Hi, i want to index an excel file and i have the following error:
http://dev.torrez.us/public/2006/pundit/java/src/plugin/parse-msexcel/sample/test.xls:
failed(2,0): Can't be handled as Microsoft document.
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: No cell at position col1, row 0.
I already add m
You can use curl (www.php.net/curl) to interface with solr, its a piece of cake!
-Nick
On 11/20/07, SDIS M. Beauchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the php and php serialized writer to query Solr from php
>
> It's very easy to use
>
> But it's not so easy to update solr from php ( that's why
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:55:04 +0530
"Eswar K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any difference in the way any of the Solr's features work on
> Windows/Linux.
Hi Eswar,
I am developing on FreeBSD 6.2 and 7, testing on a VM with Windows 2003 Server,
and deploying for now, on Win32 too. We wil
Eswar,
This link would give you a fair idea of how Solr is used by some of the
sites/companies -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceData
Rishabh
On Nov 20, 2007 10:49 AM, Eswar K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In our case, the load is kind of distributed. On an average, the QPS could
> be
-Orijinal e-posta iletisi-
From: Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:16:53 +0200
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Invalid value 'explicit' for echoParams parameter
> AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
> > I am a newbie at solr. I have done everything in the solr tutoria
The URL is
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=solr&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on
When i added &echoParams=explicit to the query nothing has changed. But when I
find and replaced the word 'explicit' to uppercase 'EXPLICIT' in the solrconfig.xml
it worked. The problem has solved. Thank
I recently fixed this in the trunk.
-Yonik
On Nov 20, 2007 10:31 AM, Rishabh Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using Solr 1.2 for our project and have come across the following
> exception and error:
>
> Exception:
> SEVERE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> at org.
: I'm confident that /trunk accepts any case:
:
: v = v.toUpperCase();
thats in Solr 1.2 as well hmmm
Ahmet: what is the default Locale of your JVM?
String.toUpper() does use the default Locale ... i guess maybe we should
start being more strict about using "compareToIgnoreCase"
Hi All!
I just started reading about Solr a couple of days ago (not full time
of course) and it looks like a pretty impressive set of
technologies... I have still a few questions I have not clearly found:
Q: On a cluster, as I understand it, one and only one machine is a
master, and N ser
: What I'm trying is to parse the response for "numFound:"
: and if this number is greater than the "rows" parameter, I send another
: search request to Solr with a new "start" parameter. Is there a better
: way to do this? Specifically, is there another way to obtain the
: "numFound" rather
Hi,
We are using Solr 1.2 for our project and have come across the following
exception and error:
Exception:
SEVERE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at org.apache.lucene.util.PriorityQueue.initialize (PriorityQueue.java
:36)
Steps to reproduce:
1. Restart your Web Server.
2. Ente
Hi
I've got a problem with solrj from nightly build (from 2007-11-12).
I have this code:
solrClient = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(new URL(indexServerUrl));
and after "add" operation firing solrClient.commit(true, true); But commit
operation is not processing in Solr as I can see in log files
Can you recommend one? I am not familar with how to profile under Java.
Yonik Seeley schrieb:
Can you try a profiler to see where the memory is being used?
-Yonik
On Nov 20, 2007 11:16 AM, Brian Carmalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
I started looking into the scalability of solr, a
Can you try a profiler to see where the memory is being used?
-Yonik
On Nov 20, 2007 11:16 AM, Brian Carmalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I started looking into the scalability of solr, and have started getting
> weird results.
> I am getting the following error:
>
> Exception in t
Hello all,
I started looking into the scalability of solr, and have started getting
weird results.
I am getting the following error:
Exception in thread "btpool0-3" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to
create new native thread
at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method)
at java
I'm using the Eclipse TPTP platfrom and I'm very happy with it. You will
also find good howto or tutorial pages on the web.
- simon
On Nov 20, 2007 5:29 PM, Brian Carmalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you recommend one? I am not familar with how to profile under Java.
>
> Yonik Seeley schrieb
On Nov 20, 2007 11:29 AM, Brian Carmalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you recommend one? I am not familar with how to profile under Java.
Netbeans has one for free:
http://www.netbeans.org/products/profiler/
-Yonik
Hello all,
I am writing my own handler, and I would like to pre-filter the results based
on a field. I’m calling searcher.getDocList() with a custom constructed query
and filters list, but the filters always seem to AND together. My question is
this: how can I construct the List of filters to m
I am trying to run a very simple query via the Admin interface and
receive the exception below.
The query is:
description_t:guard AND title_t:help
I am using dynamic fields (hence the underscored suffix).
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
/cody
Nov 19, 2007 3:01:31 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrE
: I apologize for cross-posting but I believe both Solr and Lucene users and
: developers should be concerned with this. I am not aware of a better way to
: reach both communities.
some of these questions strike me as being largely unrelated. if
anyone wishes to followup on them further, let'
Yes. The clients will always be a minute or two behind the master.
