Am I right in thinking that a document that the sortable field is only
two sentences long and contains the search term once will score higher
than one that is 50 sentences long that contains the search term 4
times? Is there a way to change it to score higher based only on
number of hits?
--
ht
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that a document that the sortable field is only
> two sentences long and contains the search term once will score higher
> than one that is 50 sentences long that contains the search term 4
> times?
Yep. Assuming 15 to
If I change the schema this way, do I need to re-submit all the
documents to Solr? And if I have them all sitting on disk as XML
files that look like
...
...
is there a quick way to submit them all to Solr?
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:48 A
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> If I change the schema this way, do I need to re-submit all the
> documents to Solr?
Yep. And you should delete the index first before doing so (some
field properties are contagious... merging a segment w/o norms and a
segment with norms wi
I was looking at the script in example/exampledocs to feed documents
to the server.
Just to see if it was possible, I took one of the documents that I've
previously indexed using SolrJ, and I tried to feed it directly to the
Solr server using the following command:
curl http://localhost:8697/solr
Hmmm... perhaps you're missing the tag around the ?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> I was looking at the script in example/exampledocs to feed documents
> to the server.
>
> Just to see if it was possible, I took one of the docume
The add tag isn't part of the document. Is there a way to feed the
actual documents without adding tags that aren't part of the schema to
them?
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> Hmmm... perhaps you're missing the tag around the ?
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.co
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> The add tag isn't part of the document.
Yeah, I know... but that's the way the current XML loader expects it.
The history is that these were XML commands being posted, rather than
XML docs (so one could specify other commands like commit, an
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> I personally think it would be cleaner to allow a post of just a
> (or multiple with a surrounding tag), esp now that we can put
> modifiers in the URL.
Exactly. The action should be in the url.
>
> For now, just use shell scripting I gue
markus.rietz...@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
curl reads from local file or stdin, so you could do something like
if it only a single file from a webserver
curl http://someserver/file.html/ | curl
"http://localhost:8983/solr/update/extract?extractOnly=true"; -F na...@-
but this way no crawling, no
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Insight 49, LLC wrote:
> Is local file URIs a limitation of solr cell, or just curl;
All of Solr's interfaces are currently based on HTTP and usable over a network.
Curl (like wget) is simply a useful command line tool that can speak
HTTP and is nice for testing.
In an earlier message, Yonik suggested that I use omitNorms="true" if
I wanted the length of the document to not be counted in the scoring.
The documentation also mentions that it omits "index-time boosting".
What does that mean?
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
http://careers.stackoverf
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> In an earlier message, Yonik suggested that I use omitNorms="true" if
> I wanted the length of the document to not be counted in the scoring.
> The documentation also mentions that it omits "index-time boosting".
> What does that mean?
You ca
Hi
How do I restrict hits to documents containing all words (regardless
of order) of a query in particular field?
Suppose I have two documents with a field called name in my index:
doc1 => name: Pink
doc2 => name: Pink Floyd
When querying for "Pink" I want only doc1 and when querying for "P
If you wish to save yourself from the hassle of applying the patch, you
can also download it from http://www.jteam.nl/news/solrexplorer
Uri
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
There is also a GWT contribution in JIRA that is pretty handy and will
likely be added in 1.5. See
http://issues.apache.org/jira/
> Hi
>
> How do I restrict hits to documents containing all words
> (regardless of order) of a query in particular field?
>
> Suppose I have two documents with a field called name in my
> index:
>
> doc1 => name: Pink
> doc2 => name: Pink Floyd
>
> When querying for "Pink" I want only doc1 and
Hi Yonik,
I have a question regarding json.wrf parameter that you introduced in Solr
query.
I am using YUi Datasource widget and it accepts JSONP format.
Could you tell me if I specify json.wrf in the query will solr return the
response enclosed in () which is essentially JSONP format.
As of
>
> what am I missing?
>
Change your to
The "splitBy" directive is understood by this transformer
and in your case the attribute was simply ignored.
Don't forget to re-index once you have changed.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Joel Nylund wrote:
> Thanks Chantal, I will keep
>
>
> "q=*:*&fq=ac:*all*&wt=json&rows=15&start=0&indent=on&omitHeader=true&json.wrf=?";
>
Why is the json.wrf not specified? Without the callback function, the string
that is return back is illegal javascript for the browser. You need to
specify this parameter which is a wrapper or a callback funct
>
> When I request with title:econ* I can have the correct answers, but if I
> request with title:écon* I have no answers.
> If I request with title:économ (the exact word of the index) it works, so
> there might be something wrong with the wildcard.
> As far as I can understand the analyser
>
> The use case on DocumentObjectBinder is that I could override
> toSolrInputDocument, and if field = ID, I could do: setField("id",
> obj.getClass().getName() + obj.getId()) or something like that.
>
Unless I am missing something here, can't you write the getter of id field
in your solr bean as
>
> G'day Avlesh, converting the "all" field to type "edgytext" doesn't work as
> expected as the various "text" analysers etc don't get to work on that
> field, so I get less results than expected. And adding the edgy filter into
> the text field also yields less results. I can work around the iss
22 matches
Mail list logo
