Hi Patrick,
On 9/27/07, patrick o'leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> p.s after a little tidy up I'll be adding this to both lucene and solr's
> repositories if folks feel that it's a useful addition.
It's definitely very interesting. Did you compare performances of
Lucene with a database allowi
While in theory -URL:"" should be valid syntax, the Lucene query parser
doesn't accept it and throws a ParseException. I've considered raising this
issue on lucene-dev but it didn't seem to affect many users so I decided not
to pursue the matter.
On 27/09/2007, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED
As far as I'm concerned nothings going to beat PG's GIS calculations,
but it's tsearch was
a lot slower than myisam.
My goal was a single solution to reduce our complexity, but am
interested to know if combining
both an rdbms & lucene works for you. Definitely let me know how it
goes !
P
Gu
thanks Peter, Hoss and Ryan..
q=(URL:[* TO *] -URL:"")
This gives me 400 Query parsing error: Cannot parse '(URL:[* TO *] -
URL:"")': Lexical error at line 1, column 29. Encountered: "\"" (34),
after : "\""
adding something like:
I'll do this but the problem here is I have to wait
will anyone help me why and how?
org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock obtain timed out:
SimpleFSLock@/usr/local/se
archengine/apache-solr-1.2.0/fr_companies/solr/data/index/write.lock
at org.apache.lucene.store.Lock.obtain(Lock.java:70)
at org.apache.lucene.inde
quick fix
look for a lucene lock file in your tmp directory and delete it, then
restart solr, should start
I am an idiot though, so be careful, in fact, I'm worse than an
idiot, I know a little
:-)
you got a lock file somewhere though, deleting that will help you
out, for me it was in
On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:28 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
cool => (popularity:[100 TO *] (+numFeatures:[10 TO *] +price:[0
TO 10]))
lame => (+popularity:[* TO 99] +numFeatures:[* TO 9] +price:[11
TO *])
That example is definitely in the cool category. I couldn't resist
creating a SolrTerm
On 9/27/07, Pieter Berkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While in theory -URL:"" should be valid syntax, the Lucene query parser
> doesn't accept it and throws a ParseException.
I don't have time to work on that now, but I did just open a bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1006
-Yoni
I am trying to make a presentation on SOLR and have been unable to find
the SOLR graphic in high quality. Could someone point me in the right
direction or provide the graphics?
Thanks,
Benjamin Liles
Lead Software Application Developer
Digital Initiatives - Web Services
University Libraries
Hi,
I do need to move the index files, but have a concerns any potential problem
including performance?
Do I have to keep the original document for querying?
Thanks,
Jae Joo
On 9/27/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do need to move the index files, but have a concerns any potential problem
> including performance?
> Do I have to keep the original document for querying?
I assume you posted XML documents in Solr XML format (like ...)?
If so, that is just an exa
Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : is there an analyzer which automatically converts all german special
> : characters to their specific dissected from, such as ü to ue and ä to
> : ae, etc.?!
>
> See also the ISOLatin1TokenFilter which does this regardless of langauge.
Actually, ISOLatin1TokenFilter doe
Hi,
I'm using EmbeddedSolrServer and when I start the snapinstaller process i'm
calling the commit method of the EmbeddedSolr througth a servlet but the JVM
holds deleted files on Operating System and usage disk space excessive.
Follow line sample from the command "lsof |grep deleted"
java 1
In solrconfig.xml,
false
10
25000
1400
500
1000
1
Does writeLockTimeout too small?
Thanks,
Jae
On 9/27/07, matt davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> quick fix
>
> look for a lucene lock file in your tmp directory and delete it, then
> restart solr, should start
>
On 9/27/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Pieter Berkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While in theory -URL:"" should be valid syntax, the Lucene query parser
> > doesn't accept it and throws a ParseException.
>
> I don't have time to work on that now,
OK, I lied :-) It wa
At 12:13 PM -0400 9/27/07, Steven Rowe wrote:
>Chris Hostetter wrote:
>> : is there an analyzer which automatically converts all german special
>> : characters to their specific dissected from, such as ü to ue and ä to
>> : ae, etc.?!
