try this mail list
http://docs.jquery.com/Discussion
or this doc
http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.each/
On 21 June 2011 07:32, Romi wrote:
> Hi, for enabling highlighting i want to parse json object. for readilibility
> i included xml format of that json object. please tell me how should i parse
> t
I don't quite follow, I must admit. Maybe it's faceting you're after?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview
Staszek
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:40, nilay@gmail.com wrote:
> Can you please tell me how can i apply filter in cluster data in Solr ?
>
> Currently i storing docid and
I use solr 4 trunk to index some sites with nutch 1-2-rc4. When i try to
index 300k documents with solr4 i get error.
But when i use solr 1.4.1 version there is no problem like that. I install
solr4 to tomcat5,6 jetty7,8 there is no change.
I use apache-solr-core-1.4.0.jar apache-solr-solrj-1.
Hi Bill,
yes, you absolutely do make sense. I posted the exact same question to this
mailing list (subject: faceting on multivalued fields), but got no response
out of it. A friend of mine is now helping out.
I hope someone on the list can give us some advice. I'll post our findings
to this topic
Can your front end app normalize the q parameter. Either with a drop
down or a type a head derived from the values in the specialties
field. that way q will match value(s) in your facet results. I'm not
sure what you are trying to achieve though so maybe i'm off the mark.
On 22 June 2011 04:37,
Oh sorry forgot to also type:
Often facet fields are not stemmed or heavily analysed. The facet
values are from the index.
On 22 June 2011 08:21, lee carroll wrote:
> Can your front end app normalize the q parameter. Either with a drop
> down or a type a head derived from the values in the speci
Am 22.06.2011 05:37, schrieb Bill Bell:
> It can get more complicated. Here is another example:
>
> q=cardiology&defType=dismax&qf=specialties
>
>
> (Cardiology and cardiologist are stems)...
>
> But I don't really know which value in Cardiologist match perfectly.
>
> Again, I only want it to
Hi,
Iam using solr collapse, it is working perfectly with default sorting
(score), when we give the more than fileld in sort with pagination, it
through incorrect result.
Could any one help to solve this?.
Thanks in advance...
Regards
Thalaiselvam N
--
View this message in context:
http://l
Here is an example using exampledocs and trunk 4.0:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=cat:%22hard%20drive%22&version=2.2&sta
rt=0&rows=10&indent=on&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.query={!lucene}cat:
%22hard%20drive%22&facet.mincount=1
Results:
Etc
2
2
2
Notice that the fa
You can type q=cardiology and match on cardiologist. If stemming did not
work you can just add a synonym:
cardiology,cardiologist
But that is not the issue. The issue is around multiValue fields and
facets. You would expect a user
Who is searching on the multiValued field to match on some values
Hi Bill, can you explain a little bit more around why you need this.
Knowing the motivation
might suggest a different solution not just involving faceting.
On 22 June 2011 08:49, Bill Bell wrote:
> You can type q=cardiology and match on cardiologist. If stemming did not
> work you can just add
Hi Bill,
as far as I understood now, with the help of my friend, you can't.
Multivalued fields don't work that way.
You can however always filter the facet results manually in the JSP. You
knwo what the user chose as a facet.
The issue I ran into is when you have additional facet fields. For exam
Am 22.06.2011 09:49, schrieb Bill Bell:
> You can type q=cardiology and match on cardiologist. If stemming did not
> work you can just add a synonym:
>
> cardiology,cardiologist
Okay, synonyms are the only way I can think of a realistic match.
Stemming won't work on a facet field; you wouldn't g
Hi guys,
I am getting some doubts about how to correctly understand the debugQuery
output. I have a field named itemName in my index. This is a text field,
just that. When I quqery a simple ?q=itemName:iPad , I end up with the
following query result.
Simply trying to understand why these strings
Hi,
I also have this issue with Solr 3.2.0. It is probably this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381
Tom
On 06/15/2011 02:09 PM, Mark Cunningham wrote:
Hi,
If you submit information to solr using xml, does the server assume you're
using unicode encoded in utf8? And does it accept
Using solr search when i search for rin* it run wildcard query and i get the
result for ring but when i search for Rin* it run spellchecker and then
gives the result for ring. why so ?? please explain
-
Thanks & Regards
Romi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/
Wildcard queries are not analyzed. Lowercase your query beforehand.
