Re: Delete / filter / hide query results

Please I really need some help to solve this. Does anybody have even a little idea ? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Delete---filter---hide-query-results-tp21287332p21326944.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Solr query for date

Hi, what will be the syntax of this sql query SELECT * FROM table WHERE date > SYSDATE and date http://www.nabble.com/Solr-query-for-date-tp21327696p21327696.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr query for date

Is this necessary to define date_field as in schema.xml. OR Solr query can work on text field type ? Akshay-8 wrote: > > You can use DateMath as: > > date_field:[NOW TO NOW+45DAYS] > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, prerna07 wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> what will be the syntax of this sql

Re: date range query performance

On Jan 6, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Jim Adams wrote: Can someone explain what this means to me? The below definition sets the timestamp field without time granularity, just day. It's the difference between, say you've indexed a document for every millisecond in a day (what is that, 86.4M?), an

Re: Solr query for date

You can use DateMath as: date_field:[NOW TO NOW+45DAYS] On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, prerna07 wrote: > > Hi, > > what will be the syntax of this sql query > SELECT * FROM table WHERE date > SYSDATE and date in solr format ? > > I need to fetch records where date is between current date

Clustering Carrot2 + Solr

Hi! I want to establish a system of clustering but i don't know how i must realize this operation. I have seen that the use of SOLR-769 Patch was advised but I don't know what I must do with clustering-libs.tar and SOLR-769.patch. Can you explain me the procedure to run clustering with Solr and Ca

Re: date range query performance

You'll have to search the archives for a more complete explanation, I'm going from memory here.. (or perhaps it's on the Wiki, I don't remember). The notion is to break apart your timestamp (if you really, really need the precision) into several fields rather than one. I.e. index the MMDD as o

Is there any better way to configure db-data-config.xml

Hi, I am using the following schema - http://www.nabble.com/file/p21332196/table_stuct.gif 1. INSTITUTION table is the main table that has information about all the institutions. 2. INSTITUTION_TYPE table has 'institute_type' and its 'description' for each 'institute_type_id' in the INSTITUTI

Re: Partitioning the index

that is what I thought. Thanks. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > You'll need to re-index. > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Jim Adams wrote: > > > It's a range query. I don't have any faceted data. > > > > Can I limit the precision of

encountered the "Cannot allocate memory" when calling snapshooter program after optimize command

Hi, I configured solr to listen on postOptimize event and call the snapshooter program after an optimize command. It works well when the Java heap size is set to less than 4G. But if I increased the java heap size to 5G, the snapshooter program can't be successfully called after the optimize

Solr expert(s) needed

I would like to build a search engine that indexes online videos from such websites as metacafe, youtube, etc. I want to use the best open-source Solr as the indexing tool with Nutch as web crawler. However, I have difficulties integrating these two open source products. So I am seeking for help an

Plans for 1.3.1?

Hi, all. Are there any plans for putting together a bugfix release? I'm not looking for particular bugs, but would like to know if bug fixes are only going to be done mixed in with new features. Thanks, Jerry Quinn

Re: Plans for 1.3.1?

there are plans for a regular release (1.4) later this month. No plans for bug fix release. If there are critical bugs there would be a bug fix release, but not for minor ones. On Jan 7, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Jerome L Quinn wrote: Hi, all. Are there any plans for putting together a bugfi

Re: Plans for 1.3.1?

That is fantastic! Will the Java replication support be included in this release? Thanks, - Bill -- From: "Ryan McKinley" Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:42 AM To: Subject: Re: Plans for 1.3.1? there are plans for a regular release (1.4)

Re: encountered the "Cannot allocate memory" when calling snapshooter program after optimize command

Justin, Please check solr-user archive on markmail.org and search for "overcommit" or even "Whitman" to find a recent thread that I believe has the answer to this question. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Justin Yao > To:

Re: Clustering Carrot2 + Solr

Hi, Most likely (didn't look at SOLR-769) you need to: 1) apply the patch 2) untar the .tar file and copy the jars from it to solr home's lib/ dir But the patch may be outdated and may not apply cleanly. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Messag