I like the way some people are doing it - make them all masters! Just
post your updates to each of them - you loose a bit of performance
perhaps, but it doesn't matter if a server bombs out or you have to
upgrade them, since
On 20-Nov-07, at 8:16 AM, Brian Carmalt wrote:
Hello all,
I started looking into the scalability of solr, and have started
getting weird results.
I am getting the following error:
Exception in thread "btpool0-3" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable
to create new native thread
at ja
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCollectionDistributionScripts
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCollectionDistributionStatusStats
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrOperationsTools
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCollectionDistributionOperationsOutl
AppPerfect has a free-for-noncommercial-use version of their tools. I've
used them before and was very impressed.
http://www.appperfect.com/products/devtest.html#versions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Tuesday, Novem
Thanks for the response!
Interesting, this ALL MASTERS mode... I guess you don't do any
replication then...
In the single master, several slaves mode, I'm assuming the client
still writes to one and reads from the others... right?
On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Matthew Runo wrote:
Yes. T
Hi,
Can anyone help me how to facet and/or search for associated fields? -
1234
Baseball hall of Fame opens Jackie Robinson
exhibit
Description about the new JR hall of fame
exhibit.
20071114
200711
0
press
Sports
Baseball
Major League Baseball
Arts and Culture
C
Hi,
I've successfully run as far as the example admin page on Debian linux 2.6.
So I installed the solr-jetty packaged for Debian testing which gives me
Jetty 5.1.14-1 and Solr 1.2.0+ds1-1. Jetty starts fine and so does the
Solr home page at http://localhost:8280/solr
But I get an error wh
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:26:27 -0600
Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting, this ALL MASTERS mode... I guess you don't do any
> replication then...
correct
> In the single master, several slaves mode, I'm assuming the client
> still writes to one and reads from the others.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:39:58 -0500
"Jae Joo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Can anyone help me how to facet and/or search for associated fields? -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Fear not the path of truth for the
: As far as I know, I do have a full JDK. I'm on OS X and it should come with
: a full JDK:
: http://developer.apple.com/java/
well, 1) it depends on which version of "OS X" you are running (10.1,
10.2?, 10.3?, 10.4?, 10.5?) but i don't think that's your problem ...
you said you could see th
I'm trying to find the right place to start in this community.
I recently posted a question in the thread on SOLR-236. In that
posting I mentioned that I was hoping to persuade my management to
move from a FAST installation to a SOLR-based one. The changeover was
approved in principle to
Phillip,
I won't go into details, but I'll point out that the Java compiler is called
javac and if memory serves me well, it is defined in one of Jetty's XML config
files in its etc/ dir. The java compiler is used to compile JSPs that Solr
uses for the admin UI. So, make sure you have javac a
Mike is right about the occasional slow-down, which appears as a pause and is
due to large Lucene index segment merging. This should go away with newer
versions of Lucene where this is happening in the background.
That said, we just indexed about 20MM documents on a single 8-core machine with
Hi otis,
I understand that is slightly off track question, but I am just curious to
know the performance of Search on a 20 GB index file. What has been your
observation?
Regards,
Eswar
On Nov 21, 2007 12:33 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike is right about the occasional slo
To whomever started this thread: look at Nutch. I believe something related to
this already exists in Nutch for near-duplicate detection.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apach
Solr runs equally well on both 64-bit and 32-bit systems.
Your 15 second problem could be caused by IO bottleneck (not likely if your
index is small and fits in RAM), could be concurrency (esp. if you are using
compound index format), could be something else on production killing your CPU,
coul
Thats great.
At what size of the index do you think we should look at partitioning the
index file?
Eswar
On Nov 21, 2007 12:57 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Just tried a search for "web" on this index - 1.1 seconds. This matches
> about 1MM of about 20MM docs. Redo the sea
Just tried a search for "web" on this index - 1.1 seconds. This matches about
1MM of about 20MM docs. Redo the search, and it's 1 ms (cached). This is
without any load nor serious benchmarking, clearly.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Messag
Most of Sematext's customers seem to be RH fans. I've seen some Ubuntu, some
Debian, and some SuSe users. RH feels "safe". :) Some use Solaris. Some are
going crazy with Xen, putting everything in VMs.
RAM - as much as you can afford, as usual.
CPU - AMD Opterons performed the best last time
Otis,
Thanks for your response.
I just gave a quick look to the Nutch Forum and find that there is an
implementation to obtain de-duplicate documents/pages but none for Near
Duplicates documents. Can you guide me a little further as to where exactly
under Nutch I should be concentrating, regardin
Uh, avoid NFS and Lucene/Solr, unless you really really don't care about
performance. We recently benchmarked Lucene indexing+searching+... on 1) local
disk, 2) SAN, and 3) NFS.
You have the right to a single guess - which of the three was the
slweet?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://se
41 matches
Mail list logo
