Perhaps this could help :
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Shared-conf-td2787771.html#a2789447
Ludovic.
2011/4/20 kun xiong [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2841801-1701787156-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> Hi all,
>
> Currently in my project , most of the core configurations are
> same(solrconfig.xml, dataim
Ok thank you for the discussion. As I thought regard to not possible within
performance limits.
I think the way to go is to document some more stats at index time, and use
them in boost queries. :)
Thanks
Mike
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:12:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Custom Sorting
> From: ericker
hi, i asked that :)
didnt get that.. what dependencies?
i am using solr 1.4 and tika 0.9
i replaced tika-core 0.9 and tika-parsers 0.9 at /contrib/extraction/lib
also replaced old version of dataimporthandler-extras by
apache-solr-dataimporthandler-extras-3.1.0.jar
but still same problem..
som
Hello,
short question is this - is there a way for a search to return a field that
is not defined in the schema but is a minimal/maximum value of several
(int/float) fields in solrDocument? (and how would that search look like?)
Longer explanation. I have products and each of them can have a seve
Hello,
Have you tried reading :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Sort_By_Function
From that page I would try something like :
http://host:port/solr/select?q=sony&sort=min(min(priceCash,priceCreditCard),priceCoupon)+asc&rows=10&indent=on&debugQuery=on
Is that of any help ?
--
Tanguy
I will be out of the office starting 20/04/2011 and will not return until
21/04/2011.
Please email to itsta...@actionimages.com for any urgent issues.
Action Images is a division of Reuters Limited and your data will therefore be
protected
in accordance with the Reuters Group Privacy / Data P
I just use soft-links...
Ephraim Ofir
-Original Message-
From: lboutros [mailto:boutr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How could each core share configuration files
Perhaps this could help :
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabb
Tanguy, thanks for the anwser.
Yes I have already tried that but the problem is that min() function is not
yet available (it is set for Solr 3.2).
:(
Btw. in my original post I've asked if the query could in the results return
a new field with this computed minimal value - that is redudant, I'm
Seems like it isn't. In my installation (1.4.1) i used
LucidKStemFilterFactory, and when switching the solr.war file to the 3.1 one
i get:
14:42:31.664 ERROR [pool-1-thread-1]: java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.TokenStream.incrementToken()Z
at
org.apache.lucene.analy
Does this persist? In other words, if you just watch it for
some time, does the disk usage go back to normal?
Because it's typical that your index size will temporarily
spike after the operations you describe as new searchers
are warmed up. During that interval, both the old and new
searchers are
Hi Erik,
Am 20.04.2011 13:56, schrieb Erick Erickson:
Does this persist? In other words, if you just watch it for
some time, does the disk usage go back to normal?
Only after restarting the whole solr the disk usage goes back to normal.
Because it's typical that your index size will tempora
H, this isn't right. You've pretty much eliminated the obvious
things. What does lsof show? I'm assuming it shows the files are
being held open by your Solr instance, but it's worth checking.
I'm not getting the same behavior, admittedly on a Windows box.
The only other thing I can think of is
Hello,
I am dealing with a highlighting issue in SOLR, I will try to explain
the issue.
When I search for a single term in solr, it wraps tag around the
words I want to highlight, all works well.
But if I search multiple term, for most part highlighting works good and
then for some of the terms,
Hi Erik,
Am 20.04.2011 15:42, schrieb Erick Erickson:
H, this isn't right. You've pretty much eliminated the obvious
things. What does lsof show? I'm assuming it shows the files are
being held open by your Solr instance, but it's worth checking.
Just commited new content 3 times and finall
I went unsuccessfully down this path - too many incompatibilities among
versions
- some code changes and recompiling required. See also thread "Solr 1.4.1 and
Tika 0.9 - some tests not passing" for remaining issues. You'll have better
luck with the newer Solr 3.1 release, which already uses T
after reading this post i hoped that i could achieve.. but couldnt find any
success in almost a week
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/TikaEntityProcessor-not-working-td856965.html#a867572
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/TikaEntityProcessor-tp2839188p2843084.
Hello,
I watched an online video with Chris Hostsetter from Lucidimagination. He
showed the possibility of having some Facets that exclude *all* filter while
also having some Facets that take care of some of the set filters while
ignoring other filters.
