Yes Mark Miller,
I changed the Connector specification in attach-debugger dialog,
from SocketAttach TO socketListen.
Now i got the netbeans debugger-console output as,
Listening on 5005
But, nothing will be display after that, but the progress shows,
attaching debugger
What is the problem
how to create a custom update handler, to update my fields... ?
Also, how to make the update, through url, i mean,
http://localhost:8983/solr/update/../ like that... ???
noor wrote:
Yes, i changed "custom" into "/custom", now it calls my class.
But, in browser, It shows
Null RequestHandl
>Fergus McMenemie schrieb:
>
>> The article could explain the difference between fq= and
>> facet.query= and when you should use one in preference to
>> the other.
>
>My understanding is that while these query modifiers rely on the
>same implementation (cached filters) to boost performa
Hi everyone,How can I allow Solr to search for all cases like upper case or
lower case in Solr?
Best regards,
Leakhina
hi,
You can create a field with class="Solr.TextField" which needs a
LowerCaseFilterFactory in the index and query analyzers e.g.
So when I use LowerCaseFilterFactory, I can search with upper case and lower
case right?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V. <
mar...@buyways.nl> wrote:
> hi,
>
>
> You can create a field with class="Solr.TextField" which needs a
> LowerCaseFilterFactory in the index and
Indeed, as it will LowerCase all tokens during indextime and querytime
so the term LowerCaseFilterFactory will (aside from some tokenizer)
enter the index as lowercasefilterfactory. Then, any searchterm will
also be lowercased so the searchterm LOWERCASEFILTERFACTORY will match
because on querytime
please take a look at one of the updatehandlers which are already there
XmlUpdateRequestHandler
CSVRequestHandler
BinaryUpdateRequestHandler
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:34 PM, noor wrote:
> how to create a custom update handler, to update my fields... ?
> Also, how to make the update, through url, i
Hi,
Some questions about an integer with numFacetFound for facets in solr:
Our application "tecfinder" has a faceted browsing with paging for each
facet
(see "Fachgebiete" in
http://tecfinder.fiz-technik.de/tecfinder/faces/facelets/search/search.jsp?query=Laser
).
Currently I am integrating sol
Hello,
Answers inlined.
- Original Message
> 1. Is it possible to query from another index folder (say index1) in
> solr?
You don't really query *from* an index, so I'm not sure what exactly you mean.
However, you can query Solr remotely, if that's what you mean, for exampl
Hi,
I am looking for some way to integrate Solr with Terracotta.
There is already an issue logged in Solr JIRA:
http://jira.terracotta.org/jira/browse/CDV-399
But it is logged almost 2 years back.
Is the integration with Terracotta possible in the latest release (1.3.0)?
Thanks
- Bhushan
DISC
Can someone explain this?
+myField:"\*" +city:Mumbai gives me all results for +city:Mumbai
myField is a regular text field and "*" is not a stopword.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> >>
> >> Probably th
Rakhi Khatwani schrieb:
1. Is it possible to query from another index folder (say
index1) in solr?
I think you're looking for the multi-core feature.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
2. Is it possible to query 2 indexes(folders index1 and ind
Solr (1.4) now has a DirectoryFactory, so it would be much easier to
try this out.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:29 AM,
bhushan_mahale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for some way to integrate Solr with Terracotta.
>
> There is already an issue logged in Solr JIR
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> Can someone explain this?
> +myField:"\*" +city:Mumbai gives me all results for +city:Mumbai
>
> myField is a regular text field and "*" is not a stopword.
* and other non alphanumerics are probably being dropped by WordDelimiterFilter.
-Yoni
Thanks Yonik!
Cheers
Avlesh
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> > Can someone explain this?
> > +myField:"\*" +city:Mumbai gives me all results for +city:Mumbai
> >
> > myField is a regular text field and "*" is not a stop
Hey Yonik,
Thanks for the reply.
Can I use something like Compass for the integration?