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 14:08:48 Romi wrote:
> Using solr search when i search for rin* it run wildcard query and i get
> the result for ring but when i search for Rin* it run spellchecker and
> then gives the result for ring. w
Hi Chris ,Andreas
I have upgraded to solr 3.2 ... everything seems fine now. I will have to
integrate this to my application and observe if any further issues...again
thanks for your patience and time...
--Surendra
Hi Bill,
>So that part works. Then when I output the facet, I need a different
>behavior than the default. I need
>The facet to only output the value that matches (scored) - NOT ALL VALUES
>in the multiValued field.
>I think it makes sense?
Why do you need this ? If your use case is faceted navi
*
*
I am using this fieldtype and applied these filters. for wildcard searches
do i n
I am running two solrShards. I have indexed 100 million docs in each shard (
each are 50 GB and only 'id' is stored).
My search have became very slow. Its taking around 2-3 seconds.
below is my query :
http://solrHost1:8080/solr/select?shards=solrHost1:8080/solr,solrHost2:8080/solr&q=
QUERY&fq=Fil
No, wildcard queries are not analyzed. They are not _passed_ through your
analyzers. If you lowercase at index-time, you must lowercase it outside of
Solr before sending a query.
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 14:35:12 Romi wrote:
> *
>
>
>
> words="stopwords.txt"/>
>
Hi Lee,
since I have the same problem, I might as well try to answer this question.
You want this behaviour to make things clear for your users. If they select
cardiologists, does it make sense to also show family doctors as a
facetvalue to the user.
The same thing goed for the facets that are re
how can I lowercase query outside of Solr before sending a query?
-
Thanks & Regards
Romi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conflict-in-wildcard-query-and-spellchecker-in-solr-search-tp3095198p3095345.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nab
Hi are you using synonyms ?
On 22 June 2011 10:30, Alexander Ramos Jardim
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am getting some doubts about how to correctly understand the debugQuery
> output. I have a field named itemName in my index. This is a text field,
> just that. When I quqery a simple ?q=itemName:iP
On 06/22/2011 04:01 AM, Dennis de Boer wrote:
Hi Bill,
as far as I understood now, with the help of my friend, you can't.
Multivalued fields don't work that way.
You can however always filter the facet results manually in the JSP. You
knwo what the user chose as a facet.
Yes - that is the m
Mattmann, Chris A (388J jpl.nasa.gov> writes:
>
> Hi Jo,
>
> You may consider checking out Tika trunk, where we recently have a Tika JAX-RS
web service [1] committed as
> part of the tika-server module. You could probably wire DIH into it and
accomplish the same thing.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> I am running two solrShards. I have
> indexed 100 million docs in each shard (
> each are 50 GB and only 'id' is stored).
> My search have became very slow. Its taking around 2-3
> seconds.
> below is my query :
>
> http://solrHost1:8080/solr/select?shards=solrHost1:8080/solr,solrHost2:8080/solr
Hi Dennis,
I think maybe I just disagree. Your not showing facet counts for
cardiologists and Family Doctors independently. The Family Doctor
count will be all Family Doctors who are also Cardiologists.
This allows users to further filter Cardiologists who are also family
Doctors. (this could be
Well, the use case is rather simple. It is not a use case but more auser
experience.
If I have a list of values I can facet on, for example :
A
B
C
D
E
And I click on B, does it make sense for the user to display
B
C
E
after the selection ? Just because items in B are C and E items as well?
As A
this is how my 'time' field looks in schema :
and also, I am doing frequent Update to Solr (every 5 minuts).
On 22 June 2011 18:41, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > I am running two solrShards. I have
> > indexed 100 million docs in each shard (
> > each are 50 GB and only 'id' is stored).
> > My sear
Hi, Bill (and others).
I post this for what it's worth - it's a very specialized resolution we wrote
to a similar requirement that may help with your (and similar) requirements.
Caveats abound [1]
We're running 3.1.
We wanted to be able to return facets which matched on our actual search,
rat
Glad it worked out!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 22, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Surendra wrote:
> Hi Chris ,Andreas
>
> I have upgraded to solr 3.2 ... everything seems fine now. I will have to
> integrate this to my application and observe if any further issues...again
> thanks for your patience and time...
