Hi Chris,
I have opened an issue (SOLR-2146 [1]) following that discussion.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2146
cheers
--
Renaud Delbru
On 14/09/10 01:06, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Yes, I have thought of that, or even extending field type. But this does not
: work for my use c
Hello all,
I am trying to follow the documentation given here
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThisHandler to enable MoreLikeThis
in my application. However, when I execute any URL such as the one below
/solr/mlt?stream.body=social media in india&mlt.fl=content&mlt.mintf=0
I get a 404 err
--- On Sat, 10/9/10, Titash Neogi wrote:
> From: Titash Neogi
> Subject: How to enable solr MoreLikeThis
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Date: Saturday, October 9, 2010, 3:28 PM
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to follow the documentation given here
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeT
Related. Can't be larger than -Xmx. :) Or even equal to -Xmx, because other
things need to live in the heap. There is no exact function, so be more on the
conservative side in order to avoid OOME.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: h
That might work, although depending on your use-case it might be hard to
have a good controlled vocab on citynames (hotel metropole bruxelles, hotel
metropole brussels, hotel metropole brussel, etc.) Also 'hotel paris
bruxelles' stinks...
given your example:
> Doc 1
> name => "Holiday Inn"
> ci
Hi,
Please find the configurations below.
Machine configurations(Solr running here):
RAM - 4 GB
HardDisk - 180GB
Os - Red Hat linux version 5
Processor-2x Intel Core 2 Duo CPU @2.66GHz
Machine configurations(Mysql server is running here):
RAM - 4 GB
HardDisk - 180GB
Os - Red Hat linux version
I have a requirement to highlight search results, and to display
documents with matching terms highlighted in the context of the original
XML document structure.
It seems like this must be a very common use case, but I am having
trouble finding a way to accomplish what we need to do using sol
OK - I read a bit more and it appears an appropriate analysis pipeline
(which would extract text from XML using SAX, say) is all that's
required, and existing highlighting ought to be able to accomplish what
I'm after. So I guess the only question I have now before writing code
is where is th
Looking at it, and now knowing how much memory your other processes on your box
use (nor how much memory you have set aside for Java), I would start with
DOUBLING your ram. Make sure that you have enough Java memory.
You will know if it has some effect by using the 2:1 size ratio. 100mb for all
Hi,
there are two relative similar solutions for this problem.
I will describe one of them:
* create a multivalued string field called 'category'
* you have a category tree. so make sure a document gets not only the
leaf category, but all categories (name or id) until the root
* now facet over
I want to enable users to select multiple facet values for a specific facet
fields. For example, if "color" is a facet field, I'd like to let users to
select "red" OR "blue".
Please note, I've set
because I want "q=hello+world" means "hello" and "world" are AND'ed together.
1) What is the synt
> OK - I read a bit more and it
> appears an appropriate analysis pipeline (which would
> extract text from XML using SAX, say) is all that's
> required, and existing highlighting ought to be able to
> accomplish what I'm after. So I guess the only
> question I have now before writing code is whe
> I want to enable users to select
> multiple facet values for a specific facet fields. For
> example, if "color" is a facet field, I'd like to let users
> to select "red" OR "blue".
>
> Please note, I've set
>
> because I want "q=hello+world" means "hello" and "world"
> are AND'ed together.
>
>
Yes - that looks right; I was thrown a bit by the name -
Thanks!
On 10/9/2010 5:23 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
OK - I read a bit more and it
appears an appropriate analysis pipeline (which would
extract text from XML using SAX, say) is all that's
required, and existing highlighting ought to be a
I'm confused. What do you mean that a user can "set any
number of arbitrarily named fields on a document". It sounds
like you are talking about a user adding arbitrarily may entries
to a multi-valued field? Or is it some kind of key:value pairs
in a field in your schema?
Under any circumstances, s
15 matches
Mail list logo