(http://www.terracotta.org/web/display/orgsite/Lucene+Integration)
The idea is to change Solr code at the places where it uses
lucene.store.directory.
Use the TerracottaDirectory (provided by Compass) inste
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM,
bhushan_mahale wrote:
> The idea is to change Solr code at the places where it uses
> lucene.store.directory.
> Use the TerracottaDirectory (provided by Compass) instead.
I thought Teracotta could work directly on RAMDirectory somehow... but
trying out the implem
Hello list,
I am having the following query,
q=+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z TO
2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]
If I try this query in the browser directly , it is working fine and the url
is encoded automatically in the browser when I enter as follows
http://localhost
I'm trying to prevent a search from going across multiple values in a
multivalued field and am running into an issue. From what I've read, the
standard way to do this is with a positionIncrementGap that is larger than
the ps value. However, I can't make this a phrase query because there is
anoth
I'd like to have a MLT query return similar docs, but the fl for those mlt
docs should be different from the main fl. For example, the main fl is "*,
score" -- but I only want the title and id in my MLT results. Is this
possible?
Matt
>
> qryString = "+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z
> TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]";
> URLEncoder.encode(qryString, "UTF-8");
>
You don't have to encode the complete query string parameter. You just need
encode the values for individual query paramters.
So it should be mor
Hi,
When doing range queries it seems the query is either x:[5 TO 8] which
means 5 <= x <= 8 or x:{5 TO 8} which means 5 < x < 8. But how do you
get one half exclusive, the other inclusive for double fields the
following: 5 <= x < 8? Is this possible?
Regards,
gwk
Thanks for your reply..
If that is the case, I need to do as follows,
"+text:" + URLEncoder.encode("test", "UTF-8") +URLEncoder.encode(" ",
"UTF-8")+"+site_id"+URLEncoder.encode(xx, "UTF-8")
Do I need to encode the space between two search field also? It is difficult
for me to do lik
Hey there,
As I understood documentation, to have TermVectors will help to MoreLikeThis
in performance side but the similitude of the results will be the same. Am I
correct?
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/MoreLikeThis-and-TermVectors-tp24057914p24057914.
Hi all,
is there a way to find out how many documents are "pending" when
having autocommit enabled?
best
Ingo
--
Ingo Renner
TYPO3 Core Developer, Release Manager TYPO3 4.2
They should be, assuming the Analysis process creates the same tokens
with the same frequency as was created when the Term Vectors were
created.
On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
Hey there,
As I understood documentation, to have TermVectors will help to
MoreLikeThis
in p
Thanks for the advice. Glad you like the site! Yes, we are using the
new multi-select support to do this. At first, we wrote our own client-
side solution to allow for multi-select which was super complex but
moved to the built-in solr support as soon as we found it. Excellent
feature!
-Na
Hi,
I think the square brackets/curly braces need to be balanced, so this is
currently not doable with existing query parsers.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: gwk
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 1
Ingo,
I believe that's still visible on the Statistics page of the Solr Admin UI.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Ingo Renner
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:33:05 PM
> Subject: Uncommi
Matt,
Maybe I'm missing something, but can't you use mlt.fl in the URL?
Please see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis#head-6460069f297626f2a982f1e22ec5d1519c456b2c
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Matt Mitchell
> To:
Phil Hagelberg writes:
> Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् writes:
>
>> if you removed the files while the slave is running , then the slave
>> will not know that you removed the files (assuming it is a *nix box)
>> and it will serve the search requests. But if you restart the slave ,
>> it should have
This feature is very important to me .. should I post something on the dev
forum? Not sure what the proper protocol is for adding a feature to the
roadmap
Thanks,
Brian.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Query-Filter-fq-with-OR-operator-tp23895837p24059181.html
Sent from t
Regarding that 3rd answer below:
Yes, that's what most people do, though nothing prevents the indexing client
from sending the same doc to multiple shards. In some scenarios that's exactly
what you want to do.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original
Hi-
I'm trying to use the LukeRequestHandler with an index of ~9 million
docs. I know that counting the top / distinct terms for each field is
expensive and can take a LONG time to return.
