I managed to find both documents with your two input queries .
Add this filter in your analyzer query part :
=>
The main problem is that your query "microsoft" is transfor
How can they require payment for something that was developed under the
apache license?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Difference-between-Solr-and-Lucidworks-distribution-tp2474792p2771191.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm doing some performance benchmarking of Solr and I started with a single big
JSON file containing all the docs that I'm sending via curl. The results are
fantastic - I'm achieving an indexing rate of about 44,000 docs/sec using this
method (these are really small test docs). In the past I hav
Take "Lucidworks for Solr", it's free.
Regards, Wolfram
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: yehosef [mailto:yeho...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. April 2011 15:57
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Difference between Solr and Lucidworks distribution
How can they require payment
On Apr 3, 2011, at 6:56am, yehosef wrote:
> How can they require payment for something that was developed under the
> apache license?
It's the difference between free speech and free beer :)
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis_versus_libre
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
+1
Hi,
My index contains a root entity "Post" and a child entity "Comments". Each
post can have multiple comments. data-config.xml:
Well, what is "a document on the filesystem"? Solr deals
with well-formed XML documents of a specific format. You
can't just stream a random file to Solr. Specifically
documents look like:
value for field
.
.
.
perhaps with an .
There are ways for structured documents to be added using the
T
Hi Erick,
thanx for getting back to me.
"Well, what is "a document on the filesystem"? Solr deals
with well-formed XML documents of a specific format."
I would like to index all kinds of documents. For a start I'll be happy to
be able to work with xml and html documents.
--
View this message in
Is this a general question or specific? You can handle specific ones by
using synonyms.
But the general case, that is treating any two pairs of tokens as
a single pair seems fraught with unintended consequences, but
you know your problem space better than I do.
Best
Erick
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at
Hmmm, I think you're misunderstanding faceting. It's counting the
number of documents that have a particular value. So if you're
faceting on "comment_post_id", there is one and only one document
with that value (assuming that the comment_post_ids are unique).
Which is what's being reported This
OK, you're still not quite on the right track. You can't just
index XML documents without transforming them into
valid Solr XML documents. Ditto for HTML.
Take a look at the ExtractingRequestHandler documentation at:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
Here's some more documentat
Jeffery:
It's perfectly appropriate to raise a JIRA for something like this.
If you could add the steps to make this happen, that'd be great.
see: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Contributing_your_work.
If you can add a patch, that'd be even better (instructions on that page
too). Y
It's not a specific case only ( e.g. microsoft.com), but it's really a
multi word issue.
carwash, bookkeeper etc...
I'm ultimately looking for a schema for search and retrieve that's heavily
focused on 'names'.. these are peoples names, business names etc.. not
content like large text fields,
Short form:
I think you're going down a rabbit-hole and should just
use synonyms and forget about it.
I'm particularly thinking that a general-purpose solution
that somehow breaks up or combines adjacent tokens
will have consequences that pop out other places that
you don't want and you'll have to
Ok. My expectation was since "comment_post_id" is a MultiValued field hence
it would appear multiple times (i.e. for each comment). And hence when I
would facet with that field it would also give me the count of those many
documents where comment_post_id appears.
My requirement is getting total fo
Wouldn't you want to extract your original data format from the index and then
'count' the comments for each post ?
I don't think facets are appropriate.
On Apr 3, 2011, at 22:10, Kaushik Chakraborty wrote:
> Ok. My expectation was since "comment_post_id" is a MultiValued field hence
> it wou
Why not count them on the way in and just store that number along
with the original e-mail?
Best
Erick
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Kaushik Chakraborty wrote:
> Ok. My expectation was since "comment_post_id" is a MultiValued field hence
> it would appear multiple times (i.e. for each comment
17 matches
Mail list logo
