Hello.
How can i set the timezone oft java in my java properties ?
my problem is, that in the dataimport-properties is a wrong timezone and i
dont know how to set the correct timezone ... !?!? thx
-
--- System
One Server,
Vishal,
i don't really understand what you're trying to achieve? indexing what
(complete/sample documents, valid if possible)? And getting what
exactly as result?
Regards
Stefan
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:01 PM, vrpar...@gmail.com wrote:
> hello ,
>
> i am using Xpathentityprocessor to do index
java -Duser.timezone=UTC -jar start.jar ?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:54 AM, stockii wrote:
> Hello.
>
> How can i set the timezone oft java in my java properties ?
>
> my problem is, that in the dataimport-properties is a wrong timezone and i
> dont know how to set the correct timezone ... !?!? th
Hi,
I'm new to solr. My solr instance version is:
Solr Specification Version: 3.1.0
Solr Implementation Version: 3.1.0 1085815 - grantingersoll - 2011-03-26
18:00:07
Lucene Specification Version: 3.1.0
Lucene Implementation Version: 3.1.0 1085809 - 2011-03-26 18:06:58
Current Time: Tue Apr 26 08:
What do you have in solrconfig.xml for luceneMatchVersion?
If you don't set this, then its going to default to "Lucene 2.9"
emulation so that old solr 1.4 configs work the same way. I tried your
example and it worked fine here, and I'm guessing this is probably
whats happening.
the default in the
Sorry, but there's too much here to debug remotely. I strongly advise you
back wy up. Undo (but save) all your changes. Start by doing
the simplest thing you can, just get a dummy class in place and
get it called. Perhaps create a really dumb logger method that
opens a text file, writes a messa
Thank you very much for answer.
You were right. There was no luceneMatchVersion in solrconfig.xml of our dev
core. We thought that values not present in core configuration are copied
from main solrconfig.xml. I will investigate if our administrators did
something wrong during upgrade to 3.1.
On T
Thanks Stefan
currently in dataconfig file part of xPathEntityProcessor
and when i do make search i get following search result
CustomerA
AnyC
1
Hi,
I'm reading solr cache documentation -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching I found there "The current
Index Searcher serves requests and when a new searcher is opened...".
Could you explain when new searcher is opened? Does it have something
to do with index commit?
Best Regards,
Solr Beg
Hi!
We've got one index splitted into 4 shards á 70.000 records of large
full-text data from (very dirty) OCR. Thus we got a lot of "unique" terms.
No we try to obtain the first 400 most common words for "CommonGramsFilter"
via TermsComponent but the request runs allways out of memory. The VM is
Hello,
i got following source
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
'org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler' at
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.findClass(SolrResourceLoader.java:389)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.createInstance(SolrCore.java:423) at
or
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/04/01/solr-powered-isfdb-part-8/
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:34 PM, vrpar...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i got following source
>
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
> 'org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler' at
> org
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> But somehow this feels bad (well, so does sticking word variations in what's
> supposed to be a synonyms file), partly because it means that the person
> adding
> new synonyms would need to know what they stem to (or always check it aga
Hello,
I have a problem with the whitespaceTokenizer and scoring. An example:
id Titel
1 Manchester united
2 Manchester
With the whitespaceTokenizer "Manchester united" will be splitted to
"Manchester" and "united". When
i search for
Don't know your use case, but if you just want a list of the 400 most common
words you can use the lucene contrib. HighFreqTerms.java with the - t flag.
You have to point it at your lucene index. You also probably don't want Solr
to be running and want to give the JVM running HighFreqTerms a l
I'm trying to tokenize email and IP addresses using
StandardTokenizerFactory.
It does correctly tokenize IP address but it divides email address into two
tokens one with value before '@' and the other with value after that.
It works correctly under Solr 1.4.1
Has anybody else tried similar thin
Hi Wodek,
UAX29URLEmailTokenizer includes all of StandardTokenizer's rules and adds rules
to tokenize URLs and Emails:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.UAX29URLEmailTokenizerFactory
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Wodek Siebor [mailto:siebor_wlo...@ba
Hi, all.
Sorry for any duplication - seems like what I sent yesterday never made it
through...
