This sounds OK.
I can create a field name mapping structure to change the requests /
responses in a way my client doesn't need to be aware of different fields.
Thanks for this directions,
Daniel
On 8/6/07 21:32, "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : Can't I have the same index, u
Ok. Is it possible to get back the content without the html tags?
On 08/06/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/8/07, Thierry Collogne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to use the solr.HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory analyzer
> with no luck.
[...]
> Is this normal? Should
Hi Henri,
Thanks again, your considerations will sure help on my decision.
Now I'll do my homework to check document volume / growth - expected index
sizes and query load.
Regards,
Daniel Alheiros
On 9/6/07 10:53, "Henrib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
> Trying to recap: you are i
Hi Nick.
I was exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 9/6/07 13:12, "Nick Jenkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Daniel
> You can use a boosting function,
>
> In the dismax request handler insert the following:
>
>
> recip(rord(created),1,1000,1000)
>
>
> Obviously you
On 11-Jun-07, at 3:54 AM, Thierry Collogne wrote:
Ok. Is it possible to get back the content without the html tags?
Well, it isn't stored anywhere in Solr. It's best to think of lucene/
solr as two systems: the indexer applies a tokenization
transformation to the data and creates an inver
: Ok. Is it possible to get back the content without the html tags?
Solr never does anything to modify the "stored" value of a field, so you'd
really need to send Solr the value after strpping the HTML to get this to
work.
Internally, the HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory does the HTML
strippi
I am having a similar(?) problem with 1.2 upgraded from an earlier
incubator release. We upgraded by building the new war with ant by and
replacing jetty's webapps/solr.war -- changes to schema.xml are not
taking place by the method of exchanging solr/conf/schema.xml for an
updated one with a new f
Anyone have experience working with LIUS (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lius/)? I can't seem to find any real
documentation on it, even though it seems 'active' @ sourceforge. I need a
way to index various types of fulltext, and LIUS seems very promising at
first glance. What do you guys think?
Hi,
My sorting fields include both TextField type and StrField type. Because
TextField uses TokenizerFactory, they can't be sorted. I have to copy
each TextField to a StrField and sort on those StrFields. Does anyone
know if there is a better way to do that?
Thanks
Xuesong
On 6/11/07, Xuesong Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My sorting fields include both TextField type and StrField type. Because
TextField uses TokenizerFactory, they can't be sorted. I have to copy
each TextField to a StrField and sort on those StrFields. Does anyone
know if there is a better way to
On 6/11/07, Vish D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone have experience working with LIUS (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lius/)? I can't seem to find any real
documentation on it, even though it seems 'active' @ sourceforge. I need a
way to index various types of fulltext, and LIUS seems very pr
For example, first name, department, job title etc.
Thanks
Xuesong
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about sorting
On 6/11/07, Xuesong Lu
Hi,
I'm trying to use 'fq' param (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters ) with the standard request
handler, using a field that is defined as an integer (values 1 or 0), is
indexed, and is stored. For some reason, these two return no hits, even though
I do have MyIntField with
On 11-Jun-07, at 7:22 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I'm trying to use 'fq' param (see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
CommonQueryParameters ) with the standard request handler, using a
field that is defined as an integer (values 1 or 0), is indexed,
and is stored. For some reason, these two retu
: er... since the second batch of queries returned no hits, does that
: not indicate that the problem _isn't_ with fq? You practically
: stripped it down to raw lucene territory here.
yeah, i'm with mike ... if q=birds AND MyIntField:0 returns no hits, it
doesn't suprise me that q=birds&fq=MyInt
: replacing jetty's webapps/solr.war -- changes to schema.xml are not
: taking place by the method of exchanging solr/conf/schema.xml for an
: updated one with a new field name="foobar" and restarting the sending
: the solr java process a TERM and starting afresh...
you're terminated the java proc
On 6/11/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use 'fq' param (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters ) with the standard request
handler, using a field that is defined as an integer (values 1 or 0), is
indexed, and is stored. For some reason, these
Ok. Thanks for the clarification. We will do the stripping before the
indexing.
On 11/06/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Ok. Is it possible to get back the content without the html tags?
Solr never does anything to modify the "stored" value of a field, so you'd
really need to
On 6/12/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... I think Tika will be the way forward (some of the code for Tika is
coming from LIUS)...
Work has indeed started to incoroporate the Lius code into Tika, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-7 and
http://incubator.apache.org/proj
19 matches
Mail list logo
