I guess it is better to copy the ClobTransformer.class alone and use
the old Solr1.3 DIH
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:50 PM, ahammad wrote:
>
> I have an update:
>
> I played around with it some more and it seems like it's being caused by the
> ClobTransformer. If I remove the 'clob="true"' fr
Hi,
My solution was to this problem in Lucene, that I modified the
Lucene's parser. There was a file in Lucene not in Java
(StandardTokenizer.jj),
which defines what is a token, and the types of tokens. My rule
was, that a soft or hard hypen at the end of the line denote a
word which continues
Hi,
When I'm doing normal search I'm using q=test +field:somevalue&otherparams...
How can I implement this using morelikethis by posting the text and q
is empty? I tried to use fq= but this is not what I want.
Thanks,
Renz
Hi,
I have two instances of embedded server (no http) running on a network with
two separate indexes..
I want to replicate changes from one index to other.
Is there any way??
Thanks,
Ashish
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Index-replication-without-HTTP-tp23739156p23739156.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Ashish P wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have two instances of embedded server (no http) running on a network with
> two separate indexes..
> I want to replicate changes from one index to other.
> Is there any way??
>
EmbeddedSolrServer is meant for small scale usage -- like
Hmm... so in fact it looks like Solr had done a number of commits
already (especially, given how large your generation is -- the "cje"
in segments_cje means there were a number of commits).
Were there any other exceptions leading up to this? Disk full?
Anything unusual in your Solr configuration?
>Oscar - are you on either of these lists? The front page does not
>seem like an appropriate place to list a blog entry. And the
>technique used in that blog entry doesn't seem like a best practice to
>me anyway, though I'd be curious to hear it debated a bit on solr-user
>on ways to offe
I would just move it to the blog page.
On May 26, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Oscar - are you on either of these lists? The front page does not
seem like an appropriate place to list a blog entry. And the
technique used in that blog entry doesn't seem like a best practice
to me
Hi guys!!
I have started studying Solr, and I was wondering if anyone would be so kind
as to help me understand a couple of things.
I have XML data that looks like this:
ID-0
Cheap hotels in Paris?
I want to search the data based on a location hier
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Kir4 wrote:
>
> Hi guys!!
> I have started studying Solr, and I was wondering if anyone would be so kind
> as to help me understand a couple of things.
>
> I have XML data that looks like this:
>
> ID-0
>
> Cheap hotels in Paris?
>
Hmmm, that's probably a good idea...although it does not explain how my
current local setup works.
Can you please explain how this is done? I am assuming that I need to add
the class itself to the source of solr 1.3, and then compile the code, and
take the new .war file and put it in Tomcat? If t
If you are running on Unix/Linux, you should be able to use the
scripts-based replication with some minor modification. You will need to
change the scripts where it try to use HTTP to trigger a commit in Solr.
Bill
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Ashish P wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have two instances
I agree. It is always a good idea to start with the example config/schema
in the version that you are upgrading to and work you specific settings back
into them. Newer versions of Solr will probably have new or changed
settings. Even though sometime the config/shema is backward compatible, I
thi
take the trunk dih.jar. use winzip/winrar or any tool and just delete
all the files other than ClobTransformer.class. put that jar into
solr.home/lib
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:10 PM, ahammad wrote:
>
> Hmmm, that's probably a good idea...although it does not explain how my
> current local setup
Does replication in 1.4 support passing credentials/basic auth? If not
what is the best option to protect replication?
Would I need to rename it or refer to it somewhere? Or can I keep the
existing name (apache-solr-dataimporthandler-1.4-dev.jar)?
Cheers
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote:
>
> take the trunk dih.jar. use winzip/winrar or any tool and just delete
> all the files other than ClobTransformer.clas
no need to rename .
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:50 PM, ahammad wrote:
>
> Would I need to rename it or refer to it somewhere? Or can I keep the
> existing name (apache-solr-dataimporthandler-1.4-dev.jar)?
