Re: NPE on MERGEINDEXES

Reopened SOLR-1051: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1051?focusedCommentId=12715030&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12715030 Koji Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Maybe I did something wrong, I got NPE when trying to MERGEINDEXES: > > http://localho

Re: When searching for !...@#$%^&*() all documents are matched incorrectly

Walter, The analysis link does not produce any matches for either @ or !...@#$%^&*() strings when I try to match against bathing. I'm worried that this might be the symptom of another problem (which has not revealed itself yet) and want to get to the bottom of this... Thank you. sm Walter Unde

Re: When searching for !...@#$%^&*() all documents are matched incorrectly

OK, here's the deal: -features:foo features:(\...@#$%\^&\*\(\)) -features:foo features:(\...@#$%\^&\*\(\)) -features:foo -features:foo The text analysis is throwing away non alphanumeric chars (probably the WordDelimiterFilter). The Lucene (and Solr) query parser throws away term queries when th

Re: When searching for !...@#$%^&*() all documents are matched incorrectly

So the fix for this problem would be 1. Stop using WordDelimiterFilter for queries (what is the alternative) OR 2. Not allow any search strings without any alphanumeric characters.. SM. Yonik Seeley-2 wrote: > > OK, here's the deal: > > -features:foo features:(\...@#$%\^&\*\(\)) > -features:

Re: When searching for !...@#$%^&*() all documents are matched incorrectly

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Sam Michaels wrote: > > So the fix for this problem would be > > 1. Stop using WordDelimiterFilter for queries (what is the alternative) OR > 2. Not allow any search strings without any alphanumeric characters.. Short term workaround for you, yes. I would classify

Re: When searching for !...@#$%^&*() all documents are matched incorrectly

Yonik, Done, here is the link. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1196 SM. Yonik Seeley-2 wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Sam Michaels wrote: >> >> So the fix for this problem would be >> >> 1. Stop using WordDelimiterFilter for queries (what is the alternative) >> OR >>

Highlighting and Field options

Hi, The 'content' field that I am indexing is usually large (e.g. a pdf doc of a few Mb in size). I need highlighting to be on. This 'seems' to require that I have to set the 'content' field to be STORED. This returns the whole content field in the search result XML. for each matching document. T

Re: Highlighting and Field options

Use the fl param to ask for only the fields you need, but also keep hl=true. Something like this: http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=bear&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&hl=true&fl=id Note that &fl=id means the only field returned in the XML will be the id field. Highlights are still ret

How to get number of optimizes

Hello, I'm looking for a simple way to automate (in a shell script) a request for the number of times an index has been optimized (since the Solr webapp has last started). I know that this information is available on the Solr stats page (http://host:port/solr/admin/stats.jsp) under Update Handle

Re: How to get number of optimizes

Not sure if it's simpler, but the JMX interface is more structured. I think that just grabbing the page and parsing out the content with your favorite tool (Ruby & Hpricot) is pretty simple. Eric On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:17 PM, iamithink wrote: Hello, I'm looking for a simple way to auto

Re: Keyword Density

HI All, Is there a way to perform filtering based on keyword density? Thanks -- Alex Shevchenko

Re: User search in Facebook like

Thanks a lot for your answer it fixed all my issues !!! It's really well working ! Cheers, Vincent -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/User-search-in-Facebook-like-tp23804854p23818867.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: How to get number of optimizes

Thanks for the quick response. I agree that for this one-off task the grab and parse method works fine, but I'll keep the JMX interface in mind for other tasks in the future. Here's my particular hack solution in case this helps anyone else: wget -q -O- http://hostname:port/solr/admin/stats.jsp

Re: How to get number of optimizes

Hello, That stats page is really XML + XSLT that transforms the XML to HTML. View the source of the stats page. That should make it very easy to parse the stats response/page and extract the data you need. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original M

Re: Keyword Density

Hi Alex, Could you please provide an example of this? Are you looking to do something like "find all docs that match name:foo and where foo appears > N times (in the name field) in the matching document"? Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Mes

RE: Java OutOfmemory error during autowarming

Hi Chris, I am new in solr. When it is initialized for the first time, how can I change it? Thanks Francis -Original Message- From: Chris Harris [mailto:rygu...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 3:00 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Java OutOfmemory error during aut

Re: Keyword Density

Something like that. Just not '> N times' but '/ > ' On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 21:00, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > Could you please provide an example of this? Are you looking to do > something like "find all docs that match name:foo and where foo appears > N > times (in the name field)

