Shalin, thanks for the pointer.
The following data-config.xml worked. The trick was realising
that EVERY entity tag needs to have its own datasource, I guess
I had been assuming that it was implicit for certain processors.
The whole thing is confusing in that there is both the dataSource
element(
Hello all,
I have the following DIH data-config.xml file. Adding
HTMLStripTransformer and the associated stripHTML on the
para tag seems to have broke things. I am using a nightly
build from 12-jan-2009
The /record/sect1/para contains HTML sub tags which need
to be discarded. Is my use of stri
Hi Fergus,
The idea here is that if you do not give a name to your data source, then it
is the 'default' data source and gets used automatically by all entities. If
you decide to give a name to the data source, then it should be specified
for each entity.
Even when you have multiple data sources,
This looks fine. Can you post the stack trace?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have the following DIH data-config.xml file. Adding
> HTMLStripTransformer and the associated stripHTML on the
> para tag seems to have broke things. I am using a nightly
>
>This looks fine. Can you post the stack trace?
>
Yep, here is the juicy bit. Let me know if you need more.
Jan 19, 2009 11:08:03 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
INFO: Server startup in 2390 ms
Jan 19, 2009 11:14:06 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [janesdocs] webapp=/s
Hmmm,
Just to clarify I retested the thing using the nightly as of today
18-jan-2009. The problem is still there and this traceback is from
that nightly.
>>This looks fine. Can you post the stack trace?
>>
>Yep, here is the juicy bit. Let me know if you need more.
>
>Jan 19, 2009 11:08:03 AM org
Hi,
I'm using Solr's MoreLikeThese functionality for a rudimentary related
products system, but we need it to only return related products that
match certain criteria. For example, we don't want to see any related
products that are discontinued. I'm having difficulty figuring out if
there's a
Hi,
Have you tried to add a filter directly to the /solr/mlt?q=-request?
Try to add "&fq=available:yes", and see if you can limit the
MoreLikeThis-documents to documents that has "yes" in the
"available"-field. I have had some success with this approach.
/Clas, Frisim.com
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009
I think the problem might be that I'm using the standard handler with
the mlt:true parameter. The MLT handler doesn't seem to be mentioned in
my config file, do you know how I can enable it?
Regards,
Andrew Ingram
Clas Rydergren wrote:
Hi,
Have you tried to add a filter directly to the /solr
Ah, it needs a null check for multi valued fields. I've committed a fix to
trunk. The next nightly build should have it. You can checkout and build
from the trunk if need this immediately.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> Just to clarify I retested the thing u
I am running into the same problem. I found that I can successfully run the
"ping" request. For example: http://localhost:7101/solr/admin/ping
But all other requests to the Admin page fail.
KSY wrote:
>
> I hit a major roadblock while trying to get Solr 1.3 running on WebLogic
> 10.0.
>
Hi,
Even if you use the /solr/select-version of MLT, I guess that just
adding the fq-parameter may work.
If you would like to add the MLT request handler, add something like
title,data
1
as a request handler plugin in your solrconfig.xml file. If you are
running on Tom
Thanks, I'll try this.
I tried using the /select version and the problem was that fq applies
only to the original query rather than the mlt results which are
effectively separate queries.
Clas Rydergren wrote:
Hi,
Even if you use the /solr/select-version of MLT, I guess that just
adding th
Ah, I see. I have, more or less, only used the MoreLikeThis (single
document) version, and the fq-filter is then applied to the (only)
query that is made. Sorry.
/Clas
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
> Thanks, I'll try this.
>
> I tried using the /select version and the
Hi,
We're evaluating the use of Solr for use in a web application. I've got the
web application configured to use an embedded instance of Solr for queries
(setup as a slave), and a remote instance for writes (setup as a master).
The replication scripts are running fine and the embedded slave do
Thank you Shalin, I'm in the process of implementing your suggestion,
and it works marvelously. Had to upgrade to solr 1.3, and had to hack
up acts_as_solr to function correctly.
Is there a way to receive a search for a given field, and have solr
know to automatically check the two fields? I sup
Hi everyone,
I'd like to see how much I can reduce the startup time of jetty/solr.
Right now I have it at about 3s - that's fast, but I'd like to see how
close to zero I can get it.
I've minimized my schema and solrconfig down to what I use (my solr
needs are pretty vanilla). Now I'm looking at
Hi all, I have 20 indices, each ~10GB in size, being searched by a single
Solr slave instance (using the multicore features in a slightly old 1.2 dev
build)
I'm getting unpredictable, but inevitable, OutOfMemoryError from the slave,
and I have no more physical memory to throw at the problem (HotSpo
On 19-Jan-09, at 2:44 PM, James Brady wrote:
Hi all, I have 20 indices, each ~10GB in size, being searched by a
single
Solr slave instance (using the multicore features in a slightly old
1.2 dev
build)
I'm getting unpredictable, but inevitable, OutOfMemoryError from the
slave,
and I have n
Your 3 instances are trying to acquire the physical lock to the index.
If you want to use multi-threaded indexing, I would suggest http interface,
as Solr will control the request queue for you and index as much docs as it
can receive from your open threads (resource wise obviously).
2009/1/19 Sa
Do they show up if you use non-embedded? That is, if you hit that
slave over HTTP from your browser, are the changes showing up?
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:18 AM, edre...@ha wrote:
Hi,
We're evaluating the use of Solr for use in a web application. I've
got the
web application configured to
We want boosting of results for ?q=dateField:[NOW-45DAYS TO NOW] and
?q=DateField:[NOW TO NOW+45DAYS]
below mentioned fq tag gives me error
dateField:[NOW-45DAYS TO NOW]^1.0 DateField:[NOW TO
NOW+45DAYS]^1.0
Please suggest the syntax of fields defined in fq tag?
tHAnks,
Prerna
Erik Hatcher
Good days gentlemen.
in my search engine i have 4 groups of text:
1) user address
2) user description
3) ...
4) ...
I want to give users ability to search all of them with ability to
conjunction selection for searching some of them. conjunction means that
user should be able to search 1) and 2)
Hi,
I am using the following analyser for indexing and querying -
--
Java 1.5 has thread-locking bugs. Switching to Java 1.6 may cure this
problem.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jerome L Quinn wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
>
> I'm running solr 1.3 inside Tomcat 6.0.18. I'm running a modified query
> parser, tokenizer, highlighter, and have a CustomScoreQuery for dates
25 matches
Mail list logo
