Hi James,
now you should make a FilterFactory, there are a few examples in
c:\solr-nightly\src\java\org\apache\solr\analysis . You should also place
your FilterFactory in this directory and rerun 'ant dist'. I have made a
DutchStemFilterFactory class and this is the code:
package org.apache.solr
today not Ok。i check source of cjk: CJKAnalyzer.java and CJKTokenizer.java (these from lucene 2.0 source code)and your code,,,i write CJKJLFilterFactory.java and CJKJLTokenizerFactory.javaant is ok.i
copy new solr.war to tomcat's webappsand modify schema.xml use admin page, i use http://localh
On 9/18/06, Michael Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> For cases like "author", if there is only one value per document, then
> a possible fix is to use the field cache. If there can be multiple
> occurrences, there doesn't seem to be a good way that preserves exact
> coun
Michael Imbeault wrote:
Also, is there any plans to add an option not to run a facet search if
the result set is too big? To avoid 40 seconds queries if the docset
is too large...
You could run one query with facet=false, check the result size and then
run it again (should be fast because i
I just updated the comments in solrconfig.xml:
On 9/18/06, Michael Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another followup: I bumped all the caches in solrconfig.xml to
size="1600384"
initialSize="400096"
autowarmCount="400096"
It seemed to fix the problem on a very smal
Hi James,
don't give up, your very close to having it work. If you can get CJKAnalyzer
and CJKTokenizer to work in Lucene, you should also be able to get it to
work in Solr. Look at the bright site, at least ant doesn't throw any
errors. And my code isn't going to work, since it really cann't han
Hi,
I know this is a complex one, but it help me to be able to make a dynamic
copy field, like:
The goal is to have for each string index a tokenized one.
It does not seem possible at the moment, but will it be in the foreseeable
future?
Thanks anyway !
>
Paul Terray
Hi,
Using a lot of dynamic fields, Id like to simplify the field types. I had a
question on this: is there an advantage to have a field declared as single
valued, as opposed to multi-valued?
Thanks
>
Paul Terray
Consultant Avant-Vente
>
SOLLAN
27, bis rue du Prog
On 9/19/06, Paul Terray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using a lot of dynamic fields, I'd like to simplify the field types. I had a
question on this: is there an advantage to have a field declared as single
valued, as opposed to multi-valued?
The response of single valued fields is smaller (no enca
I’m experiencing some unusual behavior when I perform a search with
highlighting enabled.
I’ve set up “id” as “sint” and indexed properly, but performing a search gives
the following result:
3.0647626
2
369845
1
Microsoft Reorganizes
Microsoft Reorganizes
3.0647626
On 9/19/06, Brian Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The unusual characters on lst name="…" are what I can't figure out, as it
DEFINITELY
is not the id. I've tried indexed id with "integer", "sint", and "string" all
with the
same result.
Yes, looks like you hit a bug where you are seeing the "
On 9/19/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The fix would be to use
FieldType.indexedToReadable() to convert the indexed form back to a
readable form.
Oops, that should be storedToReadable since the id is obtained from
the stored fields, not from the index.
Hmmm, a quick look at the co
Yonik, thanks for the tip.
Converting to 'integer' and deleting/reindexing fixed it. Can 'sint' be
used for the id with highlighting, or does one need to use integer or string
for that? Just trying to figure out if it's a bug with sint, or possibly
due to the fact I could have changed sint to i
On 9/19/06, Brian Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Converting to 'integer' and deleting/reindexing fixed it. Can 'sint' be
used for the id with highlighting, or does one need to use integer or string
for that?
It should be usable (but I personally haven't tested that).
If it's not, it's a bug a
: I have went through my archives and I have found that people also have used
: something similar to:
:
:
:
:
Correct. If you want to use a Lucene analyzer "as is" all you need to do
is specify the class name. if you wnat to make an analyzer on the fly
from a tokenizer and some tokenfil
: maybe i should get cron through cygwin..
:
: my system is win2003,not unix.
:
: today i try ./snappuller,,,but it seems wrong and i set master port,
: directory,snap directory
The CollectionDistribution scripts may not work well on windows -- many of
them require hardlinks which may or may-not
Quick Question: did you say you are faceting on the first name field
seperately from the last name field? ... why?
You'll probably see a sharp increase in performacne if you have a single
untokenized author field containing hte full name and you facet on that --
there will be a lot less unique te
On 9/19/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick Question: did you say you are faceting on the first name field
seperately from the last name field? ... why?
You'll probably see a sharp increase in performacne if you have a single
untokenized author field containing hte full name an
I am trying to integrate solr search results with results from a rdbms
query. It's working ok, but fairly complicated due to large size of
the results from the database, and many different sort requirements.
I know that solr/lucene was not designed to intelligently handle
multiple document t
: > when we facet on the authors, we start with
: > that list and go in order, generating their facet constraint count using
: > the DocSet intersection just like we currently do ... if we reach our
: > facet.limit before we reach the end of hte list and the lowest constraint
: > count is higher t
: I just updated the comments in solrconfig.xml:
I've tweaked the SolrCaching wiki page to include some of this info as
well, feel free to add any additional info you think would be helpful to
other people (or ask any qestions about it if any of it still doesn't seem
clear to you)...
htt
My step to support CJK...:1:add lucene-analyzers-2.0.0.jar to "C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\lib"2:use cmd, "cd C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly","ant dist"3:copy "C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\dist\solr-
1.0.war" to "C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\example\webapps\solr.war"4:modify schema(conf/schema.conf), like
i see,thk u.
2006/9/20, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: maybe i should get cron through cygwin..
:
: my system is win2003,not unix.
:
: today i try ./snappuller,,,but it seems wrong and i set master port,
: directory,snap directory
The CollectionDistribution scripts may not work well o
i'd like to hear "I would start by trying to use the CJKAnalyzer as is with
the syntax,described above."
if need tester, call me.
2006/9/20, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: I have went through my archives and I have found that people also have
used
: something similar to:
:
:
:
24 matches
Mail list logo