Unfortunately the Webinar did not explain h
It looks OK, but still doesn't explain keeping the old files around. What is
your in your solrconfig.xml look like? It's
possible that you're seeing Solr attempt to keep around several
optimized copies of the index, but that still doesn't explain why
restarting Solr removes them unless the deletio
Does your configuration have "hl.mergeContiguous" set to true by any
chance? And what
happens if you explicitly set this to "false" on your query?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Ramanathapuram, Rajesh
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am dealing with a highlighting issue in SOLR, I will try to
Hi all,
i'm getting the following exception when using highlighting for a field
containing HTMLStripCharFilterFactory:
org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.InvalidTokenOffsetsException: Token
... exceeds length of provided text sized 21
It seems this is a know issue:
https://issues.apache.or
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Craig Stires wrote:
> The barrier I have is that I need to build this offline (without using a
> solr server, solrconfig.xml, or schema.xml)
This is pretty unusual... can you share your use case?
Solr can also be run in embedded mode if you can't run a stand-alon
Hi, there is a proposed patch uploaded to the issue. Maybe you can
help by reviewing/testing it?
2011/4/20 Robert Gründler :
> Hi all,
>
> i'm getting the following exception when using highlighting for a field
> containing HTMLStripCharFilterFactory:
>
> org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.Invalid
Stemming filter analyzers... anyone have any favorites for particular
search domains? Just wondering what people are using. I'm using Lucid
K Stemmer and having issues. Seems like it misses a lot of common
stems. We went to that because of excessively loose matches on the
solr.PorterStemFilter
You can get a better sense of exactly what tranformations occur when
if you look at the analysis page (be sure to check the "verbose"
checkbox).
I'm surprised that "bags" doesn't match "bag", what does the analysis
page say?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Robert Petersen wrote:
> S
I've just started experimenting with the solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory in
Solr 3.1, and I'm seeing some strange behavior. It seems that every word
subsequent to a protected word is also treated as being protected.
For testing purposes, I have put the word "spelling" in my protwords.txt. If I
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Demian Katz wrote:
> I've just started experimenting with the solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory in
> Solr 3.1, and I'm seeing some strange behavior. It seems that every word
> subsequent to a protected word is also treated as being protected.
You're right! This
Thanks Erick.
I tried your suggestion, the issue still exists.
http://localhost:8983/searchsolr/mainCore/select?indent=on&version=2.2&q=mec+us+chile&fq=storyid%3DXXX%22&start=0&rows=10&fl=*&qt=standard&wt=standard&explainOther=&hl=on&hl.fl=story%2C+slug&hl.fragsize=10&hl.highlightMultiTe
No, this is only a bug in analysis.jsp.
you can see this by comparing analysis.jsp's "dontstems bees" to using
the query debug interface:
"dontstems bees"
"dontstems bees"
PhraseQuery(text:"dontstems bee")
text:"dontstems bee"
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On We
That's good news -- thanks for the help (not to mention the reassurance that
Solr itself is actually working right)! Hopefully 3.1.1 won't be too far off,
though; when the analysis tool lies, life can get very confusing! :-)
- Demian
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1797
that issue doesn't seem to have anything to do with the stack trace
reported...
: > SEVERE: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
: > java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
: > org.apache.solr.common.util.ConcurrentLRUCache$Stats.add(Lorg/apache/solr/c
I have been doing that, and for Bags example the trailing 's' is not being
removed by the Kstemmer so if indexing the word bags and searching on bag you
get no matches. Why wouldn't the trailing 's' get stemmed off? Kstemmer is
dictionary based so bags isn't in the dictionary? That trailing
Hi guys,
I have encountered a problem with entity name, see the data config code
below. the variable '${ea.a_aid}' was always empty. I suspect it is a
namespace issue. Anyone knows how to bypass it?
This is on oracle database. I had to use the prefix "myschema.", otherwise,
the table name was no
Hi,
I am looking for the best way to find the terms with the highest frequency
for a given subset of documents. (terms in the text field)
My first thought was to do a count facet search , where the query defines
the subset of documents and the facet.field is the text field, this gives me
the result
I think faceting is probably the best way to do that, indeed. It might be slow,
but it's kind of set up for exactly that case, I can't imagine any other
technique being faster -- there's stuff that has to be done to look up the info
you want.
