i wanna crawl http://www.amazone.com/ and just wanna product title ,
product information, writer, publisher.
and other data i wanna ignore.
How about
http://blog.foofactory.fi/2007/02/online-indexing-integrating-nutch-with.html
or if you're prepared to wait or help out there's
http://svn.apa
Hi,
could you tell me what is the (simplest|elegant|fast) way of implementing
the following:
I use faceted browsing, but I limit the number of facet counts to 5 (i.e.,
facet.limit=5).
1. I would like to be able to show if there are more facet values
(this can be achieved with the trick for askin
On 4/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
could you tell me what is the (simplest|elegant|fast) way of implementing
the following:
I use faceted browsing, but I limit the number of facet counts to 5 (i.e.,
facet.limit=5).
1. I would like to be able to show if there are more facet
You can approximate it by doing something like:
A:"phrase"^10 B:"phrase"^1 C:"phrase"^1000 D:"phrase"^100
E:"phrase"^30
Thanks for suggestion Mike. I tried boosting like this but all docs get
slightly different scores (because of tf, idf etc) and so secondary sort on
field X has no i
2007/4/29, Ken Krugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
now i test the newest solr (nothing modified)
i failed to start solr with resin 3.0
1. Which exact version of Resin? Still 3.0.23?
3.0.23
2. Just to confirm, you uncommented out the lines in web.xml
mentioned previously?
just newest solr's
: :you could even have the postCommit hook of your writer trigger a commit
: :call on your readers so they reopen the newly updated index.
:
: Thanks, I need "separate JVMs" so "writer triggers a commit call on readers"
: is slightly unclear... I want to use separate applications, webmodule with
:
: >>1. Which exact version of Resin? Still 3.0.23?
: >2. Just to confirm, you uncommented out the lines in web.xml
: >>mentioned previously?
: Try uncommenting out the lines in the web.xml and see if that fixes
: your problem.
Ken: I'm not very familiar withteh problem you are describing, would
: Think I will have to modify o.a.s.s.QueryParsing.parseSort to hook in custom
: sort. Is there any better way?
If you write a custom SortComparatorSource, then the easiest way to use it
would probably be to write your own subclass of TextField and override the
getSortField method to construct a
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: >>1. Which exact version of Resin? Still 3.0.23?
: >2. Just to confirm, you uncommented out the lines in web.xml
: >>mentioned previously?
: Try uncommenting out the lines in the web.xml and see if that fixes
: your problem.
Ken: I'm not very familiar withteh problem y
On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 4/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. I would like to be able to tell how many facet values are there
total. (This would be a value like numFound for the results).
Is there such a thing or a workaround like for 1.
Numb
I am trying to remove documents from my index using "delete by query".
However when I did this, the deleted
items seem to remain. This is the format of the XML file I am using -
load_id:20070424150841
load_id:20070425145301
load_id:20070426145301
load_id:20070427145302
load_id:20070428145301
load
I am trying to execute a faceted count on a field called "load_id" and want
to exclude 0s. The URL below
doesn't seem to be excluding zeros.
http://localhost:12002/solr/select/?qt=dismax&q=Y&qf=show_all_flag&fl=load_id&facet=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.field=load_id&facet.mincount=1&rows=0
Result
escher2k wrote:
I am trying to remove documents from my index using "delete by query".
However when I did this, the deleted
items seem to remain. This is the format of the XML file I am using -
load_id:20070424150841
load_id:20070425145301
load_id:20070426145301
load_id:20070427145302
load_id:20
Thanks Ryan. I need to use query since I am deleting a range of documents.
>From your
comment, I wasn't sure if one doesn't need to do an explicit commit when
using delete by query.
Does delete by query not need an explicit commit.
Thanks.
ryan mckinley wrote:
>
> escher2k wrote:
>> I am tryin
I want to capture information about the user who is executing a particular
search. Is there a way to specify in Solr that certain fields should just be
treated as pass through and not processed ? This way I can use arbitrary
params to do better logging.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
15 matches
Mail list logo