thanks Erik,
I'm experiencing some problems here..
solr version: solr-2008-07-07
Out of the box multicores directory: apache-solr-nightly/example/multicore
multcore.xml: shown bellow:
I can easily see the admin page http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/admin/ and
http://localhost:8983/
I'm using solr-1.2.0. I didn't have a no-arg constructor. I just tried with
one and it doesn't fix it. My servlet container is Jetty.
Sebastien
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What version of Solr are you using? Seems to be not quite trunk at least
it's ok guys,,, fixed the problem :) I have 2 different schemas up and running
thanks anyway
ak
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: multicores issue..
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:55:04 +0100
>
>
> thanks Erik,
> I'm e
Thanks a lot..this is, more or less, what i was looking for.
However, is there a way to pre-configure the dismax query parser, with
parameters like qf, pf, boost etc., in solr-config.xml, rather than doing so
at query time. So my actual query would look like - <
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q
If I understand the question correctly, you can provide init params, default
params and invariant params in the appropriate request handler section in
solrconfig.xml.
So you can create a standard request handler with name dismaxL, whose
defType is dismax and set all parameters in defaults section.
What I actually meant was whether or not I could create a configuration for
a dismax query parser and then refer to it in my filter query. I already
have a standard request handler with a "dismax" deftype for my query field.
I wanted to use another dismax parser for the fq param, on the lines of wh
A custom QParserPlugin could be created and implement an
#init(NamedList) which you could parameterize via it's solrconfig.xml
configuration. That would be one way. Another trick, I think,
would be to use request parameter substitution. The javadocs here
might lead you to what you're a
It happened again last night. I cronned a script that ran jstack on
the process every 5 minutes just to see what was going on. Here's a
snippet:
"btpool0-2668" prio=10 tid=0x2aac3a905800 nid=0x76ed waiting for
monitor entry [0x5e584000..0x5e585a10]
java.lang.Thread
I see that a QParser takes local params (those given via {!...} )as well as
request params. It sets the lookup chain as local followed be request
params. AFAIK, the request param lookup chain is set up as -
those given in the url explicitly, then invariants, then defaults gievn in
solrconfig for t
Oops.. this will only help you configure only the defaults common to the
main dismax query as well as the fq dismax query.
For creating two sets of dismax parsers which are named and want to read
params from solrconfig, I think one can extend the dismaxQParser's currently
empty init() method to se
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:11 AM, chris sleeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I actually meant was whether or not I could create a configuration for
> a dismax query parser and then refer to it in my filter query. I already
> have a standard request handler with a "dismax" deftype for my query f
Ive gone from a complex multicore setup back to a single solrconfig
setup and using a doctype field (since the index is pretty small),
however there are a few spots where items are laid out in tabs and
each tab has a count of docs associated, ie:
News (123) | Images (345) | Video (678) | Bl
> com.example.CustomSimilarity cannot be cast to
> org.apache.lucene.search.Similarity
> at org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.readConfig(IndexSchema.java:449)
> ... 28 more
I think you've got a class loader problem.
If you have solr-1.2.0 source code, see the line 499 of IndexSchema.java:
Thanks a ton...this is quite useful.
Regards,
Chris
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:11 AM, chris sleeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > What I actually meant was whether or not I could create a configuration
> for
> > a disma
Thanks Doug,
Would be nice to have stacktrace for btpool0-2051...
I analyzed LUCache several times, of course it has strange
synchronization statements like
public void warm(SolrIndexSearcher searcher, SolrCache old) throws
IOException {
...
LRUCache other = (LRUCache)old;
...
Thanks for the tip but I solved it but using the old way of loading custom
libs into solr: unpack the war file, add the custom library to WEB-INF/lib
and repack it. It definetly is a class loader problem, as the wiki specifies
that the new way of loading custom jars is using a custom class loader t
I included part of it in my last email, but here's the full one:
"btpool0-2051":
at java.util.Vector.size(Unknown Source)
- waiting to lock <0x2aaac0af0ea0> (a java.util.Vector)
at java.util.AbstractList.listIterator(Unknown Source)
at java.util.AbstractList.li
Hi users and developers,
I'm having some problems with the spellchecker component (I think there are
bugs). A few weeks ago Geoff spoke about some of them.
If I restart tomcat without re-issuing spellcheck.build=true then the
spellcheck starts to fail.
Another thing is that if I have 3 c
Try to use Tomcat... I never had SOLR-deadlocks (I believe) on 4-CPU
SLES 10 server; only OutOfMemoryExceptions (possibly due to faceting,
and significant memory fragmentation)
Recent OOM happened because I run MySQL on same server, and I overloaded it...
OpenBitSet & Faceting is main memory
Change it to higher value, for instance, 3. OpenBitSet is created
for larger values and requires a lot of memory...
Jul 17, 2008 11:09:02 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: allocLargeObjectOrArray - Object
size: 3149016, Num elem
The problems you described in the spellchecker are noted in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-622 -- I shall create an issue to
synchronize spellcheck.build so that the index is not corrupted.
As for multiple cores, yes, they should work independently of each other.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008
How much memory Lucene needs? 100Mb for each such query...
Jul 16, 2008 8:38:43 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: allocLargeObjectOrArray - Object
size: 100767936, Num elements: 25191979
at
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$10.createValue(
On 17-Jul-08, at 10:28 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
Change it to higher value, for instance, 3. OpenBitSet is
created for larger values and requires a lot of memory...
Careful--hash sets of that size can be quite slow. It does make sense
to bump up the value to 6000 or so for large
Thanks Mike, I have 25 millions docs indexed, faceted on simple fields
(cardinality: 5 for country field and 1 for host field)
8192Mb, JRockit R27 (Java 6)
Unpredictable OOMs...
I set HashDocSet/max to 30,000, don't see any performance degradation
yet (the same response times for faceted
: Thanks for the tip but I solved it but using the old way of loading custom
: libs into solr: unpack the war file, add the custom library to WEB-INF/lib
: and repack it. It definetly is a class loader problem, as the wiki specifies
: that the new way of loading custom jars is using a custom class
Hey Guys,
I've been putting together a search engine using Solr/Lucene on the backend
and GWT for the UI. I am looking to track clickthroughs on my results to
construct relevance judgements for the dataset I'm using - but I'm not sure
of a good way to go about this.
Obviously how you do this de
Hi Paul,
I actually use google analytics for this, since it is setup to do it.
In fact, you can configure your GA profile to treat your search page as
a search page and track the effectiveness of searches and even some
support for filters!
Check it out.
-J
pdovyda2 wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I've b
I have noticed that SOLR is stuck on Version 1.2, although this is quite
fine because it works well, I see that Lucene is now up at Version 2.3.2
well beyond the version that is supporting SOLR 1.2. Does anybody know
if there is an updated SOLR version working with the new Lucene
foundation, or is
Hi,
1.3-dev (nightly) uses the latest Lucene.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Sunny Bassan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:20:36 AM
> Subject: Updated version of SOLR?
>
Thank you
> btw, this *seems* to only work for me with standard search handler. dismax
and fq: dont' seem to get along nicely...
Wouldnt the dismax parser consider the filter query parameter as "type idea"
and not value "idea" for solr field - "type"?
I guess thats the reason this query doesnt work with dis
31 matches
Mail list logo