Hi,
I have some doubts about dynamic fields, when we add a doc with a new
dynamic filed, this new dynamic filed is only "append" to doc's that will
have it defined in the xml, or for every document in the index?
My documents may have more the one client classification and I think that I
coul
Hi,
I want users to add content to my site using tinyMCE, which generates HTML.
When I tried adding the data to Solr, Solr refused to add it (or at least
generated an error):
SEVERE: org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException: parser must be on START_TAG
or TEXT to read text (position: START_TAG seen
Whatever programming language you are using probably has a function that
makes "xml-safe" text. For example, I'm using Coldfusion to integrate with
Solr and all data is set like follows:
#xmlformat(usergeneratedcontent)#
My guess is PHP, ASP, etc. all have a function like this
On 9/20/06, Nick
On 9/20/06, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My step to support CJK...:
1:add lucene-analyzers-2.0.0.jar to
"C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\lib"
2:use cmd, "cd C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly","ant dist"
3:copy "C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\dist\solr- 1.0.war" to
"C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\example\weba
2006/9/20, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/20/06, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My step to support CJK...:
> 1:add lucene-analyzers-2.0.0.jar to
> "C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\lib"
> 2:use cmd, "cd C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly","ant dist"
> 3:copy "C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\dist\so
i m java newer. so i print these steps.
solr tutorial i test is ok.
anything you wanna know, mail me.
attachements: schema.xml2006/9/20, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i m java newer. so i print these steps.solr tutorial i test is ok.anything you wanna know, mail me.-- regardsjl
id
content
On 9/20/06, Marcio Pinto Motta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have some doubts about dynamic fields, when we add a doc with a new
dynamic filed, this new dynamic filed is only "append" to doc's that will
have it defined in the xml, or for every document in the index?
Just for documents that the
On 9/19/06, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4:modify schema(conf/schema.conf), like yours,,just ""
Are you testing the same field to which you are adding the analyzer?
I noticed in another mail that you added this to the "text_lu" field
type--the solr example uses "text", as I recall.
-M
: > I have some doubts about dynamic fields, when we add a doc with a new
: > dynamic filed, this new dynamic filed is only "append" to doc's that will
: > have it defined in the xml, or for every document in the index?
:
: Just for documents that the field appears in.
the one thing to keep an e
: 6:start jetty,java -jar start.jar
: 7:no error.
: 8: http://localhost:8983/solr/admin,,,i click analyzer link,,,and try
: test analyzer chinese word,but nothing happend.
...i don't know much about non latin characters but i tried making the
same changes you did, and asked a coworker who speaks
: you find index data from my attachements. its name is solr.jpg and lucene
: breaking well, its name is lucene.jpg
FYI: the mailing list only allows text attachments, if you want to refer
to images you have to send a URL to an image online somewhere instead.
-Hoss
: I know this is a complex one, but it help me to be able to make a dynamic
: copy field, like:
:
:
: The goal is to have for each string index a tokenized one.
: It does not seem possible at the moment, but will it be in the foreseeable
: future?
I assume you mean you are interested in sup
On 9/20/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
I assume you mean you are interested in supporting something like that
where whatever the "*" matches in the "source" is also matches in the
"target" right? ... I don't know ofanyone working on it right now, but
it's certainly someth
to mike:
" Are you testing the same field to which you are adding the analyzer?
I noticed in another mail that you added this to the "text_lu" field
type--the solr example uses "text", as I recall."
now my schema.xml:
111
姓名是刘平
112
姓名是小王
113
老婆不在家
but i m f
Hoss, thk for ur help
2006/9/21, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: 6:start jetty,java -jar start.jar
: 7:no error.
: 8: http://localhost:8983/solr/admin,,,i click analyzer link,,,and try
: test analyzer chinese word,but nothing happend.
...i don't know much about non latin characters bu
sorry,,it is wrong...
my schema.xml
id
content
在06-9-21,James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道:
to mike:
" Are you testing the same field to which you are adding the analyzer?
I noticed in another mail that you added this to the "text_lu" field
type--the so
i use lukeall.jar to check indexdata.
u can find picture from http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/?saved=1
solr.jpg is i use lukeall.jar to check solr's index data.
lucene.jpg is i use lukeall.jar to check lucene's index data.
now i use lucene is ok.
i dont know it is import i add junit
when i use ant dist,,,it show me error information : not found junit,,,so i
download and add it.
Is it problem about CJKAnalyzer?
i recompile it.
when i ant dist...cmd shows some api is old and uncheck...
Is it problem?
my java version you can find
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/?saved=1
2006/9/21, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i dont know it is import i add junit
when i use ant dist,,,it show
Hi,
Is the main difference between the StandardQueryHandler and DisMaxQueryHandler
the supported query syntax (and different query parser used in each of them),
and the fact that the latter creates DisjunctionMaxQueries, while the former
just creates vanilla BooleanQueries? Are there any other
thk Hoss,Nick Snels,Koji,Mike and everybody who helped me and wanna help
me..
i can use solr with Chinese Word.
i just wanna say: no your help,maybe i will give up.thk u again.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/248815068/
2006/9/21, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
thk Hoss,Nick Snels,Koji,Mike and everybody who helped me and wanna help
me..
i can use solr with Chinese Word.
--
: Is the main difference between the StandardQueryHandler and
: DisMaxQueryHandler the supported query syntax (and different query
: parser used in each of them), and the fact that the latter creates
: DisjunctionMaxQueries, while the former just creates vanilla
: BooleanQueries? Are there any ot
24 matches
Mail list logo