I have noticed that the response of the commands to deal with the cores
administration can't show the result using php or phps reponseWriter.
Despite passing the command wt=php the result will show always in xml. Json
and ruby responseWriters work well. I am with a nightly from middle June.
Didn't
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Francis Yakin wrote:
>
> Can I transport the index from Solr 1.2 to Sol 1.3 without
> resubmiting/reloading again from Database?
>
>
Yes, that should be possible. However, once you write from 1.3, you will not
be able to read it from 1.2.
Also, if you have a mas
this should have happened because of the fix for SOLR-1121
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> I have noticed that the response of the commands to deal with the cores
> administration can't show the result using php or phps reponseWriter.
> Despite passing the command wt=php
hi guys.
I've noticed that one of the new features in Solr 1.4 is the Termscomponent
which enables the Autosuggest.
but what puzzles me is how to actually use it in an application.
most autosuggests are case insensitive, so there is no difference if I type
in 'San Francisco' or 'san francisco'.
So, shouldn't it be happening in current trunk? I have looked at the
patch-1121 and php response writers doesn't apear... could I fix it myself
adding the php RW in there?
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote:
>
> this should have happened because of the fix for SOLR-1121
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009
?q=facetFormat_product_s:"Pfqs ePub eBook Sfqs" - return correct results
with all the documents which
have "Pfqs ePub eBook Sfqs" in field facetFormat_product_s.
However it does not work with Dismaxrequest.
Also ?q=facetFormat_product_s:"Pfqs Boxed set Sfqs"&qt=dismaxrequest works
perfectly fi
hi mark,
yes . But i shall fix it anyway
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> So, shouldn't it be happening in current trunk? I have looked at the
> patch-1121 and php response writers doesn't apear... could I fix it myself
> adding the php RW in there?
>
> Noble Paul നോബിള്
could I fix it myself adding the php RW in there?
nope. the core admin does not have a place where you can add a writer
2009/6/19 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> hi mark,
> yes . But i shall fix it anyway
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>>
>> So, shouldn't it be happening
fixed
2009/6/19 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> could I fix it myself adding the php RW in there?
>
> nope. the core admin does not have a place where you can add a writer
>
> 2009/6/19 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
>> hi mark,
>> yes . But i shall fix it anyway
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Thanks, I apreciate the fast you did that.
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote:
>
> fixed
>
> 2009/6/19 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
>> could I fix it myself adding the php RW in there?
>>
>> nope. the core admin does not have a place where you can add a writer
>>
>> 2009/6/19 Noble Paul നോബിള്
Thanks! Even a bit late but it's really useful information!!
hossman wrote:
>
>
> Marc: I know it's been a while since you asked this question, but i didn't
> see any reply ... in general the problem is that a "low" boost is stil la
> boost, it can only improve the score of documents that ma
Hi, I just thought I'd note that upgrading to the 1.4 nightlies solved
my problem.
kind regards,
Tarjei
On 06/17/2009 02:38 PM, tarjei wrote:
Hi, I'm having memory problems on one of my Solr slaves:
SEVERE: Error during auto-warming of
key:org.apache.solr.search.queryresult...@563c7832:java.lan
On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:37 AM, prerna07 wrote:
Hi,
I want to perform search with default AND operator on multiple fields.
Below mentioned query works fine with AND operator and one field :
?q={!lucene q.op=AND df=prdMainTitle_product_s}Ladybird Shrinkwrap
However as soon as I add two fields,
Hi,
Using solr 1.3
Where can I read thorough explanation how solrconfig and shema are
interalted and how all those requests etc work.
For example here...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponentI read YOU WILL
LIKELY WANT TO BIND THE COMPONENT TO THE /select STANDARD REQUEST
HANDLER
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> Marc: I know it's been a while since you asked this question, but i didn't
> see any reply ... in general the problem is that a "low" boost is stil la
> boost, it can only improve the score of documents that match.
>
> one way to fake a "
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Julian Davchev wrote:
> Hi,
> Using solr 1.3
> Where can I read thorough explanation how solrconfig and shema are
> interalted and how all those requests etc work.