>>
>> See also the ISOLatin1TokenFilter which does this regardle
Accent transforms are language-specific, so an accent filter
should take an ISO langauge code as an argument.
Some examples:
* In French and English, a diereses is a hint to pronounce neighboring
vowels separateley, as in coöp, naïve, or Noël.
* In German, ü transformes to ue.
* In Swedish, ö i
Hi all,
I'm now using date facetting to browse events. It works really fine
and is really useful. The only problem so far is that if I have an
event which is exactly on the boundary of two ranges, it is referenced
2 times.
If we admit that we have a gap of 6 hours starting from 2007-09-27
12:00,
: > Previously we were using lucene to do this. by using the
: > SortComparatorSource we could sort the documents returned by distance
: > nicely. we are now switching over to lucene because of the features it
: > provides, however i am not able to see a way to do this in Solr.
Someone started a
In "normal" solr usage, where Solr is the only thing writing to your
index, you should never get a lock timeout ... typical reasosn for this to
happen are if your servlet container crashed or was shutdown uncleanly and
Solr wasn't able to clean up it's lock file (check your logs)
There is an
: I'm now using date facetting to browse events. It works really fine
: and is really useful. The only problem so far is that if I have an
: event which is exactly on the boundary of two ranges, it is referenced
: 2 times.
yeah, this is one of the big caveats with date faceting right now ... i
st
On Sep 27, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
to answer the broader question of using customized
LUcene SortComparatorSource objects in solr -- it is in fact possible.
In Solr, all decisisons about how to sort are driven by
FieldTypes. You
can subclass any of the FieldTypes that come w
Hi there.
Is there a query I can use to select distinct values in an index?
I thought I could use a facet, but the facets don't seem to return
all the distinct values in the index, only the highest-count ones.
Is there another query I can try? Or, can I adjust the facets
somehow to make this wor
On 9/27/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using something like this, how would the custom SortComparatorSource
> get a parameter from the request to use in sorting calculations?
perhaps hook in via function query:
dist(10.4,20.2,geoloc)
And either manipulate the score with that and
On 9/27/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a better option (assuming a query parser change) would be a new option
> thta says wether each computed range should be enclusive of the low poin,t
> the high point, both end points, neither end points, or be "smart" (where
> smart is the sam
On 27-Sep-07, at 12:01 PM, David Whalen wrote:
Hi there.
Is there a query I can use to select distinct values in an index?
I thought I could use a facet, but the facets don't seem to return
all the distinct values in the index, only the highest-count ones.
Is there another query I can try? Or
On 9/27/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The simple workarround: if you know all of your data is indexed with
> perfect 0.000second precision, then put "-1MILLI" at the end of your start
> and end date faceting params.
It fixed my problem. Thanks.
--
Guillaume
Thank you Ezra and Chris for explaining this,
and I like your idea, Erik. This will make intro to Solr
easier for new comers, and make Solr more popular.
-Kuro
> That example is definitely in the cool category. I couldn't resist
> creating a SolrTerminology wiki page linking to your post a
Silly me. Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:46 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Selecting Distinct values?
>
> On 27-Sep-07, at 12:01 PM, David Whalen wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> >
Hi,
What is the difference between the
1000, and the
1000... parameters in
solrconfig.xml?
Do they influence the frequency of flush to disk and document
distribution in segments in a different way?
When I did some test with low identical values, I saw similar behavior
in terms of frequ
On 27-Sep-07, at 3:35 PM, Bouis, Laurent wrote:
What is the difference between the
1000, and the
1000... parameters in
solrconfig.xml?
Do they influence the frequency of flush to disk and document
distribution in segments in a different way?
maxBufferedDocs affects disk flushing behaviour, bu
Hi,
I have a user index(each user has a unique index record) and need to get
information for 10 users. Should I run 10 queries or 1 query with
multiple user ids? Any performance difference?
Thanks
Xuesong
If you're using Jetty 6, there's no need for a separate "Jetty Plus"
download. The "plus" jarfiles come in the standard distribution.
--matt
On Sep 27, 2007, at 12:10 AM, James liu wrote:
i can't download it from http://jetty.mortbay.org/jetty5/plus/
index.html
--
regards
jl
--
Matt Kang
33 matches
Mail list logo
