Hi there,
is there any way to perform a multi-core query using solrj?
P.S.:
I know about this syntax:
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/select?shards=localhost:8983/solr/core0,localhost:8983/solr/core1&q=
but i'm looking for a more fancy way to do this using solrj (something like
shards(query) )
Hi Kaji, many thanks for your suggestion.
Sorry for delay in my feedback.
I've tried to set hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true, but it still not working.
Here my setup:
100
true
true
100
0.5
[-\w ,/\n\"']
Finally getting back to this...
On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:28 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
2009/9/17 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
:
it is possible to have a sub entity which has XPathEntityProcessor
which can use the link ar the url
This may not be a good solution.
But you can use the
Hello,
I have a problem :)
I search to make a request in solr similaire are "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM
InscriptionNew WHERE choices & 17 > 0;" into mysql.
it is possible, you have an idea ?
Thanks
--
~sahid
http://feeds1.nytimes.com/nyt/rss/Sports
"
processor="XPathEntityProcessor"
forEach="/rss/channel | /rss/channel/item"
dataSource="rss"
transformer="RegexTransformer,DateFormatTransformer">
Hi,
Is there a way to specify an increment gap between tokens with the
PatternTokenizerFactory or do I need to customise it? For instance if I
split on commas in "*Books, Online Shopping, Book Store*" I want to be able
to put a 100 position gap between say "books" and "online shopping".
There is
Antonio,
Put the parameter into element, rather than
.
If you are using "standard" reques thandler, set it like this:
explicit
on
3
features
true
Or you can set it directly in your HTTP request:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=something&hl=on&
AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
I do not know how to solve your problem without writing custom code.
Aaargh. So now i stand between sticking my head into the source OR
writing my own engine (which is not a big deal becouse my requirements
arent that big but it will anyway set me back a week or so).
Ho
> Aaargh. So now i stand between sticking my head into the
> source OR writing my own engine (which is not a big deal
> becouse my requirements arent that big but it will anyway
> set me back a week or so).
There is another way, although it is not a good thing to chance source code of
solr and re
Thanks Hoss,
after your hints that had partially confirmed my considerations, I had
made some tests with the FieldQParser. At the beginning, I had have some
problems, but finally, I was able to solve the problem of multi-word
synonyms at query time in a way that is suitable for us - and possibly
f
Any chance you are indexing to a Master, then synching to a Slave and you
aren't seeing those last 20 on the Slave?
There is an issue with synching between Master and Slave that we've
experienced. If the last commit is very small (20 sounds possible!) it can
occur in the same clock second on th
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Jay Ess wrote:
> The boost (index time) does not work when i am searching for a word with a
> wildcard appended to the end.
> I stumbled on to this "feature" and its pretty much a show stopper for me.
> I am implementing a live search feature where i always have a
I am not using master slave setup. To give more information, I use
EmbeddedSolrServer.
- Sharmila
Feak, Todd wrote:
>
> Any chance you are indexing to a Master, then synching to a Slave and you
> aren't seeing those last 20 on the Slave?
>
> There is an issue with synching between Master a
i have a pretty basic question, is there an existing analyzer that
limits the number of words/tokens indexed from a field? let say i only
wanted to index the top 25 words...
thx much
--joe
Hello,
I have recently installed Solr as an alternative to our home made lucene
search servers, and while in most respects the performance is better, i
notice that phrase searches are incredibly slow compared to normal lucene,
primarily when using facets
example:
"City of New York, Matter of" tak
You might try a couple tests in the Solr admin interface to make sure the
query is being processed the same in both Solr and raw lucene.
1) use the analysis panel to determine if the Solr filter chain is doing
something unexpected compared to your lucene filter chain
2) try running a debug query
Solr just uses a stock lucene phrase query.
What version of Lucene and Solr are you comparing?
Do the queries match the same number of documents?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:18 PM, DHast wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have recently installed Solr as an alternative to
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Joe Calderon wrote:
> i have a pretty basic question, is there an existing analyzer that
> limits the number of words/tokens indexed from a field? let say i only
> wanted to index the top 25 words...
It would be really easy to write one, but no there is not curren
We have &facet.sort=true however our hierarchical fields are being
sorted alphabetically instead of by count.
Here is the field type and field definitions:
omitNorms="true" positionIncrementGap="0" indexed="true"
stored="false" delimiter="/"/>
multiValued="true"/>
Any help is much appreciat
ah, it turns out it was one of my 6 facets, the author. in the data pool
tehre are over 1.9 million documents, and about 800,000 authors, removing
that facet worked since the field was untokenizd and slow considering how
many values tehre were. Solr is definitely faster, and as fast and or
faste
What version of Solr are you using?
I just tried this with the latest 1.4-dev version, and it works fine.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.sort=true
Note that facet.sort=true/false has been deprecated in Solr 1.4
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParame
Did anybody get chance to look at this. I looked at the previous posts on
wordnet but didn't help much.
Cheers,
Nilya wrote:
>
> I have been trying to integrate wordnet dictionary with solr. I used below
> link to generate indexes using prolog package from wordnet.
> http://chencer.com/tech
cool np, i just didnt want to duplicate code if that already existed.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Joe Calderon wrote:
>> i have a pretty basic question, is there an existing analyzer that
>> limits the number of words/tokens indexed fr
I have a question regarding the use of the WordDelimiterFilter in the text
field in the example schema.xml. The parameters are set differently for the
indexing and querying. Namely, catenateWords and catenateNumbers are set
differently. Shouldn't the same analysis be done at both index and query
hi, one thing of interest, in lucene's contrib (in the memory package...
kinda a confusing place), there is a wordnet synonym filter.
if you look at its test you can get an idea of how it works:
TestSynonymTokenFilter, it reads a testSynonyms.txt (a mini wordnet file for
testing purposes)
On Tue
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> I have a question regarding the use of the WordDelimiterFilter in the text
> field in the example schema.xml. The parameters are set differently for the
> indexing and querying. Namely, catenateWords and catenateNumbers are set
> differently. Sh
Hi there,
I need some help about the mergeindex command. I have 2 cores A and B
that I want to merge into a new index RES. A has 100 docs and B 10
docs. All of B's docs are from A, except that one attribute is
changed. The goal is to bring the updated attributes from B into A.
When I issue the merg
27 matches
Mail list logo