>
There are wiki pages with details on solrconfig.xml and schema.xml
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/S
Hi Brett,
Well, I'm running Solr in Jetty with JBoss, so I used the JBoss method
of specifying properties (properties-service.xml). However, you can supply
the solr-home to the command-line when you start Jetty by using a parameter
like, "-Dsolr.solr.home=C:\solr". You can do it like how they
The recent discussion of filter queries has got me thinking about other ways to
improve performance of our app. We have an index with a lot of fields and we
support both single-search-box style queries using DisMax and fielded search
using the standard query handler. We also support using both
I am straggling with search result order of Solr.
I indexed a English-certain language dictionary to Solr.
Then below is the result of query="apple" and I am confused with this. Why
doesn't "apple" come first and then Apple ?
I'd like to have your suggestion to fix this to more. I am really stres
Add &debugQuery=true and look at the enlightening scoring explanations.
Erik
On Jun 19, 2009, at 11:23 AM, akinori wrote:
I am straggling with search result order of Solr.
I indexed a English-certain language dictionary to Solr.
Then below is the result of query="apple" and I am conf
Sorry below is full "schema.xml"
I'm trying to figure out the best solution to the following issue.
We've got three boxes in our replication set up - one master and two
load balanced slaves, all of which serve Solr using Tomcat. Given
this setup, we're also using the Drupal apachesolr module, which
currently supports only one "So
We had a similar issue using acts_as_solr. We already had lighttpd
running on some servers so we just proxied all requests for /solr/CORE/
update to the master and /solr/CORE/select to a load balanced IP for
our slaves.
Doug
On Jun 19, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Mark A. Matienzo wrote:
I'm tryin
Hi,
I am facing very strange issue with query with dismaxrequest.
Issue: I am Querying solr for field specific value, Query is returning
correct results with "Pfqs Cassette Sfqs" while it does not work with "Pfqs
ePub eBook Sfqs".
Sample queries:
?q=facetFormat_product_s:"Pfqs ePub eBook Sf
MilkDud schrieb:
Michael Ludwig-4 wrote:
What do you expect the user to enter?
* "dream theater innocence faded" - certainly wrong
* dream theater "innocence faded" - much better
Most likely they would just enter dream theater innocence faded, no
quotes. Without any quotes around any fields,
> ?q=facetFormat_product_s:"Pfqs ePub eBook Sfqs"&qt=dismaxrequest - dose
> not
> return results,
> although field facetFormat_product_s is defined in dismaxrequest
> Handler of
> solrconfig.xml
When you use the dismax handler, you don't need to specify the field in the
query string. It's meant
: Let's say I post a document on the master server, and the slaves do
: a snappuller/installer via crontab every 1 minutes.
:
: Then between in average 30 seconds, all my search servers are not
: synchronized.
:
: Is there a way to improve this situation ?
If your slaves all use NTP to ke
We are experiencing slowness during reloading/resubmitting index from Database
to the master.
We have two environments:
QA and Prod.
The slowness is happened only in Production but not in QA.
It only takes one hours to reload 2.5Mil indexes compare 5-6 hours to load the
same size of index in
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Andrew McCombe wrote:
: I have a field defined in schema.xml as an integer which should
: contain either 0,1,2,10 or 11 values but my results documents are
: showing this as either 'true' or 'false'. the majority of the half
: million documents have this field as 0 or 1 but ar
: I was interested in this recently and also couldn't find anything on the
: wiki. I found this in the list archive:
FWIW...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XMLResponseFormat?highlight=%28version%29
-Hoss
: Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 17:35:39 -0400
: From: Jodi Showers
: Subject: Document Boosts don't seem to be having an effect
Jodi: I'm not sure if you ever solved this problem, but FWIW
document boosts get folded into the fieldNorms along with the length and
any field specific boosts you may h
Hi there,
I've got a Solr instance running and am feeding it rich binary documents to
index from a Django application. The setup works just fine with pdf's, etc..
but no matter what type of MS Word document ( doc and docx ) I feed it I
can't get any results when searching for content-related que
: Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:45:25 -0400
: From: Eric Pugh
: Subject: XPath query support in Solr Cell
Not sure if you figured this out, but your error is coming from curl, not
from Solr. curl has a "feature" where it can hit multiple URLs that
differe only by a sequential number in a range. c
TIm: I'm not sure if you figured this out on your own, but what you
describe below is perfectly fine. /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ is where
tomcat is expanding the solr *application* and you have solr configured to
keep it's *data* in /var/solr/data.