Dismax handler phrase matching question

Hello, I'm using the dismax handler for the phrase matching. I have a few legal resources in my index in the following format for example title state dui faq1 california dui faq2 florida dui faq3 federal

Re: Keyword Density

But I don't need to sort using this value. I need to cut results, where this value (for particular term of query!) not in some range. On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 22:20, Walter Underwood wrote: > That is the normal relevance scoring formula in Solr and Lucene. > It is a bit fancier than that, but you d

Re: Keyword Density

That is the normal relevance scoring formula in Solr and Lucene. It is a bit fancier than that, but you don't have to do anything special to get that behavior. Solr also uses the inverse document frequency (rarity) of each word for weighting. Look up "tf.idf" for more info. wunder On 6/1/09 11:

What would be a good date for downloading a stable solr release

We have too many issues with 1.3 running for longer than 12 hours and want to look into a more updated version, either a nightly or a specific svn revision that we can pull to replace it. Any recommendations for a date since the 1.3.0 release 9 months ago? Doesn't have to be super new or anything,

Re: What would be a good date for downloading a stable solr release

What sort of issues? We run Solr 1.3 for days or weeks with almost no problems. We have one odd failure that we haven't been able to reproduce in test, but it is very rare, once or twice per month across five servers. wunder On 6/1/09 12:34 PM, "sroussey" wrote: > > We have too many issues wit

Re: What would be a good date for downloading a stable solr release

Hi, 1.3 is quite solid, so my guess is memory problems may be a question of configuration, inappropriate data input or analysis or inadequate hw. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: sroussey > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

Unable to Search German text

Hi All, I am facing an issue while adding multi language support in the Solr. Here is what I am doing. 1) have a field of type text_de which has analyzer as snowballporterFilterFactory with German2 as language 2) copy the german locationName into this field at the index ti

RE: Unable to Search German text

I found what I was doing wrong. The XML document that I was posting didn't have the char encoding info, due to which the solr was ignoring the special chars. Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli -Original Message- From: Manepalli, Kalyan [mailto:kalyan.manepa...@orbitz.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 20

Solr.war

We are planning to upgrade solr 1.2.0 to 1.3.0 Under 1.3.0 - Which of war file that I need to use and deploy on my application? We are using weblogic. There are two war files under /opt//apache-solr-1.3.0/dist/apache-solr-1.3.0.war and under /opt/apache-solr-1.3.0/example/webapps/solr.war. Wh

Error sorting random field with June 1, 2009 Solr 1.4 nightly

Hey all, I was just wondering if anyone else is getting an error with today's nightly while sorting the random field. Thanks Rob. Jun 1, 2009 4:52:37 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.lucene.search.SortField.getComparator(S

Re: Using Chinese / How to ?

Can you provide details on the errors? I don't think we have a specific how to, but I wouldn't think it would be much different from 1.2 -Grant On May 31, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Fer-Bj wrote: Hello, is there any "how to" already created to get me up using SOLR 1.3 running for a chinese ba

Re: Solr.war

They are identical. solr.war is a copy of apache-solr-1.3.0.war. You may want to look at example target in build.xml: Koji Francis Yakin wrote: We are planning to upgrade solr 1.2.0 to 1.3.0 Under 1.3.0 - Which of war file that I need to use and deploy on my application? We are usi

Filter query results do not match facet counts

I am using the 2009-05-27 build of solr 1.4. Under this build, I get a facet count on my category field named "Seasonal" of 7 values. However, when I do a filter query of 'fq=cat:"Seasonal"', I get only 1 result. I switched back to Solr 1.3 to see if it's a problem with my config. I found that

Re: Using Chinese / How to ?

I'm sending 3 files: - schema.xml - solrconfig.xml - error.txt (with the error description) I can confirm by now that this error is due to invalid characters for the XML format (ASCII 0 or 11). However, this problem now is taking a different direction: how to start using the CJK instead of the e

Solr multiple keyword search as google

Hi, I am using solr nightly bind for my search. I have to search in the location field of the table which is not my default search field. I will briefly explain my requirement below: I want to get the same/similar result when I give location multiple keywords, say "San jose ca USA" or "USA ca

Re: Dismax handler phrase matching question

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:53 AM, anuvenk wrote: > > title state > > dui faq1 california > dui faq2 florida > dui faq3 federal > > Now I want to be able to return federal results irrespective of the state. > For example dui california