Hello,
Is it possible to do a text search within facets? Something that will
return me what words solr used to gather my results and how many of those
results were found.
For example, if I have the following field:
and it has docs that contain something like
english bulldog
french bulldog
b
Hi,
Thanks ! This is very useful :) :)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Joe Calderon wrote:
> if you use the core model via solr.xml you can reload a core without having
> to to restart the servlet container,
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
>
> On 02/11/2010 02:40 PM, Emad Mushtaq wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to solr/solrj.
I correctly started up the server example given in the distribution
(apache-solr-1.4.0\example\solr), populated the index with test data set, and
successfully tested with http query string via browser (es.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?indent=on&q=video&fl=
Hi
I am indexing the name "FC St. Gallen" using the following type:
Which according to analysis.jsp gets split into:
f | fc | s | st | g | ga | gal | gall | gal
> Which according to analysis.jsp gets split into:
> f | fc | s | st | g | ga | gal | gall | galle | gallen
>
> So far so good.
>
> Now if I search for "fc st.gallen" according to
> analysis.jsp it will search for:
> fc | st | gallen
>
> But when I do a dismax search using the following handler:
I suspect this has something to do with the dataDir setting in the example 's
solrconfig.xml
${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}
we use the example's solrconfig.xml as the base for our deployments and always
comment this out
the default of having conf and data sitting under the solr home works wel
Hello,
I have a question related to local solr. For certain locations (latitude,
longitude), the spatial search does not work. Here is the query I try to
make which gives me no results:
q=*&qt=geo&sort=geo_distance asc&lat=33.718151&long=73.
060547&radius=450
However if I make the same query wit
On 12.02.2010, at 11:17, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> analysis.jsp does not do actual query parsing. just shows produced tokens
> step by step in analysis (charfilter, tokenizer, tokenfilter) phase.
> "admin/analysis.jsp page will show you how your field is processed while
> indexing and while querying
hi
in my solr u have 1,42,45,223 records having some 50GB .
Now when iam loading a new record and when its trying optimize the docs its
taking 2 much memory and time
can any body please tell do we have any property in solr to get rid of this.
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in contex
Yes you are right.
[code.2] works fine by commenting out the following lines on solrconfig.xml
Is it correct this different behaviour from EmbeddedSolrServer ?
Or it can be considered a low priority bug?
Thanks for you prompt reply!
Dino.
--
Da: Ron Chan
When using EmbeddedSolrServer, you could simply set the solr.data.dir
system property or launch your process from the same working directory
where you are launching the HTTP version of Solr. Either of those
should also work to alleviate this issue.
Erik
On Feb 12, 2010, at 5:36 AM
don't think this is a bug, the default behaviour is for /data to sit under Solr
home
there should be no need to use this parameter unless it is special case
not sure why it is like this in the example
- Original Message -
From: dcdmailbox-i...@yahoo.it
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
Does anyone know good literature(web resources, books etc) on basics of
search? I do have Solr 1.4 and Lucene books but wanted to go in more details
on basics.
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Good-literature-on-search-basics-tp27562021p27562021.html
Sent from the
Does Solr use some sort of a persistent cache?
I do this 10 times in a loop:
* start solr
* create a core
* execute warmup query
* execute query with sort fields
* stop solr
Executing the query with sort fields takes 5-20 times longer the first
iteration than the other 9 iterations. For
2010/2/12 Tim Terlegård
> Does Solr use some sort of a persistent cache?
>
> I do this 10 times in a loop:
> * start solr
> * create a core
> * execute warmup query
> * execute query with sort fields
> * stop solr
>
> Executing the query with sort fields takes 5-20 times longer the first
> i
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to boost an exact phrase match such as q="video poker" over
> q=video poker. How would I do this using dismax?
>
> I tried pre-processing video poker into, video poker "video poker"
> however that ju
I try to config spellcheck, but I still have this problem:
Config:
solr.FileBasedSpellChecker
file
spellings.txt
UTF-8
./spellcheckerFile
false
false
1
true
file
spellcheck
Maybe I have thi
Hi Emad,
I had the same issue (
http://old.nabble.com/Spatial---Local-Solr-radius-td26943608.html ), it
seems that this happens only on eastern areas of the world. Try inverting
the sign of all your longitudes, or translate all your longitudes to the
west.
