Hi,
I am running the solr index and post indexing I get these results, how can I
know which documents failed and why?
1
5170850
0
2011-05-08 23:40:09
Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 2972300 documents. Deleted 0
documents.
2011-05-09 00:13:48
2011-05-09 00:13:48
2972300
2198550
0:33:40.945
Run
Hi,
Is that possible that solr on tomcat on windows 2008 is using only one core of
processor? Do I need configure something to use more cores?
Best Regards,
Solr_Beginner
Hello.
You should be able to get the current document that you want to update,
change your notes value with the new ones to be added bye the user, and then
make and update petition to Solr to delete the old document (findable by the
id that you include in the POST petition) and add the new documen
Hallo everyone,
i'm using solr-multicore with 3 cores to index my Web-Site. For testing i'm
using the solr-admin GUI to get responses. The Problem is, that i get
results only from one core, but not from the others also. Each core has its
own schema.xml.
The Cores are like follow structured:
/mul
yea you can use solr on tomcat, i am doing the same actually... but have no
idea about multiple cores tho...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/tomcat-and-multicore-processors-tp2917973p2918015.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benyahya, Fahd wrote:
> Hallo everyone,
>
> i'm using solr-multicore with 3 cores to index my Web-Site. For testing i'm
> using the solr-admin GUI to get responses. The Problem is, that i get
> results only from one core, but not from the others also.
[...]
What do
Thanks Koji for opening that, the dynamicField mapping is a commonly used
feature especially for named entities mapping.
Tommaso
2011/5/7 Koji Sekiguchi
> I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2503 .
>
> Koji
> --
> http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
>
> (11/05/06 20:15), Koji Sekiguch
Hi,
sorry that I did not so well explained my issue.
That is exactly as you described it(* Or, is it that queries are working on
one core, and not on the
other?)
Regards,
Fahd
On 9 May 2011 10:58, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benyahya, Fahd
> wrote:
> > Hallo everyo
If the schema is different across cores , you can query across the cores
only for those fields that are common.
Querying across all cores for some query paramterer and gettin result set in
one output xml can be achieved by shards
http://localhost:8090/solr1&indent=on&q=*:*&shards=localhost:8090/so
I just attempted to set up an instance of Solr 3.1 in Tomcat 5.5 running
in Java 1.5. It fails with the following exception on start-up:
> java.lang.AssertionError: Analyzer implementation classes or at least their
> tokenStream() and reusableTokenStream() implementations must be final at
> org
Hi,
I'm using the "old" 1.3 Solr version on one of my sites and I decided to add
a highlighting feature. Unfortunately I can not get it to work. I'm doing
some testing in the Sorl admin interface without much luck. Below is some
information that describes the problem.
I would like to highlight te
thanks for all those who have answered my questions.
But i still not understanding, why i cannot sent queries for each core own
and get results only form the core who has quired.
At first i'm not intersting to get resultes for all cores in one xml output
. to do that i need to make a distributed
On 09.05.11 11:04, Martin Jansen wrote:
> I just attempted to set up an instance of Solr 3.1 in Tomcat 5.5 running
> in Java 1.5. It fails with the following exception on start-up:
>
>> java.lang.AssertionError: Analyzer implementation classes or at least their
>> tokenStream() and reusableToken
Hi All!
Can Anybody tell me how to exclude the count of similar
results( obtained from morelikethis ) from total facet count.
Thanks in Advance!
Isha Garg
Whether your field text is stored or not? Highlighting works with stored
fields of schema only.
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2918299.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Can you provide more detail about your required aliasing.
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/aliasing-tp2917733p2918303.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I understand now. I become the raw content of the field because is "stored".
The filtered content is in the response not visible. I can only see this in
the analysis view. Ok now :)
I will try to move the StopFilter under the WordDelimeter.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucen
First you need to find your logs. That folder should not
be empty regardless of whether DIH is working correctly
or not.
I'm assuming here that you're just doing the "java -jar star.jar"
in the example directory, if this isn't the case how are you
starting Solr/Jetty?
Best
Erick
On Mon, May 9, 2
There's not much information to go on here. Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Benyahya, Fahd wrote:
> thanks for all those who have answered my questions.
> But i still not understanding, why i cannot sent queries for each c
Hi Erick,
Thats exactly how I am starting solr.
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 May 2011 16:57
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Total Documents Failed : How to find out why
First you need to find your logs. Th
Hi, I would like to write my own filter. I try to use the following class:
public class MyFilter extends TokenFilter {
private String myField
public SemanticQueryExpansionFilter(TokenStream input, myFiled)
{
super(input);
this.myField = my
Hi Grijesh,
The field text is stored and yet it is not working.
Kind regards,
Nick
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2918518.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello Robert,
At my company, we are working on a generic log collector that uses Solr
to provide search capabilities.
What the collector does basically is this (this is greatly dumbed down !) :
* collect a log line (read it from a file, receive it from the network,
... )
* parse it through a
Thanks Tommaso! I'm glad to hear from the person with experience.
I'll commit shortly.
Koji
(11/05/09 17:57), Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Thanks Koji for opening that, the dynamicField mapping is a commonly used
feature especially for named entities mapping.
Tommaso
2011/5/7 Koji Sekiguchi
I've o
I'm indexing content from a CMS' database of metadata. The client would
prefer that Solr exclude the properties (metadata) of any documents
being indexed. Is there a way to tell Tika to only index a document's
text and not its properties?
