hits
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> What are qf_dismax and pf_dismax? They are meaningless to
> Solr. Try adding &debugQuery=on to your U
> I am wondering how could I get solr cache running status. I
> know there is a
> JMX containing those information.
>
> Just want to know what tool or method do you make use of to
> monitor cache,
> in order to enhance performance or detect issue.
You might find this interesting :
http://semate
Hi all,
I have a performance issue~
I do a optimize on solr master every night.
but about a month ago, every time after the slaves get the new
optimized index, system cpu usage will raise from 0.3 - 0.5% to 7 -
10% (daily average), and servers's load average also become 2 times
more than normal.t
67 matches
Mail list logo
