I am trying my best to figure out the correct way to do this
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=12456399&framed=y
I just came across the collapseFilter ( solr 236). I think i will give that
a try.
Thanks hossman for the reply
Bharani
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : My document will hav
Hi,
I have a query, when u try for bulk updates, using autoCommit option (which
does commit on regular basis).
Suppose if another request tries to update before the record is committed by
the first request,
a) Dont u think these requests step on each other and corrupt the index
files?
b) Is ther
Before a COMMIT is done , lock is obtained and its released after the
operation - hence no corruption happens.
On 9/18/07, Dilip.TS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a query, when u try for bulk updates, using autoCommit option
> (which
> does commit on regular basis).
>
> Suppose if
On Sep 18, 2007, at 2:45 AM, Dilip.TS wrote:
Is it possible to "Search items with in the search results" using
SOLR. If
so how?
Simply " AND " the previous query to the new query, or use the
previous query as a filter query (&fq=...) parameter.
Erik
Hi,
I have the following requirement:
When the user searches for the keyword say Java Programming , the user
should be shown the results satisfying the condition Java AND Programming.
But when he types "Java Programming" (i.e within double quotes), the user
should be shown with the results ex
On Sep 18, 2007, at 7:14 AM, Dilip.TS wrote:
Hi,
I have the following requirement:
When the user searches for the keyword say Java Programming , the
user
should be shown the results satisfying the condition Java AND
Programming.
But when he types "Java Programming" (i.e within double q
Hi,
I have the following requirement.
We have an option to sort the search results by relevance. Right now we
are getting the search results making an http call
If the user chooses that option, the results should be sorted based on the
relevance. But the relevance should be calcul
On 9/18/07, Amitha Talasila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 65% of the relevance can be computed while indexing the document and
> posted as a field. But the keyword match is a run time score .Is there any
> way of getting the relevance score as a combination of this 65% and 35%?
A FunctionQuer
Hi,
The first requirement works fine for me, but i was unaware of the Phrase
Queries for the second one.
I found this link very much useful regarding the same.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook
Thanks for the help guys,
Regards
Dilip
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hat
[ Kindly do try before posting in the forum or atleast try to look into the
wiki and other resources ]
nwayz...
For the Former:
use 'AND' and in the default query
For the latter :
use phrase queries - enclosing within double quotes should work.
On 9/18/07, Dilip.TS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
: [Wu, Daniel] That sounds great. Do I need to create a JIRA ticket?
Sure, JIRA is a great way to track feature requests (since they can be
"watched" and "voted" on, and if you want to start on an implementation
you can attach patches...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
-Hoss
Our program has solved some pretty significant search problems using the
Lucene search engine. We're getting ready to take the first step
towards an SOA in our back-where we crank out the data that eventually
becomes searchable via our website. We're looking for a transactional
persistence soluti
: I have a query, when u try for bulk updates, using autoCommit option (which
: does commit on regular basis).
There is alot of complexity going on when dealing with concurrent updates
-- some of it at the Lucene level, some at the Solr level. if you really
want to udnerstand the details, I s
Question: if it is a filter query, it will be cached in the filter query
cache?
Follow-on questions if this is true:
Is this the full results of the filter query?
What exactly is cached?
Thanks,
Lance Norskog
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tues
Hi,
I noticed that the "field list" (fl) parameter ignores field names that
it cannot locate, while the "query fields" (qf) parameter throws an
exception when fields cannot be located. Is there any way to override
this behavior and have qf also ignore fields it cannot find?
This would be pr
I see Yonik recently opened an issue in JIRA to track the addition of
pluggable functions (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-356).
Any chance this will be implemented soon? It would save users like me
from having to hack the Solr source or write custom request handlers
for trivial additio
Hi -
I'm not sure what you mean by a reflection based approach, but I've been
thinking about doing this for a bit, since we needed it, too.
I'd just thought about listing class names in the config file. The functions
would probably need to extend a subclass of ValueSource which will handle
argume
On 9/18/07, Tom Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by a reflection based approach, but I've been
> thinking about doing this for a bit, since we needed it, too.
Reflection could be used to look up and invoke the constructor with
appropriately-typed arguments. If
Hi-
In early June Mike Klass posted a formula for the number of file descriptors
needed by Solr:
For each segment, 7 + num indexed fields per segment.
There should be log_{base mergefactor}(numDocs) * mergeFactor
segments, approximately.
Is this still true?
Thanks,
Lance N
On 9/18/07, Jon Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reflection could be used to look up and invoke the constructor with
> appropriately-typed arguments. If we assume only "primitive" types
> and ValueSources are used, I don't think it would be too hard to craft
> a drop-in replacement that works w
On 18-Sep-07, at 5:39 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
Hi-
In early June Mike Klass posted a formula for the number of file
descriptors
needed by Solr:
For each segment, 7 + num indexed fields per segment.
There should be log_{base mergefactor}(numDocs) * mergeFactor
segments, appro
Hi everyone,
I successfully do the Collection Distribution on two Linux servers - one
master with one slave and sync the index data.
How can I make a search request to master server and receive the
response by all slave servers? OR it should be manually controlled?
Thanks & Best Regard
(NOTE: this discussion probably makes more sense on solr-dev. future
replies should probably go there, or in SOLR-334.)
: The parser is a quick hack I threw together, and any value source
: factories should not be exposed to it. It seems like either
: 1) a value source factory would expose th
There are two federated/distributed search implementations that are still a few
weeks away from maturity:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303Any
help in testing them would definitely be appreciated.
BUT, if you decide to roll your own, take
Helpful information.
So it means that distributed search is not a basic component in Solr project.
Thanks & Best Regards.
Jarvis .
-Original Message-
From: Stu Hood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: How
So it means that distributed search is not a basic component in Solr project.
I think you just need load balancing. Solr is not a load balancer, you
need to find something that works for you and configure that elsewhere.
Solr works fine without persistent connections, so simple round robin
Thanks for your reply,
I need the Federated Search. You mean this is not yet
supported out of the "box". So I have a question that
in this situation what can Collection Distribution used for?
Jarvis
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Septe
27 matches
Mail list logo
