Hi,
A while ago I implemented searching emails with Solr for my IMAP server
(www.dovecot.org). Seems to work ok, but now I'm having a bit of trouble
trying to figure out how to implement searching from multiple mailboxes
efficiently. Would be great if someone had suggestions how to do things
bette
Somebody please help clear this doubt. What more could i do with the dismax
handler to remove results that don't have 'word1'', 'word2', 'word3' etc in
a search phrase not within 5 words of one another, to not come up in the
results?
anuvenk wrote:
>
> From the solr wiki, it sounded like if qs
Please submit your preferences for the solr logo.
For full voting details, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LogoContest#Voting
The eligible logos are:
http://people.apache.org/~ryan/solr-logo-options.html
Any and all members of the Solr community are encouraged to reply to
this thread and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394267/apache_solr_c_blue.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394265/apache_solr_b_blue.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394263/apache_solr_a_blue.jpg
b.t.w, 2 logo's are missing:
https://issues.apache.or
I was hoping to try using KStem with Solr 1.3.0, but am having trouble
getting it to compile.
With a fresh Solr 1.3.0 that will build successfully, I unzipped the
KStemSolr.zip within the apache-solr-1.3.0 directory, but when I then
try to build (using Ant 1.7.1 and Sun HotSpot JDK 1.6.0 up
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394366/solr3_maho.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_a_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394266/apa
Thanks Ryan for your answer.
>The only thing that may be weird is that if you id field is named "myid",
your elevate.xml file still refers to "id" as the unique key. Is that what
you are refering to?
yes, my id field is named "myid", but elevate.xml expects its name is "id" .
Please find below
On Nov 23, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Paolo Ruscitti wrote:
Thanks Ryan for your answer.
The only thing that may be weird is that if you id field is named
"myid",
your elevate.xml file still refers to "id" as the unique key. Is
that what
you are refering to?
yes, my id field is named "myid", but
ok! gracias ryguasu por tu respuesta, mira que ahora que recuerdo si hay un
setStart y setRows trataré con eso y espero poder terminar mi proyecto, 1000
gracias =)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pagination-with-Solr-tp13847908p20650529.html
Sent from the Solr - User mail
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394218/solr-solid.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394376/solr_sp.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12393951/sslogo-solr-classic.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12391946/apache_solr_bur
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394267/apache_solr_c_blue.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr_c_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/1239
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394266/apache_solr_b_red.jpg
: I'm having difficultly filtering my documents when a field is either
: blank or set to a specific value. I would have thought this would work
:
: fq=-Type:[* TO *] OR Type:blue
Rule#1 don't try to mix AND/OR syntax with +/- syntax ... it never works
the way you want.
"a OR b" is just synt
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394475/solr2_maho-vote.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr_c_red.jpg
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL
: of myfield as the same result. I wish there was an option to just
: completely reindex all data..i suppose optimize may do that a little
: bit?
"optimize" is just a low level lucene call to purge all deleted docs and
merge all index segments into a single segment.
and there is an option to r
: > Logging an error and returning successfully (without adding any docs) is
: > still inconsistent with the way all other RequestHandlers work: fail the
: > request.
: >
: > I know DIH isn't a typical RequestHandler, but some things (like failing
: > on failure) seem like they should be a given.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Marc Sturlese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have started working with an index divided in 3 shards. When I did a
> distributed search I got an error with the fields that were not string or
> text. I read that the error was due to BinaryResponseWriter and not
> stri
: I was wondering if it is possible to access and modify the charTypeTable
: of the WordDelimeterFilter.
FWIW: WordDelimeterFilter has a static package protected
defaultWordDelimTable but there is no need to modify it -- you can
pass your own charTypeTable directly to the WordDelimeterFilter
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:59:50 -0500
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please submit your preferences for the solr logo.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394267/apache_solr_c_blue.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394263/apache_solr_a_blue.jpg
https:/
: 1) modify web.xml (part of the sources of solr.war, which you'll have to
: rebuild) to define the authentication constraints you want.
for many servlet containers, this isn't neccessary. Jetty cor example
also lets you define security realms in the jetty.xml (there's an example
of this com
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394366/solr3_maho.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12392306/apache_solr_sun.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394267/apache
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394353/solr.s5.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394265/apache_solr_b_blue.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394167/solrlo
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does waitFlush do anything now? I only see it being set if eclipse is not
> missing a reference...
Not currently. The idea was that if waitFlush== false that the call
would be totally asynchronous and return immediately.
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:02:16 +0200
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Timo,
>
[...]
> The main problem is that before doing the search, I first have to check
> if there are any unindexed messages and then add them to Solr. This is
> done using a query like:
> - fl=uid
> - rows
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : > Logging an error and returning successfully (without adding any docs) is
> : > still inconsistent with the way all other RequestHandlers work: fail the
> : > request.
> : >
> : > I know DIH isn't a typical RequestHa
Please help someone...i've been waiting for an answer for the last couple of
days & no one seems to be helping out here. I did search the wiki & this
forum for an answer. But couldn't find an answer. I know if ps is set to 5
words within 5 words of one another receive a boost in score. But is ther
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:51 PM, anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please help someone...i've been waiting for an answer for the last couple of
> days & no one seems to be helping out here. I did search the wiki & this
> forum for an answer. But couldn't find an answer. I know if ps is set to 5
Thanks for the response. Well my current ps setting works great for most
search terms. But say this typical example, north dakota 1031 exchange
lawyers - we don't have any relevant docs in the index. Solr is returning
the irrelevant doc, just because it found 'lawyer', exchange, north & dakota
som
If you boost the phrase queries by enough, you could tell when you hit
the less relevant documents by the score.
-Yonik
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:07 AM, anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response. Well my current ps setting works great for most
> search terms. But say this ty
Hi,
Looking for some insight on distributed search.
Say I have an index distributed in 3 boxes and the index contains time and text
data (typical log file). Each box has index for different timeline - say Box 1
for all Jan to April, Box 2 for May to August and Box 3 for Sep to Dec.
Now if I tr
Hi,
We having 100 category and each category having it own internal ranking.
Let consider if I search for any product and its fall under 30 categories
and we are showing top 10 categories in filter so that user can filter there
results.
Let consider hypothetical example(as we don't have correct d
31 matches
Mail list logo