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote:
>>
>> take the trunk dih.jar. use winzip
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Matthew Gregg wrote:
> Does replication in 1.4 support passing credentials/basic auth? If not
> what is the best option to protect replication?
do you mean protecting the url /replication ?
ideally Solr is expected to run in an unprotected environment. if you
wis
Hello,
I tried your suggestion, and it still gives me the same error.
I'd like to point out again that the same folder/config setup is running on
my machine with no issues, but it gives me that stack trace in the logs on
the server.
When I do the full data import request through the browser, I
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:06 +0530, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Matthew Gregg
> wrote:
> > Does replication in 1.4 support passing credentials/basic auth? If not
> > what is the best option to protect replication?
> do you mean protecting the url /replicati
I've not figured out a way to use basic auth with replication. We
ended up using IP based auth, it shouldn't be too tricky to add
basicauth support as, IIRC, the replication is based on the commons
httpclient library.
On 27 May 2009, at 15:17, Matthew Gregg wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19
The question is what all do you wish to protect.
There are 'read' as well as 'write' attributes .
The reads are the ones which will not cause any harm other than
consuming some cpu cycles.
The writes are the ones which can change the state of the system.
The slave uses the 'read' API's which i f
all I can suggest is write a simple jdbc program and see if it works
from that m/c( any privilege issue etc?)
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:15 PM, ahammad wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried your suggestion, and it still gives me the same error.
>
> I'd like to point out again that the same folder/config s
I would like the to protect both reads and writes. Reads could have a
significant impact. I guess the answer is no, replication has no built
in security?
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 20:11 +0530, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
> The question is what all do you wish to protect.
> There are 'read' as we
replication has no builtin security
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Matthew Gregg wrote:
> I would like the to protect both reads and writes. Reads could have a
> significant impact. I guess the answer is no, replication has no built
> in security?
>
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 20:11 +0530, Noble
That is disappointing then. Restricting by IP may be doable, but much
more work than basic auth.
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 20:41 +0530, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
> replication has no builtin security
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Matthew Gregg
> wrote:
> > I would like the to p
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Gregg wrote:
> That is disappointing then. Restricting by IP may be doable, but much
> more work than basic auth.
>
>
The beauty of open source is that this can be changed :)
Please open an issue, we can have basic http authentication made
configurable.
Bug filed. Thankyou.
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 22:40 +0530, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Gregg wrote:
>
> > That is disappointing then. Restricting by IP may be doable, but much
> > more work than basic auth.
> >
> >
> The beauty of open source is that this
I can set the boost of a field or doc at index time using the boost attr in
the update message, e.g.
pet
But that won't work for multivalued fields according to the RelevancyFAQ
pet
animal
( I assume it applies the last boost parsed to all terms? )
Now, say I'd like to do index-time boosting of
i undestand what you say
but the problem i have is
user can make query like this:
//tei.2//p"[quijote"]
user want to find all paragraph that belong to tei.2 and have the word
"quijote"
then i have to search structure and content, because i have the and index
format to save the structure and the
On May 27, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Yosvanys Aponte wrote:
i undestand what you say
but the problem i have is
user can make query like this:
//tei.2//p"[quijote"]
A couple of problems with this... for one, there's no query parser
that'll interpret that syntax as you mean it in Solr. And also,
I've been experimenting with the XML + Solr combo too. What I've found to be
a good working solution is to:
pick out the nodes you want as solr documents (every div1 or div2 etc.)
index the text only (with lots of metadata fields)
add a field for either the xpath to that node, or
save the indivi
If you really, really need to do XML-smart queries, go ahead and buy
MarkLogic. I've worked with the principle folk there and they are
really sharp. Their engine is awesome. XML search is hard, and you
can't take a regular search engine, even a really good one, and make
it do full XML without tons
Nice and timely topic for me.
You may find this this interesting:
http://www.jroller.com/otis/entry/xml_dbs_vs_search_engines
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Walter Underwood
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed
34 matches
Mail list logo
