Thomas - you will need to do this client-side if you don't want to
use copyField. The client needs to gather up all the text you want
indexed and send that as
Erik
On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:50 AM, thomas arni wrote:
Hello
I'm currently evaluate solr for our needs. In a first st
You can even put multiple entries into one
document. The text field needs to be defined multi-valued for this to work.
You can put each chunk of data to its own text field.
Perhaps this approach is best suited for what you want to do?
--Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Er
Thanks for your reply Erik. I will use your suggested approach.
IMHO this could be something to add for future versions of solr. The
Terrier IR-framework for example and other IR solutions allow to specify
different XML-elements, which should be indexed in only one (lucene) field.
As I said i
What are people doing to restrict UpdateServlet access on production
installs of Solr. Are people removing that option and rotating in a new
index or restricting access from the jetty side.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Gunther, Andrew wrote:
What are people doing to restrict UpdateServlet access on production
installs of Solr. Are people removing that option and rotating in
a new
index or restricting access from the jetty side.
The recommendation is to firewall off Solr so o
The recommendation is to firewall off Solr so only your application
server can access it. Solr is not at all designed for direct
client (browser, etc) access.
Assuming you lock down update properly, what's the problem? We are
currently using select directly through the XSLTResponseWrite
On Mar 14, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Brian Whitman wrote:
The recommendation is to firewall off Solr so only your
application server can access it. Solr is not at all designed
for direct client (browser, etc) access.
Assuming you lock down update properly, what's the problem? We are
current
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I figured out my problem. My own jar must be in the examples/solr/lib
: directory (which does not exist in the download). I found a hint to
: this on the mailing list. The docs don't indicate this anywhere
: promenant. Perhaps the lib directory should exist in the d
I have several indexes now (4 at the moment, 20gb each, and I want to be
able to drop in a new machine easily). I'm using SQL server as a DB and
it scales well. The DB doesn't get hit too hard, mostly doing location
lookups, and the app does some checking to make sure a document has
really c
Gunther, Andrew wrote:
What are people doing to restrict UpdateServlet access on production
installs of Solr. Are people removing that option and rotating in a new
index or restricting access from the jetty side.
I'm putting Solr on my DMZ without direct WAN access. If I had to put it
on
On 3/14/07, Maximilian Hütter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is the default heap size for the Sun JVM, so I guess 64MB max. The
documents are rather large, but if you manage to index 100,000 docs,
there seems to be some problem with Solr.
The documents are not held in memory until a commit occu
:
: IMHO this could be something to add for future versions of solr. The
: Terrier IR-framework for example and other IR solutions allow to specify
: different XML-elements, which should be indexed in only one (lucene) field.
I don't know anythign about Terrier, but there are lots of simple ways t
: It is the default heap size for the Sun JVM, so I guess 64MB max. The
: documents are rather large, but if you manage to index 100,000 docs,
: there seems to be some problem with Solr.
i think you mean "there DOES NOT seems to be some problem with Solr."
right ... why would Mike being able to c
:
: Makes sense, I guess I was looking for a mention in the online
: documentation for the xml file where it mentions how to specify your own
: similarity. Somehow I never stumbled on the other two spots.
Hmmm... you mean http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml right?
yeah i can see how that woul
Sweet, looks like someone beat me to it.
Tim
Chris Hostetter wrote:
:
: Makes sense, I guess I was looking for a mention in the online
: documentation for the xml file where it mentions how to specify your own
: similarity. Somehow I never stumbled on the other two spots.
Hmmm... you mean ht
Hi Jed,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and the link.
Venkatesh
On 3/11/07, Jed Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Venkatesh Seetharam wrote:
>
>> The hash idea sounds really interesting and if I had a fixed number of
> indexes it would be perfect.
> I'm infact looking around for a reve
Is there a way to reload schema.xml while solr is running?
TIA
Debra
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Reload-schema.xml-tf3404798.html#a9483346
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Is there a way to reload schema.xml while solr is running?