We're having some troubles with the Solr Spellcheck Response. We're running
version 3.1.
Overview: If we search for something really ugly like:
"kljhklsdjahfkljsdhf book rck"
then wh
Hi
Someone told me that ebay is using solr.
I was looking at their Auto Suggest implementation and I guess they are
using Shingles and the TermsComponent.
I managed to get a satisfactory implementation but I have a problem with
category specific filtering.
Ebay suggestions are sensitive to catego
I'm just starting with Solr. I'm using Solr 3.1.0, and I want to use
EmbeddedSolrServer with a multicore setup, even though I currently have only
one core (various documents I read suggest starting that way even if you have
one core, to get the better administrative tools supported by mutlicore
Thanks for your suggestion. It seems to be the use of shards and
TermsComponent together. Now we simple requesting shard-by-shard without
"shard" and "shard.qt" params and merge the results via XSLT.
Sebastian
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/TermsCompo
You're on the right track. In a system where the indexing process and
search process are on the same machine, commits by the index
process cause a new searcher to opened.
In a master/slave situation (assuming you are indexing on the
master and searching on the slave), then the searchers are
reopen
First, you can give us some more data to work with ...
In particular, attach &debugQuery=on to your http request and post
the results. That will show how the documents got their score.
Also, show us the definition and definition for the field
in question.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10
I am sure that this question has been asked a few times, but I can't seem to
find the sweetspot for indexing.
I have about 100,000 files each containing 1,000 xml documents ready to be
posted to Solr. My desire is to have it index as quickly as possible and then
once completed the daily stream
Suppose your analysis stack includes lower-casing, but your synonyms are
only supposed to apply to upper-case tokens. For example, "PET" might
be a synonym of "positron emission tomography", but "pet" wouldn't be.
-Mike
On 04/26/2011 09:51 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:24
Mike, thanks a lot for your example: the idea here would be you would
put the lowercasefilter after the synonymfilter, and then you get this
exact flexibility?
e.g.
WhitespaceTokenizer
SynonymFilter -> no lowercasing of tokens are done as it "analyzes"
your synonyms with just the tokenizer
LowerCa
I experienced the same issue. With Solr 1.x, I was copying out the
'example' directory to make my solr installation. However, for the
Solr 3.x distributions, the DataImportHandler class exists in a
directory that is at the same level as example: "dist", not a
directory within.
You'll either want t
OK this is even more weird... everything is working much better except
for one thing: I was testing use cases with our top query terms to make
sure the below query settings wouldn't break any existing behavior, and
got this most unusual result. The analyzer stack completely eliminated
the word McA
Hi,
If you run your query with debugQuery=true you will see the explanation about
how Lucene/Solr went about scoring your 2 docs. If you can't figure out what's
going on from there, send the relevant part to the list, along with the parsed
query (which you can also see from debugQuery=true out
Hi,
Yes, typically after your index has been replicated from master to a slave a
commit will be issued and the new searcher will be opened. Before being
exposed
to regular clients it's a good practice to warm things up.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucen
Yes, I see. Makes sense. It is a bit hard to see a "bad" case for your
proposal in that light. Here is one other example; I'm not sure whether
it presents difficulties or not, and may be a bit contrived, but hey,
food for thought at least:
Say you have set up synonyms between names and commo
Hi Eric,
Before using the terms component, allow me to point out:
* http://sematext.com/products/autocomplete/index.html (used on
http://search-lucene.com/ for example)
* http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Suggester
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem
So if there is a hit in the synonym filter factory, do I need to put the
various case changes for a term so that the following
WordDelimiterFilter analyzer can do its 'split on case changes' work?
Here we see SynonymFilterFactory makes all terms lowercase because this
is what is in my synonmyms.txt
Charlie,
How's this:
* -Xmx2g
* ramBufferSizeMB 512
* mergeFactor 10 (default, but you could up it to 20, 30, if ulimit -n allows)
* ignore/delete maxBufferedDocs - not used if you ran ramBufferSizeMB
* use SolrStreamingUpdateServer (with params matching your number of CPU cores)
or send batches
Hi Robert,
I'm no WDFF expert, but all these zero look suspicious:
org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory {preserveOriginal=0,
generateNumberParts=0, catenateWords=0, generateWordParts=0,
catenateAll=0, catenateNumbers=0}
A quick visit to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokeni
Yeah I am about to try turning one on at a time and see what happens. I
had a meeting so couldn't do it yet... (darn those meetings) (lol)
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:37 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.or
Hi,
I was wondering if solr open a new lucene IndexReader for every query
request?
