On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:28 PM, Jake Conk wrote:
I was wondering what are the differences in certain field types? For
instance what's the difference between the following?
integer / sint
float / sfloat
The difference is the internal representation of the String value of
the term representing t
On Aug 11, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Ian Connor wrote:
I originally used a Ruby Date class for my dates, but found when I set
the type to solr.DateField in the solrconfig.xml, it returned a parse
error. After that, I switched to Time and it worked fine.
However, I now have some dates that are out of th
Hi,
I need to modify the query to search through all fields if no explicit field
has been specified. I know there's the dismax handler but I'd like to use
the standard query syntax.
I implemented that with my own QParserPlugin and QParser and for simple term
queries it works great. I'm using the S
On Aug 11, 2008, at 1:51 PM, swarag wrote:
When I query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=p*
I get results back, but when I query as
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=P*
I get no results. Is there anything wrong im doing?
Wildcard expressions are _not_ analyzed when parsed. Their case i
Solr/Lucene QueryParser returns a TermQuery for "phrases" that end up
only as a single term. This could happen, for example, if it was
using Solr's "string" field type (which has effectively no analyzer).
I'd guess that you'd want to re-analyze TermQuery's? (though that
sound problematic
Hi Tom,
There will be no clean way of doing this with scripts. A way would be to
write a newSearcher event listener in Java and use one of the
SolrIndexSearcher#getDocList methods to do the query. If successful, execute
your scripts for snapshoot.
However, I think it should be fine if you want to
Ah, yes, the FieldType I used was not the one I needed. I completely missed
that. Thank you very much, it's working perfectly now.
thanks,
Stefan Oestreicher
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:46 AM
> To: solr-user@luc
I like your suggestion. To keep the index working the same, I have
just switched to dates and added the string "T23:59:59Z" and it seems
to make the solr.DateField happy when this string is passed.
It will mean I will have to mess with it on the way back in - but it
should be okay. To have solr-ru
hi :)
I'm trying to use SAXON instead of the default XSLT parser. I was pretty sure i
had it running fine on 1.2, but when I repeated the same steps (as per the
wiki) on latest nightly build, i cannot see any sign of it being loaded or use,
although the classpath seems to be pointing to them (see b
I tried to post it myself, got the address wrong, thanks for re-posting.
the problem we have with highlighting outside of the indexer is that the
systems we use that store co-ords are... based on term string (in one
case) and the specific term offset in another. Both of which break
horribly when t
Hello!
I've noticed that the admin center of SVN head seems to report two
open searches recently, though they appear to be the same searcher..
Example:
name:[EMAIL PROTECTED] main
class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher
version:1.0
description:index searcher
stats:
I believe this is intentional.
searchers are now also registered under their unique names also so one
can tell of there is a searcher "leak". "searcher" is also still used
for the main registered searcher so thinks like JMX can look it up.
-Yonik
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Matthew Runo <[
They are both the same searcher. The reason for displaying them twice is to
see the current searcher separately (named "searcher") and any other
searchers that are still open due to any reasons. The name attribute was
specially added so that one can verify that both are indeed the same.
On Tue, Au
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's safe... the adds will block until the commit or optimize has finished.
>
By block, do you mean that the update connection(s) will be held open? Our
optimizes take many minutes to complete. I'm thinking that this cou
Ah, that makes sense. I just wanted to point it out in case it wasn't
intentional since it wasn't apparent from the front end as to why they
were listed twice.
Thanks for taking a moment to reply =)
Matthew Runo
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 702-943-7833
On Aug 12, 2008,
Hi Alejandro,
Solr is Unicode aware. The ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory handles diacritics for
the ISO Latin-1 section of the Unicode character set. UTF (do you mean UTF-8?)
is a (set of) Unicode serialization(s), and once Solr has deserialized it, it
is just Unicode characters (Java's in-memor
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Jason Rennie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It's safe... the adds will block until the commit or optimize has finished.
