Hi all,
I'm using the DataImportHandler, and its working great. What I would
like to do is configure the to use a pooled conncation from
our Servlet container (Jetty) instead of having the DataImportHandler
instantiate and hold a new connection for each entity in our
dataimport-config.xml (which
Using pooled connection may be of little use here .Because the same
connection is used throughout the operation that is one connection/per
entity. If I use a pooled connection I still need to get the same
no:of connections. That is why we did not have that configuration
If you really need it you ca
Hi Swarag,
Indeed, we were faced with a problem with what we called Hiearchy synonym
search, I think it is a little different of what you are looking for, but
who know, maybe it could lead you to find a solution for you problem too.
So here was our need:
Let's say we have this hierarchy of words
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
matt connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my site, I have a document, which may have multiple comments.
>
> For each comment, I would like to know several pieces of information, like:
> text, author, and date.
Matt,
please read the documentation abou
I'm having trouble setting up a dismax handler. I'm trying something really
simple, like this:
explicit
0.1
title^1.5 tags^1.0 body^0.5
*,score
When I analyse a query, I get this (example) in the response:
+DisjunctionMaxQuery((title:chair^1.5 | body:chair
hi,
A new version of my Google Summe of Code project "Solr javascript
library" is available at http://solrstuff.org/svn/solrjs/trunk/ . I also
just updated the wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJS. An
online demo with reasonably testdata will be provided soon.
The library now sup
I believe your query is not matching regardless of that dangling empty
() clause. The dismax query parser adds in several SHOULD (meaning
effectively OR'd) clauses and I've seen (and reported even, I believe)
this empty clause appear also with no problem.
The default query operator is not
Hi Sundar.
Well it would be good if you could do some profiling on your Solr app.
I've done it during the indexing process so I could figure out what was
going on in the OutOfMemoryErrors I was getting.
But you won't definitelly need to have as much memory as your whole
index size. I have a 3.5 m
Hello all,
Please have a look at this url :
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=bob+david&facet=true&facet.field=firstname&facet.field=lastname&facet.field=company&facet.mincount=1
I'm searching for David and Bob and I would like their relevant information
such as first name, last name and com
Hi, Daniel
I got the same probem like Sundar. Is that possible to tell me what
profiling tool you are using?
thx a lot.
/David
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Daniel Alheiros
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi Sundar.
>
> Well it would be good if you could do some profiling on your Solr app.
Thanks for the info. I don't really need it, I was just pondering some
options.
I noticed, anecdotally, in my logs that it didn't appear to be doing
database queries concurrently. It just walked the entity list. That
led to the conclusion that if it is doing things serially, it could
reuse a con
Thanks a lot. This is what keeps us going :)
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Jeremy Hinegardner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I don't really need it, I was just pondering some
> options.
>
> I noticed, anecdotally, in my logs that it didn't appear to be doing
> database queri
As far as I know only one machine can write to an index at a time.
More than that and I got corrupted indexes.
Thanks!
Matthew Runo
Software Developer
Zappos.com
702.943.7833
On Jul 28, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Rakesh Godhani wrote:
Hi, we are currently evaluating Solr and have been browsing the
Does setting termVectors to true affect faceting speed on a field? I changed
a field definition from:
to:
And I see a significant performance improvement (~6x faster). MyFacetField
has ~25,000 unique values. Does it make sense that this change caused the
improvement? I made several other cha
No, faceting does not use term vectors.
-Yonik
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:40 PM, wojtekpia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does setting termVectors to true affect faceting speed on a field? I changed
> a field definition from:
>
> termVectors="true"/>
>
> to:
>
>
>
> And I see a significant perfo
A sneaky source of OutOfMemory errors is the permanent generation. If you
add this:
-XX:PermSize=64m -XX:MaxPermSize=96m
You will increase the size of the permanent generation. We found this
helped.
Also note that when you undeploy a war file, the old deployment has
permanent storage that
Thanks for the input, much appreciated.
-Rakesh
On 7/29/08 12:18 PM, "Matthew Runo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I know only one machine can write to an index at a time.
> More than that and I got corrupted indexes.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matthew Runo
> Software Developer
> Zappos.com
> 70
On 28-Jul-08, at 11:16 PM, Britske wrote:
That sounds interesting. Let me explain my situation, which may be a
variant
of what you are proposing. My documents contain more than 10.000
fields, but
these fields are divided like:
1. about 20 general purpose fields, of which more than 1 can b
You could implement a script that woiuld control which master server is
indexing and put them behind something like a NAT.
I use that that control my master redundancy.
2008/7/29 Rakesh Godhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for the input, much appreciated.
> -Rakesh
>
>
>
> On 7/29/08 12:18 PM, "
After Matthew's comment I was thinking about putting them both behind a load
balancer, with the LB directing all traffic to one until it fails and then
kick over to the other one.
In your architectures I'm guessing the masters share the same physical
index, but do the slaves share the same index a
I need to store 100 million documents in our Solr instance and be able to
retrieve them with simple term queries - keyword matches. I'm NOT
implementing a search application where documents are scored and
ranked...they either match the keywords or not. Also, I have an external
ranking system tha
A function query might fit your needs... you could move some or all of
your external ranking system into Solr.
-Yonik
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Jim Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need to store 100 million documents in our Solr instance and be able to
> retrieve them with simple te
I take it I can add my own functions that would take care of calling out to
my external ranking system?
Looking for docs on that...
Jim
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> A function query might fit your needs... you could move some or all of
> your external ranking system into Solr.
>
> -Yonik
>
> On
Calling out will be an order of magnitude (or two) slower compared to
moving the rankings into Solr, but it is doable. See ValueSource
(it's used by FunctionQuery).
-Yonik
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Jim Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I take it I can add my own functions that would t
If figured that it would be - but the rankings are dynamically calculated.
I'd like to limit the number of calculations performed for this very reason.
Still not sure if this approach will be better than naivly filtering docs
after the query has happened.
Reading about ValueSource thanks...
J
You might be able to split the ranking into a common score and
a dynamic score. Return the results nearly the right order, then
do a minimal reordering after. If you plan to move a result by
a maximum of five positions, then you could fetch 15 results to
show 10 results. That is far, far cheaper th
I'm currently looking through the source, but just wanted to verify how
shards work. If a request is made to:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?shards=localhost:8983/solr,localhost:7574/solr
Does the 8983 instance of Solr make an http request to both 7574 AND 8983 to
search? Or does it know tha
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:35 PM, swarag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently looking through the source, but just wanted to verify how
> shards work. If a request is made to:
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?shards=localhost:8983/solr,localhost:7574/solr
>
> Does the 8983 instance of So
Thanks Walter,
My requirements are this:
1. Query the index for entries matching keyword.
2. remove any entries that are below a threshold score from the external
system
I'm looking at building a custom field type similar to ExternalFileField
that can dole out a ValueSource that calls my exter
29 matches
Mail list logo
