Re: production solr - app server choice ?

2007-03-10 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Mar 9, 2007, at 6:46 AM, rubdabadub wrote: On 3/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We use jetty on a few applications with no problem. I recommend it unless and until you outgrow it (but I doubt you will). Resin, in my past experience with it, is fantastic. But no need to even

Re: production solr - app server choice ?

2007-03-10 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 3/9/07, rubdabadub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...The site is a local portal and the traffic is very high and I am not sure if Jetty is enough maybe it is Just an additional note on this: asking four people about what "very high" traffic means might also give you five different answers ;

Re: production solr - app server choice ?

2007-03-10 Thread James liu
I use jetty and tomcat 6 under win2003. They all work well. 2007/3/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 3/9/07, rubdabadub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...The site is a local portal and the traffic is very high and I am not > sure if Jetty is enough maybe it is Just an addi

Re: production solr - app server choice ?

2007-03-10 Thread rubdabadub
Thanks for the feedback! I was planning to test but I wanted to know what other were using. I have been using tomcat extensively but got tired of it (no technical reason). Jetty sounds too simple so I thought I ask :-) Never tried Resin but it has some good reputation. The local portal is using

Adding data as UTF-8

2007-03-10 Thread Morten Fangel
Hi, I've been working on adding some Solr-integration into my current project, but have run into a problem with non-ascii characters. I send a document like the following: --- 228 Vedhæft billede til min formular 26 Jeg har lavet en side som skal info om værkstedet Badsetuen i Odense

Re: Adding data as UTF-8

2007-03-10 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 3/10/07, Morten Fangel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...I send a document like the following: --- ... I assume you're using your own code to "send" the document? Currently you need to include a "Content-type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8" header in your HTTP POST request, and (as you're doing) th

Re: Adding data as UTF-8

2007-03-10 Thread Morten Fangel
On Saturday 10 March 2007 21:39, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On 3/10/07, Morten Fangel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ...I send a document like the following: > > > > --- > > ... > > I assume you're using your own code to "send" the document? Indeed. Solr will be integrated (almost) transparently

Re: Adding data as UTF-8

2007-03-10 Thread Walter Underwood
It is better to use "application/xml". See RFC 3023. Using "text/xml; charset=UTF-8" will override the XML encoding declaration. "application/xml" will not. wunder On 3/10/07 12:39 PM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/10/07, Morten Fangel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> .

Re: Adding data as UTF-8

2007-03-10 Thread Morten Fangel
On Saturday 10 March 2007 22:18, Walter Underwood wrote: > It is better to use "application/xml". See RFC 3023. > Using "text/xml; charset=UTF-8" will override the XML > encoding declaration. "application/xml" will not. Thanks for the info. I've changed the header accordingly. -fangel

Re: Adding data as UTF-8

2007-03-10 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 3/10/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It is better to use "application/xml". See RFC 3023. Using "text/xml; charset=UTF-8" will override the XML encoding declaration. "application/xml" will not... I agree, but did you try this with our example setup, started with "java -jar st

Re: Adding data as UTF-8

2007-03-10 Thread Walter Underwood
If it does something different, that is a bug. RFC 3023 is clear. --wunder On 3/10/07 1:49 PM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/10/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It is better to use "application/xml". See RFC 3023. >> Using "text/xml; charset=UTF-8" will

Re: Adding data as UTF-8

2007-03-10 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 3/10/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If it does something different, that is a bug. RFC 3023 is clear. --wunder.. Sure - just wanted to confirm what I'm seeing, thanks! -Bertrand

Question About Boosting.

2007-03-10 Thread shai deljo
How can i boost some tokens over others in the same field (at Index time) ? If this is not supported directly, what's the best way around this problem (what's the hack to solve this :) ). Thanks, Shai

Re: Question About Boosting.

2007-03-10 Thread Walter Underwood
What are you trying to achieve? Let's start with the problem instead of picking one solution which Solr doesn't support. --wunder On 3/10/07 5:08 PM, "shai deljo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can i boost some tokens over others in the same field (at Index > time) ? If this is not supported di

Re: Question About Boosting.

2007-03-10 Thread shai deljo
I have elements within a field that have different importance. I thought boosting would be an elegant way to take this into account. Please advise, On 3/10/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What are you trying to achieve? Let's start with the problem instead of picking one solutio

Re: Federated Search

2007-03-10 Thread Jed Reynolds
Venkatesh Seetharam wrote: The hash idea sounds really interesting and if I had a fixed number of indexes it would be perfect. I'm infact looking around for a reverse-hash algorithm where in given a docId, I should be able to find which partition contains the document so I can save cycles