Hi,
I'm sending 15K records at once using Solrj (server.addBeans(...))
and have two threads writing to same index. One thread goes fine, but
the second thread always fails with,
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
org.apache.commons.httpclient.ProtocolException: Unbuffered entity
Yes, you are correct. But the documentation for DIH says the column names are
case insensitive. That should be fixed. Here is what it says:
=
A shorter data-config
In the above example, there are mappings of fields to Solr fields. It is
possible to totally avoid the field entries in
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 7:15 PM, ashokc wrote:
>
> Yes, you are correct. But the documentation for DIH says the column names
> are
> case insensitive. That should be fixed. Here is what it says:
>
> =
> A shorter data-config
>
> In the above example, there are mappings of fields to Sol
I am not sure if this is a really easy or newbee-ish type question.
I would like to implement a search within these results type feature.
Has anyone done this and could you please share some tips, pointers and
or documentation on how to implement this.
Thanks
Vern
I am planning to configure a solr server with multiple cores with
different schema for themselves with a single solr.solr.home . Are
there any examples in the wiki to the wiki ( the ones that I see have
a single schema.xml for a given solr.solr.home under schema directory.
).
Thanks for helping po
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Rakesh Sinha wrote:
> I am planning to configure a solr server with multiple cores with
> different schema for themselves with a single solr.solr.home . Are
> there any examples in the wiki to the wiki ( the ones that I see have
> a single schema.xml for a given sol
Hi, Vernon.
In Blacklight, the way we've been doing this is just to stack queries
on top of each other. It's a conceptual shift from the way one might
think about "search within", but it accomplishes the same thing. For
example:
search1 ==> q=horse
search2 ==> q=horse AND dog
The second
Bess,
I think that might work I'll try it out and see how it works for my case.
thanks
Bess Sadler wrote:
Hi, Vernon.
In Blacklight, the way we've been doing this is just to stack queries
on top of each other. It's a conceptual shift from the way one might
think about "search within", but i
This post describes the search-within-search implementation.
http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.html
Shashi
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Vernon Chapman wrote:
> Bess,
>
> I think that might work I'll try it out and see how it works for my case.
>
> thanks
That worked. Thanks again.
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> the column names are case sensitive try this
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:58 AM, ashokc wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I need to assign multiple values to a field, with each value coming from
>> a
>> different column of
On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:25 AM, dabboo wrote:
Erik,
Thanks a lot for your reply. I have made some changes in the solr
code and
now field clauses are working fine with dismax request. Not only this,
wildcard characters are also working with dismax and q query
parameter.
If you want I can sh
Hi TIA,
I have the same desired requirement. If you look up in the archives,
you might find a similar thread between myself and the always super
helpful Erik Hatcher. Basically, it can't be done (right now).
You can however use the "ExtractOnly" request handler, and just get
the extracted text
12 matches
Mail list logo