>>
>
> By block, do you mean that the update connection(s) will be he
Martin,
You may want to follow Mark Miller's effort
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1286 as it develops --
perhaps even help with it. He's developing a Lucene highlighter which
would "run through query terms by using their offsets" making
highlighting large documents much more t
If you've bene using the trunk (and/or nightly builds) and you take
advantage of the MultiCore features in Solr pelase be aware...
As of r685244 (committed a few moments ago) Solr no longer looks for a
"multicore.xml" file. It instead looks for a "solr.xml" file.
solr.xml supports all of t
: > : how I can get count of distinct facet_fields ?
: > :
: > : like numFacetFound in this example:
: >
: > There's currently no way to do that.
: I need to do the same thing. Any pointers on how one would go about
: implementing that? (in Java) Thanks.
The change would be in the SimpleFacets
On 11-Aug-08, at 10:48 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hello :)
I *think* i know the answer, but i'd like to confirm :
Say I have
1old
already indexed and commited (ie, 'live' )
What happens if I issue:
1
1new
will delete happen first, and then the add, or could it be that the
add happens b
Hello,
I would like to announce that on Monday September 8, 2008 at 5:00pm in the
newthinking store (Tucholskystr. 48, Berlin) the second Hadoop Get Together
in Berlin is going to take place. Just like last time there will be slots of
20min each for talks on your Hadoop topic. After each talk
Thanks Erik!
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Erik Hatcher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:28 PM, Jake Conk wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering what are the differences in certain field types? For
>> instance what's the difference between the following?
>>
>> integer / sint
>> float
1) I want to search only within a specific field, for instance
`category`. Is there a way to do this?
2) When searching for multiple results are the following identical
since "*_facet" and "*_facet_mv" have their type's both set to string?
/select?q=tag_facet:%22John+McCain%22+OR+tag_facet:%22Bar
I read on the Solr 1.3 wiki page that there is a code freeze as of today, is
this still accurate? Moreover - does this mean that Solr1.3 will most likely
ship with Lucene 2.4-dev or is there any plan to wait for lucene 2.4 to be
released?
I know scheduling questions are annoying, but I am curi
Switching to solr-user.
Jerry, what type of function are you trying to do that Solr won't do
for you out of the box?
-Yonik
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Jerry Quinn (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys
Chris - thanks for the alert. Can you please clarify the usage of the default
attribute that is documented to be used in the "core" node. Solr-545 has a
note about this being removed and it is not shown in the new example solr.xml
file.
Thanks
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Chri
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:21:50 -0700
Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > will delete happen first, and then the add, or could it be that the
> > add happens before delete, in which case i end up with no more doc
> > id=1 ?
>
> As long as you are sending these requests on the same thread
1. How do people deal with having solr start when system reboots, manage
the log output, etc. Right now I run it manually under a unix 'screen'
command with a wrapper script that takes care of restarts when it
crashes. That means that only my user can connect to it, and it can't
happen when t
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What happens if I issue:
>
> 1
> 1new
>
>
> will delete happen first, and then the add, or could it be that the add
> happens before delete
Doesn't matter... it's an implementation detail. Solr used to buffer
deletes
Is there a performance difference when using fields that are defined
in my schema vs dynamic fields?
: I read on the Solr 1.3 wiki page that there is a code freeze as of
: today, is this still accurate? Moreover - does this mean that Solr1.3
: will most likely ship with Lucene 2.4-dev or is there any plan to wait
: for lucene 2.4 to be released?
People who are interested in following/discuss
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:53:12 -0400
"Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What happens if I issue:
> >
> > 1
> > 1new
> >
> >
> > will delete happen first, and then the add, or could it be that the add
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:44:42 -0400
"Steven A Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Solr is Unicode aware. The ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory handles diacritics
> for the ISO Latin-1 section of the Unicode character set. UTF (do you mean
> UTF-8?) is a (set of) Unicode serialization(s), and once Sol
: Chris - thanks for the alert. Can you please clarify the usage of the
: default attribute that is documented to be used in the "core" node.
: Solr-545 has a note about this being removed and it is not shown in the
: new example solr.xml file.
Any attribute that was in the old example multi
35 matches
Mail list logo
