Re: where's the bottleneck

2008-10-30 Thread Yonik Seeley
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:28 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: where's the bottleneck > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Barnett, Jeffrey > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

RE: where's the bottleneck

2008-10-29 Thread Barnett, Jeffrey
I thought it was turned off already. ( Lucene vs Solr ?) Where do I make this change? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:28 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: where'

Re: where's the bottleneck

2008-10-29 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Barnett, Jeffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reported import rates start a 70 docs per second, and decrease as more > records are added. It might just be segment merges (that takes more time as segments grow in size). >From the solrconfig.xml I see you have autoc

where's the bottleneck

2008-10-29 Thread Barnett, Jeffrey
I saw a similar subject posted earlier. This is not a continuation of that thread, but the problem is similar. I have a large, fast, dedicated machine, that despite boosting various parameters in solrconfig.xml (attached) and in the JVM, utilizes at most 10% of the cpu while importing: (from t