Hi Vijay,
Would index-time boosting work? (maybe not with filters)
If not, how about changing:
q=test&qt=dismax&fq=contemt_source:("ABC" OR "DEF")
to
q=test%20contemt_source:("ABC"^1.0 OR
"DEF"^2.0)&qt=dismax&fq=contemt_source:("ABC" OR "DEF")
I'm not sure without trying, though.
Otis
-
Alok: correct - commit causes Solr to re-open the index.
Gene: That should work just fine. While you can't have multiple concurrent
writers, you can send multiple concurrent indexing requests to a single Solr
instance designated to be the master.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- L
Hi all,
I want to perform field name mapping on solr such that on every query a mapping
file having field name maps (like field1 : field2 ) is read and in query and
response all references to field1 are considered to be on field2. If any such
feature already exists else where can i incorporate
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 03:58:14 Chris Hostetter wrote:
> I'm not much of a highligher expert, but this *seems* like it was probably
> intentional ... you are tlaking abouthte use case where you have a stored
> field, and no term positions correct? ... so in order to highlight, the
> highligh
The problem was, that i used old lucene librarys, which weren't compatible
with the actual trunk.
David Pratt wrote:
>
> Hi kordi. What was the issue and how did you solve it for the benefit of
> the list. Many thanks.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> kordi wrote:
>> I solved it now on myselft sorr
I don't think there is anything built-in that does it, but it doesn't sound
like it would be difficult to do in the app that talks to Solr, for example.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: muddassir hasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Using the StandardRequestHandler, it appears that the index boost values are
> ignored when the query has a wildcard in it. For example, if I have 2
> 's and one has a boost of 1.0 and another has a boost of 10.0, then I
> d
Hi. Merging indexes requires that the indexes be closed for the
operation occur. I am interested in setting up a cron to merge indexes
that are in use to generate a fresh consolidated index at specific time
intervals. I don't want the smaller indexes to be taken out of service
while this occurs
David,
Well, presumably the merging would be done on the master, while the indices on
your search slaves would still happily be serving queries. Thus, you really
just need to coordinate your index merging app and the app that sends documents
to your Solr master for indexing. Since no new docu
Hello everyone.
I've run into a weird problem with Solr's ranking engine. In a nutshell, the
problem involves certain results getting EXTREMELY high rank scores. Here is
an example:
locRvwText:"Pizza Pizza"^10 OR locName:"Pizza Pizza"^30
The way I understand it is that the locName part of th
Sorry about the previous message, I had some formatting issues. Below is the
actual message!
oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I've run into a weird problem with Solr's ranking engine. In a nutshell,
> the problem involves certain results getting EXTREMELY high rank scores.
> Here
I would like to be able to tell SOLR to dedup the results based on a certain
set of fields. For example, I like to return only one instance of the set
of documents that have the same 'name' and 'address'. But I would still
like to keep all instances around in case someone wants to retrieve one
Clay Webster wrote:
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> Reminder: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers lists the sites using
> Solr. The listing is a bit thin. I know many people don't know about the
> list or don't have the time to add themselves to the list. I'd like to be
> able to promote open sour
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:02 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clay Webster wrote:
> > Reminder: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers lists the sites using
> > Solr.
> How would you add to that list anyway? It's immutable.
Create yourself a wiki account, then you should be
Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 Field
Collapsing.
-Sean
Head wrote:
I would like to be able to tell SOLR to dedup the results based on a certain
set of fields. For example, I like to return only one instance of the set
of documents that have the same 'name' and
is this going to go into the 1.3 tree at some point?
On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Sean Timm wrote:
Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 Field
Collapsing.
-Sean
Head wrote:
I would like to be able to tell SOLR to dedup the results based on
a certain
set of fields.
I was going to ask the same thing, I'd support this in 1.3.
Thanks!
Matthew Runo
Software Developer
Zappos.com
702.943.7833
On Feb 27, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Alok Dhir wrote:
is this going to go into the 1.3 tree at some point?
On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Sean Timm wrote:
Take a look at https:
Thank you everyone for responses. I guess all was due to may little knowledge
about schema.xml.
If you create new elements you need to change copy mechanism so that default
search can work or you should change your query to include new element.
Thanks again.
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : Once I post
Hi Otis. Many thanks for your reply. My inclination is to create
separate slave and to merge from it. I was thinking to give it a
different cron cycle (than any other slave) for applying snapshots. So
I'd try and determine a reasonable amount of time for a merge and then
resuming snapinstaller.
Thanks Sean!
Sean Timm wrote:
>
> Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 Field
> Collapsing.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Dedup-results-on-the-fly--tp15721708p15726106.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
Our current setup is a master and slave pair on a single machine,
with an index size of ~50GB.
Query and update times are still respectable, but commits are taking
~20% of time on the master, while our daily index optimise can up to
4 hours...
Here's the most relevant part of solr
Hi there,
The documents I am trying to index with Solr contain characters from the CJK
Extension B, which had been added to Unicode in version 3.1 (March 2001).
Unfortunately, it seems to be the case that Solr (and maybe Lucene) do not
yet support these characters.
Solr seems to accept the docume
Hi...All...
I'm having a problem in my current project.There i need to create two
schema file.After that i need to keep them in two diffrent solr directories
..(Like solr_dev and solr_prod).But request doesn't direct to the relevant
folder...Can some one please tel me how to do this...
Thankx
--
Hi all,
Just want to confirm that when dismax request handler is used,
fields in "q" is not supported? I'm asking because this query
gives one result:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=id%3A2023706&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on
while this gives 0, the only difference being the qt argume
On 28/02/2008, at 00:23, Christian Wittern wrote:
The documents I am trying to index with Solr contain characters from
the CJK
Extension B, which had been added to Unicode in version 3.1 (March
2001).
Just to give more information, does java suport this? I beleive they
don't support cha
This is an old problem that has been reported before.
After solr running for a while, /solr/admin becomes
unavailable while search still works. I'm using embedded
jetty. This is solr 1.2. Any chance this has been fixed
in the development branch?
q is supported by both request handlers, but dismax does not support
the same query syntax. Check the Solr wiki for details on the syntax
for each request handler. Specifically in your example, field
selection is not available (in that way) with dismax - field
searching is done different
Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On 28/02/2008, at 00:23, Christian Wittern wrote:
The documents I am trying to index with Solr contain characters from
the CJK
Extension B, which had been added to Unicode in version 3.1 (March
2001).
Just to give more information, does java suport this? I beleive
28 matches
Mail list logo