Cheers,
Mauricio
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 a
> Anyways so how can I get "st.gallen" split into two terms
> at query time?
As you mentioned in your first mail, query st.gallen is already broken into two
terms/words. But query parser constructs a phrase query.
There was an disscussion about this behaviour earlier.
http://www.lucidimagination
in the schema.xml I have fileds with int type and default value
exp:
but when a document has no value for the field "postal_code"
at indexing, I get the following error:
Posting file Immo.xml to http://localhost:8983/solr/update/
Error 500
HTTP ERROR: 500For input string: ""
java.lang.Numb
2010/2/12 Shalin Shekhar Mangar :
> 2010/2/12 Tim Terlegård
>
>> Does Solr use some sort of a persistent cache?
>>
> Solr does not have a persistent cache. That is the operating system's file
> cache at work.
Aha, that's very interesting and seems to make sense.
So is the primary goal of warmup
See http://markmail.org/thread/z5sq2jr2a6eayth4
On 12 February 2010 12:14, javaxmlsoapdev wrote:
>
> Does anyone know good literature(web resources, books etc) on basics of
> search? I do have Solr 1.4 and Lucene books but wanted to go in more
> details
> on basics.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> View this
When a document has no value, are you still sending a postal_code
field in your post to Solr? Seems like you are.
Erik
On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:12 AM, nabil rabhi wrote:
in the schema.xml I have fileds with int type and default value
exp: stored="true"
default="0"/>
but when a docume
Was going to post that I more or less figured it out. Dismax handles
this automatically with the ps parameter, which is different than the
bs parameter...
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
> jason.rutherg...@gmail.
yes, sometimes the document has postal_code with no values , i still post it
to solr
2010/2/12 Erik Hatcher
> When a document has no value, are you still sending a postal_code field in
> your post to Solr? Seems like you are.
>
>Erik
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:12 AM, nabil rabhi wrote:
Really? The last time I looked at AIE, I am pretty sure there was Solr core
msgs in the logs, so I assumed it used EmbeddedSolr or something. But I may be
mistaken. Anyone from Attivio here who can elaborate? Is the join stuff at
Lucene level or on top of multiple Solr cores or what?
--
Jan Høy
That would be the problem then, I believe. Simply don't post a value
to get the default value to work.
Erik
On Feb 12, 2010, at 10:18 AM, nabil rabhi wrote:
yes, sometimes the document has postal_code with no values , i still
post it
to solr
2010/2/12 Erik Hatcher
When a documen
thanx Eric, that was very helpfull
2010/2/12 Erik Hatcher
> That would be the problem then, I believe. Simply don't post a value to
> get the default value to work.
>
>Erik
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 10:18 AM, nabil rabhi wrote:
>
> yes, sometimes the document has postal_code with no va
One solution is to add the persistent cache with memcache at the
application layer.
--
Tommy Chheng
Programmer and UC Irvine Graduate Student
Twitter @tommychheng
http://tommy.chheng.com
On 2/12/10 5:19 AM, Tim Terlegård wrote:
2010/2/12 Shalin Shekhar Mangar:
2010/2/12 Tim Terlegård
Do
> For example, if I have the following field:
>
> stored="true"/>
>
> and it has docs that contain something like
>
> english bulldog
> french bulldog
> bichon frise
>
> If I search for "english bulldog" and facet on "dog", I
> will get the
> following:
>
> 135
> 23
> 12
Thats strange. The q
HiIs there a way for solr or lucene to expire documents based on a field in a
document. Let's say that I have a createTime field whose type is date, can i
set a policy in schema.xml for solr to delete the documents older than X
days?Thank you
Hello Mauricio,
Do you know why such a problem occurs. Has it to do with certain latitudes,
longitudes. If so why is it happening. Is it a bug in local solr?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Mauricio Scheffer <
mauricioschef...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Emad,
>
> I had the same issue (
> http://old
You could easily have a scheduled job that ran delete by query to
remove posts older than a certain date...
