Hi All,
I want to perform a search for documents that contain the word starting with
given KEYWORD or Ending with given KEYWORD.
Ex: Say document contains "RenjiMathewThomas"
Now I want to perform a search for all the documents that contain the word
starting with "Renji"
or a search that for d
Hi All,
I want to perform a search for documents that contain the word Ending with
given KEYWORD.
Ex: Say document contains "RenjiMathewThomas"
Now I want to perform a search for all the documents that contain the word
starting with "Renji"
Lucene does not allow searches starting with wil
Hello Hoss,
I appreciate your detailed response. I think I like your second
alternative because I'd like to score whole books rather than pages in
books. It seems to me that the more words one has to work with in a
"document" the better the scoring would be for the entire book.
Here's a qu
Writing a utility in java to do a copy from one solr index to another.
I query for the documents I want to copy:
SolrQuery q = new SolrQuery();
q.setQuery("dogs");
QueryResponse rq = source_solrserver.query(q);
for( SolrDocument d : rq.getResults() ) {
// now I want to add these to a new
try:
public static SolrInputDocument toSolrInputDocument( SolrDocument d )
{
SolrInputDocument doc = new SolrInputDocument();
for( String name : d.getFieldNames() ) {
doc.addField( name, d.getFieldValue(name), 1.0f );
}
return doc;
}
perhaps we should add this to Clie
No one has a suggestion? I must be missing something because as I
understand it from Dennis' email, all of queries are very quick
(cached type response times) whereas mine are not. I can clearly see
time differences between queries that are cached (things that have
been auto warmed) and que
On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
public static SolrInputDocument toSolrInputDocument( SolrDocument
d )
{
SolrInputDocument doc = new SolrInputDocument();
for( String name : d.getFieldNames() ) {
doc.addField( name, d.getFieldValue(name), 1.0f );
}
retur
One possible explanation is that the OS's native file system caching is
being successful at keeping these files mostly in RAM most of the time.
And so the performance benefits of 'forcing' the files into RAM by
using tmpfs aren't significant.
So the slowness of the queries is the result of be
Brian Whitman wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
public static SolrInputDocument toSolrInputDocument( SolrDocument d )
{
SolrInputDocument doc = new SolrInputDocument();
for( String name : d.getFieldNames() ) {
doc.addField( name, d.getFieldValue(name), 1.0
There are query and document field caches. A query cache is a list of
records that match a query. A document cache actually contains the
fields. Fetching from your query cache still has to assemble the results
from the indexed data. If the ram-based index is paging, that is an
answerr.
Note that
On 4-Dec-07, at 11:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions are helpful to me,. even general.. Here is the info
from my index:
How big is the index on disk (the most important files are .frq,
and .prx if you do phrase queries?
- Total index folder size is 30.7 Gb
- .frq is 12.2 Gb
- .pr
Scoring isn't that simple, but don't ask me details .. This link might
be useful:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/scoring.html
Erick
On Dec 6, 2007 2:15 PM, Phillip Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Hoss,
>
> I appreciate your detailed response. I think I like your second
> alternat
On Dec 7, 2007 10:17 AM, Laxmilal Menaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have created a simple java application which indexes database tables,
> now
> I want to configure the solr on my created index. My index has 5 fields,
> FriendID, Title, Address, PhoneNo and Comments.
>
W
Hello everyone,
I have created a simple java application which indexes database tables, now
I want to configure the solr on my created index. My index has 5 fields,
FriendID, Title, Address, PhoneNo and Comments.
I have updated solr config.xml according to my fields with the followings:
FriendID
I don't want to use solr for indexing database, I want to use solr for
searching on existing index created by me with using my sample application.
LM
On 12/7/07, Venkatraman S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2007 10:17 AM, Laxmilal Menaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
solr should be able to read any lucene index -- even if it did not
create it. The hitch is that you need to make sure the analyzers and
fieldTypes match what is in your index otherwise it is unlikely for the
result to be what you expect.
To get solr to use your manually created index files, j
thanks for fast reply, I have dump my index in solr data folder and able to
search in single field only, but want to search in all fields. also how can
I configure StandradAnalyzer in solr config xml.
LM
On 12/7/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> solr should be able to read any luce
Ok, thanks.. have tried it, It working.
But if I use it and may be XXX or YYY value is too long, I think many server
dont support long urls so it may give us problem. So is there any
configuration in config file for future.
LM
On 12/7/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You should b
You should be able to search any field:
?q=field1:XXX field2:YYY
You can register fieldTypes directory to an analyzer using:
positionIncrementGap="100">
class="org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer"/>
ryan
Laxmilal Menaria wrote:
thanks for fast reply, I have du
You can also use the dismaxrequesthandler to search across multiple field
-Message d'origine-
De : Laxmilal Menaria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 7 décembre 2007 08:25
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: How do I search in all fields without index by solr
Ok, tha
20 matches
Mail list logo