Re: cannot allocate memory for snapshooter

Brian Whitman wrote: On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote: Hey Brian, I didn't catch what OS you are using on EC2 by the way. I thought most UNIX OS's were using memory overcommit - A quick search brings up Linux, AIX, and HP-UX, and maybe even OSX? What are you running over t

Re: Plans for 1.3.1?

yes. check: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt for stuff that is already in 1.4 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310230&fixfor=12313351 for stuff that may be

Re: debugging long commits

Hi Brian, You might want to follow up on the Lucene list (java-u...@lucene.apache.org ). Something was causing problems with the merging and thus you ended up with too many segments (hence the slow commits). I doubt that you lost anything--usually the merge function doesn't modify the ind

Re: Subscribe Me

Kalidoss, You can subscribe here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/mailing_lists.html regards, -Mike On 5-Jan-09, at 4:19 AM, kalidoss wrote: Thanks, kalidoss.m, ** DISCLAIMER ** Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Sify Limited and is inten

Re: Plans for 1.3.1?

Thanks, Ryan! It is great that Solr replication (SOLR-561) is included in this release. One thing I want to confirm (if Noble, Shalin et al) can help: I had encountered an issue a while back (in late October I believe) with using SOLR-561. I was getting an error (AlreadyClosedException) from

Re: Setting up DataImportHandler for Oracle datasource on JBoss

Thanks Paul, that fixed the problem. the root node is not it should be -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Setting-up-DataImportHandler-for-Oracle-datasource-on-JBoss-tp21305824p21342413.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Plans for 1.3.1?

William Pierce wrote: Thanks, Ryan! It is great that Solr replication (SOLR-561) is included in this release. One thing I want to confirm (if Noble, Shalin et al) can help: I had encountered an issue a while back (in late October I believe) with using SOLR-561. I was getting an error (Alrea

Re: Plans for 1.3.1?

Hi, Mark: Thanks for the updateLooking forward to 1.4! Cheers, - Bill -- From: "Mark Miller" Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:48 PM To: Subject: Re: Plans for 1.3.1? William Pierce wrote: Thanks, Ryan! It is great that Solr replicati

Re: Using Solr with an existing Lucene index

My first attempt to do this resulted in my Java program throwing a CorruptIndex exception. It appears as though Solr has somehow modified my index files in some way which causes the Lucene code to see them as corrupt (even though I did not, at least intentionally, try to post any documents or othe

Re: Clustering Carrot2 + Solr

Hi Jean-Philip, The patch should be standalone in that it creates an area under contrib, but it may not be completely up to date, since there have been some minor tweaks to the ANT builds for contrib since I wrote the clustering stuff. However, it should still work once you get past tha

Amount range and facet fields returns [facet_fields]

Hi, I am curious if this is expected behavior in a typical facet with range query: params={facet=true,facet.query=[price:[* TO 500], price:[500 TO *]],q=*:*,facet.field=price i am getting back not only the: facet_queries={price:[* TO 500]=2,price:[500 TO *]=3} but also: facet_fields={price={150.

Re: Is there any better way to configure db-data-config.xml

why do you have multiple root entities ? On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Manupriya wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using the following schema - > > http://www.nabble.com/file/p21332196/table_stuct.gif > > 1. INSTITUTION table is the main table that has information about all the > institutions. > 2. INS

Re: Amount range and facet fields returns [facet_fields]

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Yevgeniy Belman wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious if this is expected behavior in a typical facet with range > query: > params={facet=true,facet.query=[price:[* TO 500], price:[500 TO > *]],q=*:*,facet.field=price > > i am getting back not only the: > facet_queries={pr

Re: Using Lucene index in Solr

Do I have to set the datasource that my index references? My data is stored in a database, I want Solr to look up the data in that database using my existing index. At the moment, I have set the element in my solrconfig to point at my existing index, and checked the schema on my existing index u

Re: Is there any better way to configure db-data-config.xml

Hi Noble, In my case, Institutions can be entered in two different ways. 1. Institutions information is directly present in the INSTITUTION table. (Note - Such institutions ARE NOT present in INSTITUTION_SOURCE_MAP table.). In this case, I have INSTITUTION as the parent entity. And INSTITUTION