As per relevance, no results should be returned. But all the results are
returned in alphabetical order.
Walter Underwood wrote:
>
> I'm really curious. What is the most relevant result for that query?
>
> wunder
>
> On 5/30/09 7:35 PM, "Ryan McKinley" wrote:
>
>> two key things to try (for
Upon some further experimentation, I found out that even @ matches all the
documents. However when I append the wildcard * to @ (@*) then there is no
match...
SM
Sam Michaels wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Solr 1.3/Java 1.6.
>
> When I run a query like - (activity_type:NAME) AND
> title:(
Hello,
I built a feature which allow users to search for other user thanks to a
dynamic text box.
Like facebook, when you search for your friends, the name is display in a
javascript dropdown list with a small picture.
But I'm not completely happy with the search... I'm using a standard search
l
Maybe I did something wrong, I got NPE when trying to MERGEINDEXES:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=MERGEINDEXES&core=core0&indexDirs=indexname
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:55)
at
org.apache.sol
try searching for matches where the name starts with whatever the user has
entered so far with a wildcard
?q=vinc*
Are you always going to be searching for names? If so you could see if the
user has entered two terms and suffix each with a wildcard to get
potentially more relevant searches.
For
Thanks very much, that's solve my problem !
Now I see another question : how can I manage the lower/upper cases in my
search?
Thanks !
Dietrich Featherston-2 wrote:
>
> try searching for matches where the name starts with whatever the user has
> entered so far with a wildcard
>
> ?q=vinc*
>
Here is the output from the debug query when I'm trying to match the String @
against Bathing (should not match)
3.2689073 = (MATCH) weight(activity_type:NAME in 0), product of:
0.9994 = queryWeight(activity_type:NAME), product of:
3.2689075 = idf(docFreq=153, numDocs=1489)
0.30591
Solr offers no configuration for FieldCache, neither in solrconfig.xml nor
anywhere else; rather, that cache gets populated automatically in the depths
of Lucene when you do a sort (or also apparently, as Yonik says, when you
use a field in a function query).
>From the wiki: 'Lucene has a low leve
Hi Vincent,
If I recall correctly a wildcard query does not use any of the filters
defined in your fieldtype (search the news group for this). So using a
LowerCaseFilterFactory does not work and you'll need to do the to lower case
transform yourself on the client side (javascript?).
However, if
Use the [analysis] link on the Solr admin UI to get more info on
how this is being interpreted.
However, I am curious about why this is important. Do users enter
this query often? If not, maybe it is not something to spend time on.
wunder
On 5/31/09 2:56 PM, "Sam Michaels" wrote:
>
> Here is
Hello,
is there any "how to" already created to get me up using SOLR 1.3 running
for a chinese based website?
Currently our site is using SOLR 1.2, and we tried to move into 1.3 but we
couldn't complete our reindex as it seems like 1.3 is more strict when it
comes to special chars.
I would app
Hi,
I am using Solr.In that i am using Standered Request handler.
-
-
-
explicit
-
I am indexed data with that handler.In Our Schema there is a BODY Tag.In
that i stored the document content.
Now i am going to get some Most Interesting tirms from that content With
using More Like this
12 matches
Mail list logo