BUT, I see your problem: don't use facet.method=en
: Subject: How to index MS SQL Server column with image type
:
: Hi all,
:
: When I index a column(image type) of a table via *
: http://localhost:8080/solr/dataimport?command=full-import*
: *There is a error like this: String length must be a multiple of four.*
For future refrence: full error
thanks, but that's what i started with, but it took an even longer time and
threw this:
Approaching too many values for UnInvertedField faceting on field 'text' :
bucket size=15560140
Approaching too many values for UnInvertedField faceting on field 'text :
bucket size=15619075
Exception during fac
seems like the facet search is not all that suited for a full text field. (
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/178f1a82ff19070c/solr_severe_error_when_doing_a_faceted_search#16562790cda76197
)
Maybe i should go another direction. I think that the HighFreqTerms
approach, just not su
: thanks, but that's what i started with, but it took an even longer time and
: threw this:
: Approaching too many values for UnInvertedField faceting on field 'text' :
: bucket size=15560140
: Approaching too many values for UnInvertedField faceting on field 'text :
: bucket size=15619075
: Excep
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : thanks, but that's what i started with, but it took an even longer time and
> : threw this:
> : Approaching too many values for UnInvertedField faceting on field 'text' :
> : bucket size=15560140
> : Approaching too many values for UnIn
Thanks
but i've disabled the cache already, since my concern is speed and i'm
willing to pay the price (memory), and my subset are not fixed.
Does the facet search do any extra work that i don't need, that i might be
able to disable (either by a flag or by a code change),
Somehow i feel, or rather
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Bill Bell wrote:
> I would like to influence the score but I would rather not mess with the q=
> field since I want the query to dismax for Q.
>
> Something like:
>
> fq={!type=dismax qf=$qqf v=$qspec}&
> fq={!type=dismax qt=dismaxname v=$qname}&
> q=_val_:"{!type
BTW,
i'm using solr 1.4.1, does 3.1 or 4.0 contain any performance improvements
that will make a difference as far as facet search?
thanks again
Ofer
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Ofer Fort wrote:
> Thanks
> but i've disabled the cache already, since my concern is speed and i'm
> willing to p
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Ofer Fort wrote:
> Thanks
> but i've disabled the cache already, since my concern is speed and i'm
> willing to pay the price (memory)
Then you should not disable the cache.
>, and my subset are not fixed.
> Does the facet search do any extra work that i don't ne
my documents are user entries, so i'm guessing they vary a lot.
Tomorrow i'll try 3.1 and also 4.0, and see if they have an improvement.
thanks guys!
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Ofer Fort wrote:
> > Thanks
> > but i've disabled the cach
HI, all.
I'm working on upgrading from 1.4.1 to 3.1, and I'm having some troubles with
some of the unit test code for our custom Filters. We wrote the tests to
extend AbstractSolrTestCase, and I've been reading the thread about the
test-harness elements not being present in the 3.1 distributab
Hi Yonik,
The limitations I need to work within, have to do with the index already
being built as part of an existing process.
Currently, the Solr server is in read-only mode and receives new indexes
daily from a Java application. The Java app runs Lucene/Tika and is
indexing resources within t
Hi all,
I am a new to solr,I am importing data from database using DIH(solr
1.4).One document is made up of two entity,Every entity is a table in
database.
For example:
Table1:have 3 fields;
Table2:have 4 fields;
If it is Ok,it will be 7 fields.
But it is only 4 fields,it seem that solr don't merge
Hey (solr-user) Mailing list admin's,
I've tried replying to a thread multiple times tonight, and keep getting a
bounce-back with this response:
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the ot
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:30:29AM -0400, Trey Grainger wrote:
> (FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
Note the "HTML_MESSAGE" in the list of things SpamAssassin didn't like.
> Apparently I s
Hi,
Is there a way to create different solr indexes for different categories?
We have different document workspaces and ideally want each workspace to have
its own solr index.
Thanks,
Gaurav
It depends on your application design how you want your index
There is a feature called solr core . http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
You could still have a single index but a field to differentiate the items
in index
thanks
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Gaurav Shingala <
gaurav.shing
Hi Erik,
1
0
Due to 44 minutes optimization time we do an optimization once a day
during the night.
I will try with an smaler index on my development system.
Best regards,
Bernd
Am 20.04.2011 17:50, schrieb Erick Erickson:
It looks OK, but still doesn't explain keeping the old files aroun
52 matches
Mail list logo