>
Thanks for your answers Erick & Mohammad!
I'll get back to the list if I have more specific info about this issue, so
far the index is performing normally again.
Best,
Santiago
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, that is odd, anyone else want to chime in here?
>
> But
Hi,
Today's checkout (Solr Specification Version: 3.4.0.2011.06.22.16.10.08)
produces the exception below on start up. The same exception with very similar
strack trace comes when committing and add. Example schema and docs will
reproduce the error.
Jun 22, 2011 4:11:57 PM org.apache.solr.com
While trying some synonyms.txt files I noticed a huge increase of heap usage.
synonyms_1.txt --> 6645 lines (2826104 bytes in size)
results in 66364 entries in SynonymMap with 730MB heap usage.
Startup time about 2 minutes.
synonyms_2.txt --> 6645 lines (5384884 bytes in size)
results in 115168
Koji,
the Description on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#CREATE is:
*quote*
If a core with the same name exists, while the "new" created core is
initalizing, the "old" one will continue to accept requests. Once it
has finished, all new request will go to the "new" core, and the "old"
core w
Dear all,
Kindly help me..
thanks
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 11:46 AM, Jonty Rhods wrote:
I am using solrj to index the data. I have around 5 docs indexed. As at
the time of commit due to lock server stop giving response so I was
calculating commit time:
double starttemp = System.currentTime
Hi Pravesh,
Thanks for your reply. I tried both the approaches-
Commit fails with this exception-
Exception in thread "main" org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Severe
errors in solr configuration. Check your log files for more detailed
information on what may be wrong. If you want solr to c
Hi Tod,
On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:00 AM, Tod wrote:
>> Mattmann, Chris A (388J jpl.nasa.gov> writes:
>>
Hi Jo,
You may consider checking out Tika trunk, where we recently have a Tika
JAX-RS
>> web service [1] committed as
part of the tika-server module. You could pr
We always remove the facet filter when faceting: in other words, for a
good user experience, you generally want to show facets based on the
query excluding any restriction based on the facets.
So in your example (facet B selected), we would continue to show *all*
facets. Only if you performed a
Stefan,
> I guess, same handling for other actions, like rename.
I agree. Thank you for the pointer!
koji
(11/06/22 23:16), Stefan Matheis wrote:
Koji,
the Description on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#CREATE is:
*quote*
If a core with the same name exists, while the "new" created co
Hi !
We are using Zend Search based on Lucene. Our indexing pdf consultations
take longer than 2 seconds.
We want to change to solr to try to solve this problem.
i. Can anyone tell me the response time for querys on pdf documents on solr?
ii. Can anyone tell me some strategies to reduce
any help on this would be really appreciated.
i just setup a totally brand new setup of solr & still got this exception ..
I can see that this would be something to do with classpath, but not able to
figure out exactly what is causing this issue.
-- karthik
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:23 PM, karth
Hi!
I would like to announce the availability of Solr 3.2 with
RankingAlgorithm. Please download and give the new version a try. This
version of RankingAlgorithm exposes a lucene compatible api so almost
all of the Solr features should work as it is.
Note:
NRT support will be available by ne
Yeah, I see your points. It's complicated. I'm not sure either.
But the thing is:
> in order to use a feature like that you'd have to really think hard
about
> the query analysis of your fields, and which ones will produce which
> tokens in which situations
You need to think really hard about
Karthik,
could you attach/pastebin your schema and also the text you're trying
to analyze?
Regards
Stefan
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:29 PM, karthik wrote:
> any help on this would be really appreciated.
>
> i just setup a totally brand new setup of solr & still got this exception ..
> I can see
How is that different from doing a field search and just counting the
results?
If you only want the facet of the searched term (input), then why not just
combine that with the result count and use that?
Facets are more useful when you _don't_ know the distribution of values
across a result set b
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Bernd Fehling
wrote:
> While trying some synonyms.txt files I noticed a huge increase of heap
> usage.
>
> synonyms_1.txt --> 6645 lines (2826104 bytes in size)
> results in 66364 entries in SynonymMap with 730MB heap usage.
