Hi Hoss.
Well I'll enable this ignore options for fields that aren't declared in my
schema. Thanks.
Exactly, you can try it really easily, just remove one of your fields on the
example schema config and try to add content using the Java client API...
Well I'm using SOLRJ and it returns no error c
Norskog, Lance wrote:
Hi-
What is the element in an element that will load
this class:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.ChineseFilter
This did not work:
This is in Solr 1.2.
the class needs to point to a FilterFactory (not a Filter)
1.3-dev adds FilterFactories for all the lucne
To be clear: solr *should* fail with an error if you send an unknown
field.
I just tested this with a clean checkout of 1.3-dev and 1.2 and in both
cases I get an error 400 "unknown field 'asgasdgasgd'"
The suggestion to look at the "ignore option" is to make sure you don't
have one -- this
It seems the best thing to do would be to do a case-insensitive
spellcheck, but provide the suggestion preserving the original case that
the user provided--or at least make this an option. Users are often
lazy about capitalization, especially with search where they've learned
from web search e
Hello,.. If index size is 100Gb and I want to run optimize command, how much
more space I need for this?
Also,.. If I run snapshooter does it take more space during shooting than
actual snapshoot?
\Thank you
Gene
With a fieldtype of string, can I do any sort of *thing* search? I
can do thing* but not *thing or *thing*. Workarounds?
Store a copy with the string reversed in another field. Then you can
search that field for gniht* ...
Also, I believe I saw some comments about prefix wildcards being
available in some upcoming release (1.3?) ... sorry I can't remember
any better than that. Google may help ...
-Charlie
On Nov 29
Hi,
I have 22 documents. I index these by posting them using LWP::UserAgent
all with http status 200 OK.
One of my documents (id=44) contains the word "Campeau" in the "ocr"
field. But according to luke this term does not appear in the index.
Yet when I delete the index (delete by query *:
Hello,
I recently set up Solr with distribution on a couple of servers. I
just learned that our network policies do not permit us to use SSH
with passphraseless keys, and the snappuller script uses SSH to
examine the master Solr instance's state before it pulls the newest
index via rsync.
On Nov 29, 2007 7:29 PM, Phillip Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my documents (id=44) contains the word "Campeau" in the "ocr"
> field. But according to luke this term does not appear in the index.
AFAIK the Luke handler lists the top terms, not necessarily all of them.
Do a search for
see yonik's comments regarding Luke and wether or not your term is
indexedx, as for this point
: Also I notice that the numTerms for 22 documents is 5579 and for just the doc
: id=44 it's 2194. Hard to believe that 22 documents only increase the number
: of terms by so little.
this is not
: think i'm just doing something wrong...
:
: was experimenting with the spellcheck handler with the nightly
: checkout from 11-28; seems my spellchecking is case-sensitive, even
: tho i think i'm adding the LowerCaseFilterFactory to both the index
: and query analyzers.
I'm not very familiar wi
Kasi Sankaralingam wrote:
When we have the following set of data, they are first sorted based on Capital
letters and then lower case
. Is there a way to make them sort regardless of character case?
Avaneesh
Bruce
Veda
caroleY
jonathan
junit
So carole would come after Bruce. Thanks
sorting i
Your company's network policies seem to be a good thing. I've worked
at places with this same policy, for good reason. But it does tend to
complicate operations sometimes. Some options you might pursue:
* Set up ssh-agent on the clients and use passphrase-protected keys.
Downside to this, s
When we have the following set of data, they are first sorted based on Capital
letters and then lower case
. Is there a way to make them sort regardless of character case?
Avaneesh
Bruce
Veda
caroleY
jonathan
junit
So carole would come after Bruce. Thanks
On 29-Nov-07, at 5:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
I'm not very familiar with the SpellCheckerRequestHandler, but i don't
think you are doing anything wrong.
a quick skim of the code indicates that the "q" param isn't being
analyzed
by that handler, so the raw input string is pased to the
Spe
: Exactly, you can try it really easily, just remove one of your fields on the
: example schema config and try to add content using the Java client API...
: Well I'm using SOLRJ and it returns no error code for me. But anyway don't
: you think the server should also have some logging informing tha
17 matches
Mail list logo