Way to go Bess! This is great stuff you're sharing.
I have a question though...
On Jan 16, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Bess Sadler wrote:
Currently, we are assigning all fields, no matter what language to
type string, defined as
sortMissingLast="true"/>
This does string matching very well, but do
Hi,
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 13:42 +, Luis Neves wrote:
I think you should explain your use case a wee bit more.
What I do now to index XML documents it's to use a Filter to strip
the markup,
this works but it's impossible to know where in the document is the ma
Hello,
Reading the javadocs from the DisMaxRequestHandler I see that is possible to use
"Boost Functions" to influence the score. How would that work in order to
improve the score of recent documents? (I have a timestamp field in the
schema)... I'm assuming it's possible (right?), but I can't
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 09:36 +, Luis Neves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 13:42 +, Luis Neves wrote:
>
> >
> > I think you should explain your use case a wee bit more.
> >
> What I do now to index XML documents it's to use a Filter to strip
> > t
solr have its replication way and it use rsync transport.
i try it but not success maybe because i m poor in freebsd.(if u know how to
config and use, tell me and i will be very happy.:) )
when i use mysql replication, i think why not use it?
master: mysql (innodb or isam), slave: mysql(isam)
On 1/17/07, Luis Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I see that is possible to use
"Boost Functions" to influence the score. How would that work in order to
improve the score of recent documents? (I have a timestamp field in the
schema)...
I've been using expressions like these in boolean quer
On 1/17/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
when i use mysql replication, i think why not use it?
Perhaps doable, but every slave would need to re-index the same
documents pulled from the db. It would be more CPU and resource
intensive and harder to keep in sync. If you get a corrupted d
Solr has just graduated from the Incubator, and has been accepted as a
Lucene sub-project!
Thanks to all the Lucene and Solr users, contributors, and developers
who helped make this happen!
I have a feeling we're just getting started :-)
-Yonik
Hi,
I agree, this is not a legal URL. But the thing is that cocoon itself is
sending the unescaped URL. That is why I thought I am not using the right
tools from cocoon.
mirko
Quoting Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> : java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 505 for
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree, this is not a legal URL. But the thing is that cocoon itself is
> sending the unescaped URL.
...because you told it so.
You use
http://hostname/solr/select/?q={request-param:q}";
type="file" >
The request para
On Jan 17, 2007, at 3:07 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Why are you assigning all fields to a "string" type? That indexes
each field as-is, with no tokenization at all. How are you using
that field from the front-end? I'd think you'd want to copyField
everything into a "text" field.
The sho
On 1/17/07, Luis Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I see that is possible to use
"Boost Functions" to influence the score. How would that work in order to
improve the score of recent documents? (I have a timestamp field in the
schema)...
I've been using expressions like these in boolean quer
Thanks Thorsten,
that really was helpful. Cocoon's url-encode module does solve my problem.
mirko
Quoting Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I agree, this is not a legal URL. But the thing is that cocoon itself
Congrats to all involved committers on the project as well. Solr is an
invaluable system in my operation. Great job.
On 1/17/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Solr has just graduated from the Incubator, and has been accepted as a
Lucene sub-project!
Thanks to all the Lucene and Solr
Congratulations Yonik and the Solr team!
I just got started playing with Solr (having done all with "raw" Lucene and
Java object caches only until now)
Too bad I can't reach the issue tracker now, as I want to contribute a PHP
responsewriter to Solr. This work is also a start for a set of generi
Hello all:
We've got one java-based project at work using lucene. I'm looking to use
solr as a search system for some other projects at work. Once data is
indexed in solr, can we get at it using standard lucene libraries? I know
how I want to use solr, but if the java devs need to get at the d
Hi Michael,
What Solr is really doing is building a Lucene index. In most cases a
Java developer should be able to access the index that Solr built through
the IndexReader/IndexSearcher classes and the location of the index that
Solr built. See the Lucene API for details on these and othe
Thanks - that helps, and ideally should help with adoption questions here.
You said "most cases" - I've read something about "solr extends lucene" in
the docs. Are there some specific solr-only bits of functionality that
would preclude vanilla-lucene code from accessing solr-created indexes?
On
: Thanks - that helps, and ideally should help with adoption questions here.
: You said "most cases" - I've read something about "solr extends lucene" in
: the docs. Are there some specific solr-only bits of functionality that
: would preclude vanilla-lucene code from accessing solr-created index
: i try it but not success maybe because i m poor in freebsd.(if u know how to
: config and use, tell me and i will be very happy.:) )
for the record, i'm sure the bug with using the distribution scripts on
FreeBSD is a minor one, it just needs someone with some expertise in
BSD/bash to take a lo
: > "Boost Functions" to influence the score. How would that work in order to
: > improve the score of recent documents? (I have a timestamp field in the
: I've been using expressions like these in boolean queries, based on a
: "broadcast_date" field:
:
: _val_:"linear(recip(rord(broadcast_date)
: OK, you lost me. It sounds as if this PhraseQuery-ish approach involves
: breaking datetime and lat/long values into pieces, and evaluation occurs
: with positioning. Is that accurate?
i'm not sure what you mean by pieces ... the idea is that you would have a
single "latitude" field and a sin
I have a requirement wherein the documents that are retrieved based on the
similarity computation
are bucketed and resorted based on user score.
An example -
Let us say a search returns the following data set -
Doc ID Lucene score User score
10001000 125
1000 900
Re: Bucketing result set (User list posting)...
Please don't post solr-user questions on solr-dev. Crossposting is
bad; multi-posting is even worse. Most if not all of solr dev's read
solr-user and will respond to you there.
On 1/17/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a requireme
Now I follow. I was misreading the first comments, thinking that the field
content would be deconstructed to smaller components or pieces. Too much
(or not enough) coffee.
I'm expecting the index doc needs to be constructed with lat/long/dates in
sequential order, i.e.:
123
32.123456
On 1/17/07, Paul Borgermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulations Yonik and the Solr team!
I just got started playing with Solr (having done all with "raw" Lucene and
Java object caches only until now)
Too bad I can't reach the issue tracker now, as I want to contribute a PHP
responsewrite
26 matches
Mail list logo