>From performance point of view, is there any problem of opening a lot of
IndexReaders concurrently, or application shall have some logic to reuse the
same IndexReader?
Thanks,
cy
--
View this message in
Hi,
I¹ve been using solr with Coldfusion9, I¹ve made a couple of adjustment to
it in order to fulfill my needs of my client, I¹m using solr as a document
search engine for a online library which has documents larger then 20MB and
some of them have more than 20 pages.
The thing is that... At firs
Yes, order does matter. You're right, putting, say, lowercase in front
of WordDelimiter... will mess up the operations of WDFF.
The admin/analysis page is *extremely* useful for understanding what
happens in the analysis of input. Make sure to check the "verbose"
checkbox.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Ap
I second Otis' comments. Is it possible that you've gotten twisted
around by trying to modify these settings and would be better off
going back to the WDDF settings in the example schema? I've
sometimes found that to be very useful.
Also (although I don't think it applies in this case) be aware th
See below
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:15 PM, cyang2010 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if solr open a new lucene IndexReader for every query
> request?
>
no, absolutely not. Solr only opens a reader when the underlying index
has changed, say a commit or a replication happens.
> From performance p
Just pushing up the topic and look for answers.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Too-many-open-files-exception-related-to-solrj-getServer-too-often-tp2808718p2867976.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks a lot. That makes sense. -- CY
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reader-per-query-request-tp2867778p2867995.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
But in this case lowercase is after WDF. The question is that when you get a
hit in the SynonymFilter on a synonym and where the entries in synonmyms.txt
file are all in lower case do I need to add the case changing versions to make
WDF work on case changes because it appears the synonym text i
(11/04/27 7:35), Alejandro Delgadillo wrote:
Hi,
I¹ve been using solr with Coldfusion9, I¹ve made a couple of adjustment to
it in order to fulfill my needs of my client, I¹m using solr as a document
search engine for a online library which has documents larger then 20MB and
some of them have mo
Thank you Otis.
Without trying to appear to stupid, when you refer to having the params
matching your # of CPU cores, you are talking about the # of threads I can
spawn with the StreamingUpdateSolrServer object?
Up until now, I have been just utilizing post.sh or post.jar. Are these capable
of t
Ahhh, I mis-read your post..
First, it's not the synonymfilterfactory that's lowercasing anything. The
ingorecase="true" affects the matching, not the output. The output is
probably lowercased because you have it that way in the synonyms.txt
file. At least that's what I just saw using the analysis
Hello all,
I am trying to build an autocomplete solution for a website that I run. The
current implementation of it is going to be used on who you want to send
PM's too. I have it basically working up to this point, The UI is done and
the suggester is working in returning possible solutions withou
My schema: id, name, checksum, body, notes, date
I'd like for a user to be able to add notes to the notes field, and not have to
re-index the document (since the body field may contain 100MB of text). Some
ideas:
1) How about creating another core which only contains id, checksum, and notes?
Thank you for the answers. I'm moving forward and have few more
questions but for separate threads.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, typically after your index has been replicated from master to a slave a
> commit will be issued and the new searcher will be
Hi,
I can see only fieldCache (nothing about filter, query or document
cache) on stats page. What I'm doing wrong? We have two servers with
replication. There are two cores(prod, dev) on each server. Maybe I
have to add something to solrconfig.xml of cores?
Best Regards,
Solr Beginner
Title pretty much says it all; I've configured the DIH in 3.1.0, and
it works great, except the delta-imports are always from the last time
a full-import happened, not a delta-import. After a delta-import,
dataimport.properties is completely untouched. The documentation
implies that the delta-impor
Thanks for the links Otis,
I will have a look.
Regards
Ericz
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Before using the terms component, allow me to point out:
>
> * http://sematext.com/products/autocomplete/index.html (used on
> http
53 matches
Mail list logo