Is there a faster way to check the number of documents for each field?
Currently this gets the doc count f
Brian,
Opening a JIRA issue if it doesn't already exist is the best way. If you can
provide a patch, even better!
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: brian519
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
>
> Brian,
>
> Opening a JIRA issue if it doesn't already exist is the best way. If you
> can provide a patch, even better!
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
> Thanks Otis! I've created a JIRA
> https://issues.apache.or
Hi all,
I am stumped trying to get statistics from the Solr server. It seems
that every time I get the correct SolrInfoMBean, when I look up the proper
value (by name) in the NamedList, I get the exact same number back each
time. For example, upon start-up the server reports that "2" queries h
Hi all,
Any ideas on how to use custom Lucene Filter (lucene.search.Filter) in
conjuction with SolrIndexSearcher ?
The case is writing custom Filter performing arbitrary records
selection and AND-ing it to the existing filters passed in the query.
However, the ResponseBuilder filters are
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Aleksandar Bradic wrote:
> Any ideas on how to use custom Lucene Filter (lucene.search.Filter) in
> conjuction with SolrIndexSearcher ?
You can wrap the original query with a FilteredQuery class, or create
a DocSet from the Filter via SolrIndexSearcher.convertFilte
How about this: x:[5 TO 8] AND x:{0 TO 8}
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the square brackets/curly braces need to be balanced, so this is
> currently not doable with existing query parsers.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- ht
doc count for each term is stored directly in the index - with the big
caveat that it doesn't take deleted docs into account. That addresses
the "get doc count for each term".
"get doc count for each field" is a different question... see below.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Ryan McKinley wrot
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Is there a faster way to check the number of documents for each field?
Currently this gets the doc count for each term:
In the past, I've created a field that contains the names of the
Fields present on the document. Then, simply facet on
Hi,
I have this standard query:
q=(field1:hello OR field2:hello) AND (field3:world)
Can I use dismax handler for this (applying the same search term on field1 and
field2, but keep field3 with something separate)? If it can be done, what's the
advantage of doing it this way over using the s
Ah, right.
FilteredQuery works just great
Thanks, Yonik
Best,
.Alek
On Jun 16, 2009, at 9:45 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Aleksandar
Bradic wrote:
Any ideas on how to use custom Lucene Filter (lucene.search.Filter)
in
conjuction with SolrIndexSearcher ?
You c
Hi,
Solr is throwing Null pointer exception when soring on a field.
http://localhost:9080/solr/select?version=2.2&q=*:*&qt=geo&lat=41.883784
&long=-87.637668&radius=25&rows=100&sort=geo_distance%20top
Using 16-June build. Any pointers ??
HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerException a
Looks like this is the local-solr patch, which isn't part of Solr yet?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Nirkhe, Chandra wrote:
> Hi,
> Solr is throwing Null pointer exception when soring on a field.
>
>
> http://localhost:9080/solr/select?version=2.2&q=*:*&q
On Jun 16, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Is there a faster way to check the number of documents for each
field?
Currently this gets the doc count for each term:
In the past, I've created a field that contains the names of th
Haven't tried the 14th build, but the latest stable version is available on
http://www.nsshutdown.com/solr-example.tgz
Built last week
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/localsolr-sort-tp24040799p24065745.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
Does anyone know what date format pass to search in Solr?
Could you give me any examples for search with Date in solr?
Regards,
Leahina
And how about this - x:{5 TO 8} AND x:5
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> How about this: x:[5 TO 8] AND x:{0 TO 8}
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the square brackets/cu
Really sorry, this is what I meant: x:{5 TO 8} OR x:5
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> And how about this - x:{5 TO 8} AND x:5
>
> Cheers
> Avlesh
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
>
>> How about this: x:[5 TO 8] AND x:{0 TO 8}
>>
>>
52 matches
Mail list logo