Afraid not ...there's a lot of interdependencies between the way the
IndexSchema, the RequestHandlers, the SolrCore, and updates work ... so i
supsect atttempting to add something like that would require a lot of
tricky synchronization
That was quick... I was editing my question while you sent the answer.
I would appreciate if you can take a look at the edited question.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : Is there a way to reload schema.xml while solr is running?
>
> Afraid not ...there's a lot of interdependencies between the w
I'm not sure if i'm understanding your question ... i was going to mention
SOLR-69 as a possible solution for your goal, but i see you've commented
on that issue so you are already aware of it ... doesn't that code do what
you are describing (by using the facet fields as the mlt.fl ?)
I have to
: That was quick... I was editing my question while you sent the answer.
: I would appreciate if you can take a look at the edited question.
i'm not sure i understand ... did you send a reply? i didn't get other
messages from you.
Oh crap ... so you used nabble.com to send your message right? an
From Chris's ApacheCon talk on Solr (nice one BTW) I see that nabble
is apparently using Solr for search? I noticed that the screenshot of
nabble.com in the presentation and the current site has some form of
hierarchy displayed when you search.
Is this done by Solr? Just lokoing for a clue as t
On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
I'm not sure if i'm understanding your question ... i was going to
mention
SOLR-69 as a possible solution for your goal, but i see you've
commented
on that issue so you are already aware of it ... doesn't that code
do what
you are desc
:
: >From Chris's ApacheCon talk on Solr (nice one BTW) I see that nabble
: is apparently using Solr for search? I noticed that the screenshot of
: nabble.com in the presentation and the current site has some form of
: hierarchy displayed when you search.
Nabble does aparently use Lucene, but i w
: The problem with SOLR-69 is that faceting does not operate on MLT
: results. If this was fixed we could do
ah... i see, you're tlaking about getting facet counts based on the MLT
results, not the main results ... i think somoene (Yonik?) suggested
extracting MLT into a seperate request handler
On 3/15/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nabble does aparently use Lucene, but i was not trying to suggest that
they use Solr ... that screenshot was in a section where i was explaining
what faceted searching is, and using them as an example of a UI with a
single facet (which happen
I don't know how to test,,Maybe someone can tell me.
Thks Chris Advice.
--
regards
jl
Hi,
I am trying to use DisMax handler in order to search multiple fields
but i don't get results back.
Assume the fields i want to search on are "abc", "def", "ghi" and
"jkl" then i changed solrconfig.xml to this:
explicit
0.01
abc^2 def ghi^0.1 jkl
When i run
: Subject: Anyone know How to test CustomerAnalyzer with jsp?
:
: I don't know how to test,,Maybe someone can tell me.
how about something like...
<%
Analyzer a = new CustomerAnalyzer();
TokenStream t = a.tokenStream("f", new StringReader("test"));
%>
<%= t.next().toString() %>
-Hoss
: When i run my query with qt=dismax i don't get results:
:
: /solr/select/?qt=dismax&q=blablabla%3BRelevanc
: +desc&version=2.2&start=0&rows=1&indent=on&fl=*,score
:
: when i remove the qt=dismax i do get result back:
:
: /solr/select/?q=blablabla%3BRelevanc
: +desc&version=2.2&start=0&rows=1&ind
Is there a way to reload schema.xml while solr is running?
As a newbiie Java programmer I'm not sure what happens if I do the
following:
SolrCore core = new SolrCore(null,null);
Will it replace the current core? What happens to requests that are running?
What if I do?
SolrCore core =Sol
Thanks, that did the trick but now i have another problem (the
documentation is very little).
It fails when i try to boost terms in the query, i.e.
I get results for :
qt=dismax&q=blabla&version=2.2&start=0&rows=1&indent=on&fl=*,score&debugQuery=true&sort=length_seconds+desc
but no results for:
32 matches
Mail list logo
