Re: Cannot start SVN head Solr 1.3

2007-12-28 Thread Matthew Runo
Hmm, so that fixed the first error. but I still get... INFO: AutoCommit: if uncommited for 6ms; Dec 28, 2007 8:55:29 AM org.apache.solr.handler.SearchHandler inform INFO: Adding component:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dec 28, 2007 8:55:29 AM org.apache.solr.handler.SearchHandler inform INFO: Adding

Re: Cannot start SVN head Solr 1.3

2007-12-28 Thread Ryan McKinley
check your solrconfig for anything dealing with components -- the example app in /trunk definitely works. It looks like it is asking for a search component with no name? Unknown Search Component: What config is doing this? Maybe it could throw a nicer error if it is missing something somewh

Unique field and EmbeddedSolr issue..

2007-12-28 Thread cricdigs
Hi, I have 2 questions: 1. I am using EmbeddedSolr and using example from here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/EmbeddedSolr I just noticed that there is a note there saying that the page is out of date, is that true and if yes is there an example that uses Solrj? 2. I am using EmbeddedSolr and I

sizing/sanity check for huge(?) dataset

2007-12-28 Thread Alok Dhir
Hey all -- first, thanks to the solr & lucene teams for fantastic products. So far we're very pleased with the results we're seeing from them. We're looking at it as the primary search solution for a rather large dataset. Hoping for a comments/sanity check from people who "know". Looki

Re: sizing/sanity check for huge(?) dataset

2007-12-28 Thread Alok Dhir
Missed one bit of data: This dataset will be searched less than 500 times per day. The goal is to get results in a reasonable amount of time (<3s), but the queries coming in per minute will likely max out around 10. On Dec 28, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Alok Dhir wrote: Hey all -- first, thanks t

Re: SOLR 1.2 - Duplicate Documents??

2007-12-28 Thread cricdigs
I am having the same issue. . Here is my schema.xml entries: id I am using EmbeddedSolr instructions from the current wiki page and setting the following for my AddUpdateCommand: AddUpdateCommand addcmd = new AddUpdateCommand(); addcmd.allowDups = false; addcmd.overwritePen

Re: Custom Similarity

2007-12-28 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Dec 28, 2007 4:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a custom Similarity class that I would like to load. It has a > no-arg constructor, so it should work fine within Solr's context. > However, it has the option for other constructor input values as well > that I would like

Custom Similarity

2007-12-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I have a custom Similarity class that I would like to load. It has a no-arg constructor, so it should work fine within Solr's context. However, it has the option for other constructor input values as well that I would like to be able to set. Is there a way to set these values in Solr via

Re: Custom Similarity

2007-12-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 28, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Dec 28, 2007 4:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a custom Similarity class that I would like to load. It has a no-arg constructor, so it should work fine within Solr's context. However, it has the option for other cons

Solr and WebSphere 6.1

2007-12-28 Thread George Aroush
Hi folks, Has anyone managed to get Solr 1.2 to run under WebSphere 6.1? If so, can you share your experience, what configuration, settings, etc. you had to do. Someone asked this questions earlier this month, but I don't see anyone followed up -- so I'm asking again since I have this need too.

Re: sizing/sanity check for huge(?) dataset

2007-12-28 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Hi Al, 165GB of disk space and 100M is big, but not impossibly huge. The only thing that looks a bit worrisome is the index size : RAM ratio. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Alok Dhir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.

Re: sizing/sanity check for huge(?) dataset

2007-12-28 Thread Alok K. Dhir
I wondered about that myself. What is the rule of thumb there -- would 16gb be comfortable? Thanks for the response. Al On Dec 28, 2007, at 8:30 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Hi Al, 165GB of disk space and 100M is big, but not impossibly huge. The only thing that looks a bit worrisome is t

RE: sizing/sanity check for huge(?) dataset

2007-12-28 Thread Lance Norskog
We have maybe 1.2k per record and a large index works fine. You want more RAM and more to the point fast disk I/O for reading. Striped/mirrored the more the better. Giant indexes fall down on sorting. Any sort creates an array with one integer for each record in the index for the field, that's 40