Thanks Sascha for your post, but i find it interresting, but in my case i
don't want to use an additionnal field, i want to be able with the same
schema to do a simple query like : "q=res_url:some url", and a query like
the other one;
in other word; is there any solution to make two or more multiv
Thanks all for your interest, especially Uwe. I asked this question on
solr-user at the beginning but I got no reply. That's why I re-asked the
question at java-user.
Thanks for your efforts. I will try it now.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I opened https://issues.apac
ant example is how the solr.war gets generated for the example. It's not
checked in.
On Dec 29, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> The distributed binaries do not include the new spatial types, so the
> .../trunk/example/ store app does not start.
>
> Please either always check in the
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> The distributed binaries do not include the new spatial types, so the
> .../trunk/example/ store app does not start.
?
What distributed binaries are you referring to? The nightly builds?
Are they missing a jar?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimag
On Dec 29, 2009, at 2:19 PM, A. Steven Anderson wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Is there any significant negative performance impact of using a
> dynamicField?
There can be an impact if you are searching against a lot of fields or if you
are indexing a lot of fields on every document, but for the most
> There can be an impact if you are searching against a lot of fields or if
> you are indexing a lot of fields on every document, but for the most part in
> most applications it is negligible.
>
We index a lot of fields at one time, but we can tolerate the performance
impact at index time.
It pro
Hi All,
I'm testing StreamingUpdateSolrServer for indexing but I don't see the
last : finished:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.StreamingUpdateSolrServer$Runner@
in my logs. Do I have to use a special function to wait until update is
effective ?
Another question (maybe easy for you) I'm r
Is there another way to make this happen without making further changes to the
index? Maybe a bounce of the servlet server?
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:23 PM, markwaddle wrote:
I have an index that used to have ~38M docs at 17.2GB. I deleted all but 13K
docs using a delete by query, commit and t
Hi all,
Is there a standard way to automatically update the values returned by
the methods in SolrInfoMBean? Particularly those concerning revision
control etc. I'm assuming folks don't just update that by hand every
commit...
Thanks!
Mat
I am in a need of a handler which consumes web serivce and builds index from
return results of the service. Until now I was building index by reading
data directly from database query using DataImportHandler.
There are new functional requirements to index calculated fields in the
index and allow
Ya, structured data gets a little funny.
For starters, the order of multi-valued fields should be maintained,
so if you have:
http://aaa
5
http://bbb
4
the response will return result in order, so you can map them with
array indicies.
I have played some tricks with a JSON field ana
Hi, so this is only available in 1.5?
I tried in 1.4 and got :
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
'solr.CollationKeyFilterFactory'
Is there a way to do this in 1.4?
The link Shalin sent is a 1.5 link I think.
thanks
Joel
On Dec 25, 2009, at 10:52 PM, Robert Muir wro
All documents matched for Wildcard and Prefix queries get the same score as
they are scored as a ConstantScoreQuery. Example query - title:abc*
In such cases, what determines the ordering of the results? Is it simply the
same order in which those document terms appeared when enumerating through
th
how can i make the score be solely the output of a function query?
the function query wiki page details something like
q=boxname:findbox+_val_:"product(product(x,y),z)"&fl=*,score
but that doesnt seems to work
--joe
Hi all,
I've been working on a small Solr plugin to expose the basic
functionality of lucene-spatial as unobtrusively as possible. I've got
a basic implementation up and passing tests, and I was hoping to get
some feedback on it. Though I've coded against Lucene for a production
app in the past, t
Hi,
Thanks Sascha for your post, but i find it interresting, but in my case i
don't want to use an additionnal field, i want to be able with the same
schema to do a simple query like : "q=res_url:some url", and a query like
the other one;
You could easily write your own query parser (QParserPlug
Hi Mat,
This is an area of active work in Solr right now (see SOLR-773 in JIRA for the
top level tracking issue). Obviously you can do as you wish, but it would be
really great if you chipped in on making the capabilities in Solr better (we've
already added in the Lucene spatial jar, a bunch o
On Dec 30, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Joe Calderon wrote:
> how can i make the score be solely the output of a function query?
>
> the function query wiki page details something like
> q=boxname:findbox+_val_:"product(product(x,y),z)"&fl=*,score
>
>
Wrap the non-function query part in parenthesis and
On Dec 30, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Prasanna R wrote:
> All documents matched for Wildcard and Prefix queries get the same score as
> they are scored as a ConstantScoreQuery. Example query - title:abc*
>
> In such cases, what determines the ordering of the results? Is it simply the
> same order in whic
Hi Mat,
Taking a quick look at your code via the gitHub browser (and not having
downloaded or run it, that's for later! :) ), it looks _very_ clean, and
well commented. Bravo!
If you get a chance and are interested in participating in the SOLR spatial
effort, there are a few issues you could take
Rats! I did not rebuild after updating, so the new schema.xml tripped
over my old example solr.war. Never mind.
On 12/30/09, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
>> The distributed binaries do not include the new spatial types, so the
>> .../trunk/example/
I want to store a SolrInputDocument to the filesystem until it can be sent
to the solr server via the solrj client.
I will be using a quartz job to periodically query a table that contains a
listing of SolrInputDocuments stored as java.io.File that need to be
processed.
Thanks for your time.
Hi Grant,
Thanks for the info and your point is well taken. I should have been
clearer that I have no intention of this project being a long-term
solution for spatial search in Solr - rather I was looking to build a
rough and ready solution that gives some basic spatial search
capabilities to tide
I'm using solrJ to construct a query and it works just fine until I add the
following.
query.setFilterQueries("price:[*+TO+500]", "price:[500+TO+*]");
That generates this error
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad Request
Bad Request
request:
http://balboa:8085/apache-solr
I have done follow it, but if I query with diacritic it respose only
non-diacritic. But I want to query without diacritic anh then solr will be
response both of diacritic and without diacritic :(
Steven A Rowe wrote:
>
> Hi Olala,
>
> You can get something similar to what you want by copying
Use query.addFacetQuery(str) instead.
Erik
On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:16 PM, Jay Fisher wrote:
I'm using solrJ to construct a query and it works just fine until I
add the
following.
query.setFilterQueries("price:[*+TO+500]", "price:[500+TO+*]");
That generates this error
Caused by:
Can anyone help me??? plz!
Olala wrote:
>
> uhm,I am sorry, this is the debug :)
>
>
> "book"
> "book"
> +DisjunctionMaxQuery((name:book)~0.01) ()
> +(name:book)~0.01 ()
> −
>
> −
>
>
> 7.903358 = (MATCH) sum of:
> 7.903358 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(name:book in 19533), product of:
> 1.0
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Prasanna R wrote:
>
> > All documents matched for Wildcard and Prefix queries get the same score
> as
> > they are scored as a ConstantScoreQuery. Example query - title:abc*
> >
> > In such cases, what determ
Thanks! That did it.
~ Jay
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Use query.addFacetQuery(str) instead.
>
>Erik
>
>
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:16 PM, Jay Fisher wrote:
>
> I'm using solrJ to construct a query and it works just fine until I add
>> the
>> following.
>>
>>
>>
Hi,all.
I found a problem on distributed-seach.
when i use "?q=keyword&start=0&rows=20" to query across
distributed-seach,it will return numFound="181" ,then I
change the start param from 0 to 100，it will return numFound="131".
why return different numFound with same query ?
--
V
30 matches
Mail list logo