If/when you upgrade in the future you can
as far as i understand from the docs, with a schema.xml like this...
required="true" />
uid
any items with the same uid in it should replace existing ones on the
commit .
is this correct ? because it seems that i do not replace, but only
add new records
: Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:34:08 -0700
: From: Francis Yakin
: Subject: RE: Java OutOfmemory error during autowarming
...
: When it is initialized for the first time, how can I change it?
Frnacis, I'm not sure if you already figured this out, but the point of
hte documentation that Chri
Jonathan,
I'd have to test to double-check how things work when the unique key field is
of type "text", if your "text" type is the same or similar to the one from the
example schema.xml. You probably don't want that field to be of type text.
Maybe int, or maybe string
Otis
--
Sematext -- h
Francis,
I'm not sure if I understood your email correctly, but I think you are saying
you are indexing your DB content into a Solr index. If this is correct, here
are things to look at:
* is the java version the same on both machines (QA vs. PROD)
* are the same java parameters being used on
Hi Mark,
Would it work to pus something like Apache (or any LB or any other simpler
tool) in front of your cluster and configure it to use mod_proxy or mod_rewrite
to pass requests to appropriate backend Tomcat instance depending on the
original URL?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/
Hello,
If you first indexed "apple" and then you indexed "Apple" and if you are
lowercasing this text before indexing (i.e. using LowerCaseFilterFactory), then
if you search for "apple", you should fist get "apple", and then "Apple". If
you first indexed "Apple" and then "apple", then a searc
Thank you for your input to such a beginner.
I did'nt think that I had to do something for sorting when I get search
result. I originally thought Solr would automatically sort.
I think the result is the order I indexed. So how could I get so-called
"dictionally ordered" result?
Many thanks!
H
Can you share your schema for the fields you are indexing, the
configuration of the ExtractingRequestHandler and what your requests
look like? Also, can you share what the output of the extract only
stuff looks like?
Also, can you post .doc files to the example per http://wiki.apache.org/s
Hello,
You can sort by field by adding &sort=fieldname+asc or &sort=fieldname+desc to
your search request URLs
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#head-9f40612b42721ed9e1979a4a80d68f4f8524e9b4
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Mes
Hello,
I'm not sure what the question is. You may also want to include an example of
what you are doing.
Note that results are typically ordered based on the score of the match for
each result/hit, not purely the boost, unless you created your own Similarity
that ignores all other scoring fac
Thanks Chris for the update.
Right now we still having constant issue with our Production slaves.
Do you think when I upgrade Solr to 1.3.0 this will fix the issue. I heard that
in 1.3.0 there is parameter that you can set:
200
Francis
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:
* is the java version the same on both machines (QA vs. PROD) - YES
* are the same java parameters being used on both machines - YES
* is the connection to the DB the same on both machines - Not sure,
need to ask the network guy
* are both the PROD and QA DB servers the same and are
Francis,
So it could easily be that your QA and PROD DBs are really just simply
different (different amount of data, different network speed, different
hardware...)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Francis Yakin
> To: "s
"text" is likely analyzing to multiple terms which is incorrect for a
uid type of field. set it to type="string" instead. and reindex from
scratch.
Erik
On Jun 19, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
as far as i understand from the docs, with a schema.xml like this...
The amount of data in Prod is about 20% more than QA.
We tested the network speed is fine. The hardware in Prod is larger and more
powerful than QA.
But QA is faster during reload. It takes QA only one hour than 6 hours in Prod.
That's why we don't understand what's the reason, the amount of dat
49 matches
Mail list logo