Thanks - Tod
Hi Chris ,
I did try what you suggested, but I am not getting the expected results. The
code is given below,
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
query.set("q","apple");
query.set("facet","true");
query.set("facet.range", "create
Hello Mr. Bell,
Thank you very much for patiently responding to my
questions. We optimize once in every 2 days. Can you kindly rephrase
your answer, I could not understand - "if the amount of time if > 10
segments, I believe that might also trigger a whole index, since you
cycled
Hello All,
I am planning to upgrade from Solr 1.4.1 to Solr 3.1. I
saw some deprecation warnings in the log as shown below
[#|2011-05-09T12:37:18.762-0400|WARNING|sun-appserver9.1|org.apache.solr.analysis.BaseTokenStreamFactory|_ThreadID=53;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-9001-13
;_Re
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:07 AM, solrfan wrote:
> Hi, I would like to write my own filter. I try to use the following class:
> But this is a problem for me. The one-to-one mapping. I want to map a given
> Token, for example "a" to three Tokens "a1", "a2", "a3". I want to do a
> one-to-one mapping t
I would like to be able to disable the synonym filter during runtime based on
a query parameter, say 'synoynms=true' or 'synonyms=false'.
Is there a way within the AnaylzerQueryNodeProcessor or QParser that I can
remove the SynonymFilter from the AnalyzerAttributes?
It seems that the Analyzer h
Hi all,
Is it possible to set up solr so that it will only execute dataimport
commands if they come from localhost?
Right now, my application and my solr installation are on different servers
so any requests are formatted http://domain:8983 instead of
http://localhost:8983. I am concerned that wh
Solr does not provide security (I believe Lucid EnterpriseWorks has
something there).
You should keep Solr itself secure behind a firewall, and pass all
requests through some intermediary that only allows sensible stuff
through to Solr itself. That way, the DataImportHandler is accessible
inside y
Hi
I am using solr with liferay till Friday everything was good but today I
added few documents but I am unable to search some of them L.
It is showing 0 result(s) are found.
Waiting for your help.
Thanks,
anil misra
248-880-4948
REPOST as a more general question about ivy dependencies:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5941789/do-ivy-dependency-revisions-have-anything-to-do-with-svns
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
wrote:
> I think you are talking about this dependency:
>
> conf="*->default" />
>
> I
Just make another field using copyfield which the other field does not
apply synonyms to the text and then search either the one with or
without from the front end... that will be your selector. :)
-Original Message-
From: mtraynham [mailto:mtrayn...@digitalsmiths.com]
Sent: Monday, May
Awesome thanks! Also, you wouldn't happen to have any insight on boosting
synonyms lower than the original query after they were stemmed, would you?
Say if I had synonyms turned on:
The TokenStream is setup to do Synonyms -> StopFilter -> LowerCaseFilter ->
SnowballPorter.
Say I search for Thom
Actually now that I think about it, with copy fields I can just single out
the Synonym reader and boost from an earlier processor.
Thanks again though, that solved a lot of headache!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Synonym-Filter-disable-at-query-time-tp291987
Hi,
You can simply configure a firewall on your Solr server to only allow access
from your frontend server. Whether you use the built-in software firewall of
Linux/Windows/Whatever or use some other FW utility is a choice you need to
make. This is by design - you should never ever expose your b
I was thinking search both and boost non-synonym field perhaps?
-Original Message-
From: mtraynham [mailto:mtrayn...@digitalsmiths.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 1:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Synonym Filter disable at query time
Awesome thanks! Also, you wouldn't
Yay! :)
-Original Message-
From: mtraynham [mailto:mtrayn...@digitalsmiths.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 1:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Synonym Filter disable at query time
Actually now that I think about it, with copy fields I can just single
out
the Synonym re
Hello,
I am using the new SOLR 3.1 for a 2.6 Gb, 1MM documents index. Reading the
forums and the archive I learned that SOLR and Lucene now manage commits and
transactions a bit differently than in previous versions, and indeed I feel
the behavior has changed.
Here's the thing: committing a few 1
Is it a formal feature that solr 3.1 support? Or still as experimental
feature? If it is experimental feature, i would still be hesitating to use
it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/edismax-available-in-solr-3-1-tp2910613p2920975.html
Sent from the Solr - Use
well... if i knew what to do about aliasing, i wouldnt post my question here
Grijesh :) My idea is this: for some search queries, I need to provide some
synonyms...
But it is just an idea...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/aliasing-tp2917733p2921305.html
Sent f
I am trying to use two different data sources as in the title. The problem is
that it fails each time i try... I tried the stuff on SolrWiki but it
failed.
anyone knows how to configure solr for using two different types of sources,
DB and URL?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472
well second time i have fixed the issue on my own after posting here
but i dont understand why indexing time increased to 16 mins, while it was
only 2 mins with only db source... confused
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-DB-dataSource-and-a-URL-Data-source-
We are looking for some recommendations around systematically re-indexing in
Solr an ever growing corpus of documents (tens of millions now, hundreds of
millions in than a year) without taking the currently running index down.
Re-indexing is needed on a periodic bases because:
- New features ar
There doesn't seem to be API to add a group (like group.field or group=true).
I'm very new to this so I'm wondering how I'd go about adding a group query
much like how I use 'addFilterQuery' to add an fq. Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrQuery-AP
a lot of this stuff is covered in the tutorial, and expanded in the
wiki. still the best places to start in figuring out the fundamentals:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
hth,
rc
On Mon,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:24 AM, deniz wrote:
> well second time i have fixed the issue on my own after posting here
>
> but i dont understand why indexing time increased to 16 mins, while it was
> only 2 mins with only db source... confused
[...]
Try timing just the URLDataSource. We had the sam
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Misra, Anil wrote:
[...]
> I am using solr with liferay till Friday everything was good but today I
> added few documents but I am unable to search some of them L.
[...]
We are not mind-readers, so it is hard to tell what went wrong
without any details from your
50 matches
Mail list logo