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 13:00, Matthieu Labour
wrote:
> HiIs there a way for solr or lucene to expire documents based on a field in a
> document. Let's say that I have a createTime field w
HI Guys
Opening this thread again.
I need to get around this issue.
i have a spellcheck field defined and i am copying two fileds make and model
to this field
i have buildoncommit and buildonoptimize set to true hence when i index data
and try to search for a work accod i get back suggestion ac
Yes, it seems to be a bug, at least with the code you and I are using. If
you don't need to search across the whole globe, try translating your
longitudes as I suggested.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Emad Mushtaq
wrote:
> Hello Mauricio,
>
> Do you know why such a problem occurs. Has it to do
Hi Tim,
We generally run about 1600 cache-warming queries to warm up the OS disk
cache and the Solr caches when we mount a new index.
Do you have/expect phrase queries? If you don't, then you don't need to
get any position information into your OS disk cache. Our position
information takes ab
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has prepared a synonyms.txt for general purpose
search engines, that can be shared. If not could you refer me to places
where such a synonym list or thesaurus can be found. Synonyms for search
engines are different from the regular thesaurus. Any help would be highly
Hi,
at openthesaurus.org or .com you can find a mysql version of synonyms you just
have to join it to fit the synonym schema of solr yourself.
Am 12.02.2010 um 20:03 schrieb Emad Mushtaq:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has prepared a synonyms.txt for general purpose
> search engines, th
Hi all,
I am the author of the article referenced in this thread and after reading
it again, I can understand where there might have been confusion and my
apologies on that. I have edited the article to indicate that a
deduplication component is in the works and referenced SOLR-236. The article
ca
Wow thanks!! You all are awesome! :D :D
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Julian Hille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at openthesaurus.org or .com you can find a mysql version of synonyms you
> just have to join it to fit the synonym schema of solr yourself.
>
>
> Am 12.02.2010 um 20:03 schrieb Emad Mushtaq:
Hi,
Your welcome. Thats something google came up with some weeks ago :)
Am 12.02.2010 um 20:42 schrieb Emad Mushtaq:
> Wow thanks!! You all are awesome! :D :D
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Julian Hille wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> at openthesaurus.org or .com you can find a mysql version o
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> Otherwise, I'd do it via copy fields. Your first field is your main field
> and is analyzed as before. Your second field does the profanity detection
> and simply outputs a single token at the end, safe/unsafe.
>
> How long are your
If I've done a lot of research and have a very good idea of where my cache
sizes are having monitored the stats right before commits, is there any
reason why I wouldn't just set the initialSize and size counts to the same
values? Is there any reason to set a smaller initialSize if I know reliably
t
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
> If I've done a lot of research and have a very good idea of where my cache
> sizes are having monitored the stats right before commits, is there any
> reason why I wouldn't just set the initialSize and size counts to the same
> values? Is there an
when using solr.xml, you can specify a sharedlib directory to share
among cores, is it possible to reload the classes in this dir without
having to restart the servlet container? it would be useful to be able
to make changes to those classes on the fly or be able to drop in new
plugins
I always use initial size = max size,
just to avoid Arrays.copyOf()...
Initial (default) capacity for HashMap is 16, when it is not enough - array
copy to new 32-element array, then to 64, ...
- too much wasted space! (same for ConcurrentHashMap)
Excuse me if I didn't understand the question...
Funny, Arrays.copy() for HashMap... but something similar...
Anyway, I use same values for initial size and max size, to be safe... and
to have OOP at startup :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Fuad Efendi [mailto:f...@efendi.ca]
> Sent: February-12-10 6:55 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apach
Any update on this
Do you guys want to rephrase my question, if its not clear.
Thanks
darniz
darniz wrote:
>
> HI Guys
> Opening this thread again.
> I need to get around this issue.
