i use customer Analyzer. Now i config synonyms filter.
but it not effect.
my schema.xml write:
i think query procedure: first do myCustomerAnlyzer, two use synonyms to do
analyzed word.
if analyzed word is find in synonyms.txt and i
no one know?
2007/4/19, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i uncoment
Similarity in Schema.xmland start tomcat
i use admin gui to test and find it not effect.
maybe something is wrong, anyone know?
--
regards
jl
--
regards
jl
On Apr 19, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Ge, Yao ((Y.)) wrote:
When mutiple facet queries are specified, are they booleaned as OR or
AND?
Neither, if you're referring to &facet.query=...
facet.query's are all appended to the response, like this (in Ruby
response format):
{
'responseHeader'=>{
'sta
Hi,
I'm using filter queries to implement document level security with solr.
The caching mechanism for filters separate from queries comes in handy
and the system performs well once all the filters for the users of the
system are stored in the cache.
However, I'm storing full document content in t
Hi Erik,
No, what I need to do is
&q="my funny query"&fq=user:erik&fq=id:"doc Id"&hl=on ...
This is because the StandardRequestHandler needs the original query to do
proper highlighting.
The user gets his paginated result page with his next 10 hits. He can then
select one document for hig
thanks, this worked like a charm !!
we built a custom "QueryParser" and we integrated the *foo** in it, so
basically we can now search leading, trailing and both ...
only crappy thing is the max Boolean clauses, but i'm going to look into
that after the weekend
for the next release of Solr :
d
Maarten:
Would you mind sharing your custom query parser?
On 4/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thanks, this worked like a charm !!
we built a custom "QueryParser" and we integrated the *foo** in it, so
basically we can now search leading, trailing and both ...
only crapp
On Apr 20, 2007, at 7:11 AM, Burkamp, Christian wrote:
I'm using filter queries to implement document level security with
solr.
The caching mechanism for filters separate from queries comes in handy
and the system performs well once all the filters for the users of the
system are stored in the
Updated (forgot the patch for Servlet).
http://www.nabble.com/file/7996/solr-trunk-src.patch solr-trunk-src.patch
The change should still be compatible with the trunk it is based upon.
Henrib wrote:
>
> Following up on a previous thread in the Solr-User list, here is a patch
> that allows ma
Hi. I have some result ordering requirements which I can not solve
searching the doco and forums to this point. Perhaps what I am trying does
not belong in solr. Can anyone offer any hint or suggestion before I
disappear into a vortex of terror?
I need to conditionally order results of phrase
Hey Erik,
thanks for the fast reply. Yes this could be possible. I currently got
solr running for the indexing of a forum with 100k users. It could
definitely be possible that two commits overlap. But I need to commit
all changes because the new posts must be available in the search as
soon a
Hi Erik,
Please find my comments under ">>>" to your queries.
> : 1. What are other alternatives are available for ruby integration
> with solr
> : other than acts-as_solr plugin.
acts_as_solr is purely for ActiveRecord (database O/R mapping)
integration with Solr, such that when you cr
On Apr 20, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Burkamp, Christian wrote:
No, what I need to do is
&q="my funny query"&fq=user:erik&fq=id:"doc Id"&hl=on ...
No you don't what you need is:
&q="my funny query" AND id:"doc Id"&fq=user:erik&hl=on
This is because the StandardRequestHandler needs t
On 4/20/07, Burkamp, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Erik,
No, what I need to do is
&q="my funny query"&fq=user:erik&fq=id:"doc Id"&hl=on ...
This is because the StandardRequestHandler needs the original query to do
proper highlighting.
The user gets his paginated result page with
On 4/20/07, Michael Thessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Erik,
thanks for the fast reply. Yes this could be possible. I currently got
solr running for the indexing of a forum with 100k users. It could
definitely be possible that two commits overlap. But I need to commit
all changes because the
On 4/20/07, Simon Kahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to conditionally order results of phrase searches like this:
* First show all docs with phrase in field A - regardless of other
occurences of phrase in doc - ordered alphabetically by field X
* Next show all docs with phrase in field B - .
Mike Klaas wrote:
On 4/20/07, Michael Thessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Erik,
thanks for the fast reply. Yes this could be possible. I currently got
solr running for the indexing of a forum with 100k users. It could
definitely be possible that two commits overlap. But I need to commit
all
Michael Thessel wrote:
Mike Klaas wrote:
On 4/20/07, Michael Thessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Erik,
thanks for the fast reply. Yes this could be possible. I currently got
solr running for the indexing of a forum with 100k users. It could
definitely be possible that two commits overlap. B
On 4/20/07, Michael Thessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The timed commits don't work for me. The webinterface says 0 commits
since the server was restarted. And nothing in the logs as well.
I use:
apache-solr-1.1.0-incubating
Sorry about that--I see that that change was added a few weeks after
On 4/20/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i use customer Analyzer. Now i config synonyms filter.
but it not effect.
my schema.xml write:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
i think query procedure: first do myCustomerAnlyzer, two use synonyms to d
On 4/19/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i uncoment
Similarity in Schema.xmland start tomcat
i use admin gui to test and find it not effect.
If no similarity is specified, Lucene's DefaultSimilarity is used.
The Similarity you uncommented in the example schema.xml specifies
Lucene's D
Hi Yonik,
Thanks for your quick response, my question is this, can we take incremental
backup/replication in SOLR?
Regards,
Doss.
M. MOHANDOSS Software Engineer Ext: 507 (A BharatMatrimony Enterprise)
- Original Message -
From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday
22 matches
Mail list logo