Hi There,
I'm new to solr, and so far I've been impressed. One thing I'm curious
about, as a newbie, is the source of some of the log messages that
show up in the example solr+jetty setup, found in the 1.2
distribution's example directory.
I'm seeing two kinds of log messages. First there are one
i wanna do it.
Maybe someone did it, if so, give me some tips.
thks
--
regards
jl
Okay, I figured it out. The method invocation messages are being
generated by the java logging api. The default logging handler in the
solr+jetty setup is java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler. That handler (or
perhaps java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter, its default formatter)
causes a what-method-am-I-i
Hi all,
I'm currently playing with solr (a nightly build of sep. 16) to see if
it can fit our needs. It's really a great piece of software and I
especially appreciate the facetting features.
I now have something that works really well and there's only one problem left:
- I want to sort the result
: Sometimes there's a field that shouldn't be multiValued, but the data comes in
: with multiple fields of the same name in a single document.
:
: Is there any way to continue processing other documents in a file even if one
: document errors out? It seems like whenever we hit one of these cases,
: Is there a way to filter the log that goes into resin by "bad/fatal" stuff
: separate from the usual request logging? I would like to put the solr errors
: somewhere else so it's more maintainable.
Resin actually has one of the best logging configuration mechanisms i've
seen, the docs from ca
: - I want to sort the results by title: I do it via a sort=title_t asc
parameter
: - when I don't apply any facetting filter, it works well, my results
: are sorted by title. Search URL is:
...
: - the problem is that as soon as I apply a facetting filter via
: qf=facet:value, I can't ge
:was wondering if there are any plans of merging this patch into svn.
Hey John: I'm going to leave this message in my inbox as a reminder to
look at the latest patch when i get a chance ... but at this point i'm
having a hard enough time keeping up with geniune bugs, and feature
patche peo
Thanks Chris.
-John
On 9/23/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> :was wondering if there are any plans of merging this patch into svn.
>
> Hey John: I'm going to leave this message in my inbox as a reminder to
> look at the latest patch when i get a chance ... but at this poin