> Startup time about 2 minutes.
>
> syn
I once tried to load wordnet synsets as a synonym file and it was
prohibitively slow and unusable. fyi.
On 06/22/2011 12:23 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Bernd Fehling
wrote:
While trying some synonyms.txt files I noticed a huge increase of heap
usage.
synonyms_1.
Okay, so since you put "cardiologist" in the 'q', you only want facet
values that have 'cardiologist' (or 'Cardiologist') to show in up the
facet list.
In general, there's no good way to do that.
But.
If you want to do some client-side processing before you submit the
query to Solr, and on t
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Bernd Fehling
> wrote:
> > While trying some synonyms.txt files I noticed a huge increase
> of heap
> > usage.
> >
> > synonyms_1.txt --> 6645 lines (2826104 bytes in size)
> > results in 66364 entries in SynonymMap with 730MB heap usage.
> > Startup time abou
Hi Rode,
Have you seen http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors ?
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Rode González (libnova) [mailto:r...@libnova.es]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:30 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: dan...@silvereme.com; Gonzalo Iglesias; Leo; M
Thanks for offering to help Stefan.
I just resolved the issue. It was some crazy thing within Tomcat (I still
need to find out what it was). I just backed up my old tomcat installation &
just created a new instance of tomcat & deployed my solr installation in
there & everything started working fin
Yeah, I agree with that last statement.
It seems to me that the use case where it _might_ matter is where
you have a query for MORE than one.
q=cardiologist OR family
and in that case, it MIGHT be useful to separate the facets
in a XOR sense where you don't get cross-pollution. But
the original
An interesting live scenario for this matter:
http://www.bondfaro.com.br/ (brazilian site)
The query "ipad" returns results spread across many categories (links
on the left, teasers in the center). The "Tablet" category (facet) is
one of them.
The query "tablet" does exactly the same as clicking
I just tried branch_3x and couldn't reproduce this.
Looks like maybe there is something wrong with your build, or some old
class files left over somewhere being picked up.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Today's checkout
I am trying to use sorting by the termfreq function using the trunk code
since termfreq was added in the 4.0 code base.
I run this query:
http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/select/?q=librarian&sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,librarian)%20desc
but I get:
HTTP ERROR 500
Problem accessing /solr/select/. Reaso
Thanks for the problem report. It turns out we didn't check for a
null pointer when there were no terms in a field for a segment.
I've just committed a fix to trunk.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jason Toy wrote:
> I am trying to use sorting by the t
Was your searches always slow, OR, since you did some changes at
index/config/schema level?
Is it due to 5-mins index updation? Are you warming ur searches?
Thanx
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-is-taking-long-long-time-tp3095306p3098552.html
Se
Hi,
At the query time, I want to make the lucene query such that it should boost
only the noun from the query or some concept existing in the index. Are
there any possibilities or any possible ideas that can be worked around?
Regards,
Pooja
What would you mean by 'noun or some concept'. Would be better if you could
give a rather concrete example.
About detecting parts of speech, you could use a lot of libraries but I
didn't get about boosting terms from the Index.
--
Anshum Gupta
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at
Hi,
Say for example, a query like "mammohan singh dancing", I am preferring to
make a compulsory condition on nouns to be searched but any verb isnt
important for me, I am preferring to extract results for manmohan singh and
not for dancing. If I can extract noun verb or can get to know that in my
Pooja,
You could use UIMA (or any other) Parts of Speech Tagger. You could read a
little more about it here.
http://uima.apache.org/downloads/sandbox/hmmTaggerUsersGuide/hmmTaggerUsersGuide.html#sandbox.tagger.annotatorDescriptor
This would help you annotate and segregate nouns from verbs in the i
Did you do manual copy of index from Master to Slave of servers. I suppose,
it won't be copied properly.
If this is the case, then you can check the size of indexes on both servers.
Otherwise, you would've to recreate the indexes.
Thanx
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4720
Hi Pravesh,
I was just indexing some documents remotely on a single node instance
when the connection broke.
So, there isn't any manual copy that I did.
I think I will go ahead and re-index. Just curious to know, if there
is any option to specify the check-point for last commit and rollback
to it
66 matches
Mail list logo