> i have a spellcheck field defined and i am copying two fileds make and
> model to this field
>
>
> i have
: Otherwise, I'd do it via copy fields. Your first field is your main
: field and is analyzed as before. Your second field does the profanity
: detection and simply outputs a single token at the end, safe/unsafe.
you don't even need custom code for this ... copyFiled all your text into
a 'ha
: You could easily have a scheduled job that ran delete by query to
: remove posts older than a certain date...
or since you specificly asked about delteing anything older
then X days (in this example i'm assuming x=7)...
createTime:[NOW-7DAYS TO *]
-Hoss
Hi there,
I'm trying to migrate from solr 1.3 to solr 1.4 and I've few
issues. Initially my localsolr was throwing NullPointer exception and I
fixed it by changing type of lat and lng to 'tdouble'. But now I'm not
able to update index. When I try to update index it throws out error
say
I am seeing this in several of my fields. I have something like "Samsung
X150" or "Nokia BH-212". And my query will not match on X150 or BH-212.
So, my query is something like +model:(Samsung X150). Through debugQuery, I see
that this gets converted to +(model:samsung model:"x 150"). It
matches
: I have noticed that when I run concurrent full-imports using DIH in Solr
: 1.4, the index ends up getting corrupted. I see the following in the log
I'm fairly confident that concurrent imports won't work -- but it
shouldn't corrupt your index -- even if the DIH didn't actively check for
this
: > Can your query consist of more than one words?
:
: Yes, and I expect it almost always will (the query string is coming
: from a search box on a website).
...
: Actually it won't. The data I am indexing has extra spaces in front
: and is capitalized. I really need to be able to filter
Hey everyone, I don't actually have a question, but I just thought I'd
share something really cool that I did with Solr for our company.
We run a good amount of servers, well into the several hundreds, and
naturally we need a way to centralize all of the system logs. For a
while we used a com
:title^1.2 contentEN^0.8 contentIT^0.8 contentDE^0.8
:title^1.2 contentEN^0.8 contentIT^0.8 contentDE^0.8
FWIW: I don't think you understand what the "bf" param is for ... it's not
analogous to qf and pf, it's for expressing a list of boost functions -- a
function can be a simple field
: that *may* be causing your problem, if the function parser is attempting
: to generate the FieldCache for your content fields.
Yep ... that's it ... if you use a barefield name as a function, and that
field name is not numeric, the result is an OrdFieldSource shiceh uses the
FieldCache.
I o
> or since you specificly asked about delteing anything older
> then X days (in this example i'm assuming x=7)...
>
> createTime:[NOW-7DAYS TO *]
createTime:[* TO NOW-7DAYS]
: if you use the core model via solr.xml you can reload a core without having to
: to restart the servlet container,
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
For making a schema change, the steps would be:
- create a "new_core" with the new schema
- reindex all the docs into "new_core"
- "SW
: Any update on this
Patience my friend ... 5 hours after you send an email isn't long enough
to wait before asking for "any update on this" -- it's just increasing the
volume of mail everyone gets and distracting people from actual
bugs/issues.
FWIW: this doesn't really seem directly related
It appears that
omitTermFreqAndPositions is indeed the culprit. I assume it has to do with the
fact that the index parsing of BH-212 puts multiple terms in the same position.
From: Kevin Osborn
To: Solr
Sent: Fri, February 12, 2010 5:28:08 PM
Subject: cannot
concurrent imports are not allowed in DIH, unless u setup multiple DIH instances
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I have noticed that when I run concurrent full-imports using DIH in Solr
> : 1.4, the index ends up getting corrupted. I see the following in the log
>
>
: concurrent imports are not allowed in DIH, unless u setup multiple DIH
instances
Right, but that's not the issue -- the question is wether attemping
to do so might be causing index corruption (either because of a bug or
because of some possibly really odd config we currently know nothing abo
Right now if I have the query model:(Nokia BH-212V), the parser turns this into
+(model:nokia model:"bh 212 v"). The problem is that I might have a model
called Nokia BH-212, so this is completely missed. In my case, I would like my
query to be +(model:nokia model:bh model:212 model:v).
This is
Am 13.02.2010 um 03:02 schrieb Antonio Lobato:
> Just thought this would be a neat story to share with you all. I've really
> grown to love Solr, it's something else!
Hi Antonio,
Great.
Would you also share the source code somewhere!
May the Source be with you.
Thanks.
Olivier
65 matches
Mail list logo
