https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898 has been created for this.
Thanx Martijn!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/when-using-group-true-facet-numbers-are-incorrect-tp3488605p3551741.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
still returns numbers of documents, not numbers of groups.
> This is why I advocated the name group.truncate instead of
> group.after, and have avoided any mention of "post grouping" on the
> wiki page.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
How to go about if yo
That works well, thanks very much.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I understand that's a valid thing for faceting to do, I was just
> wondering
> : if there's any way to get it to do the faceting on the groups returned.
> : Otherwise I guess I'll need to convince the
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I understand that's a valid thing for faceting to do, I was just wondering
> : if there's any way to get it to do the faceting on the groups returned.
> : Otherwise I guess I'll need to convince the UI people to just show the
> : facets
: I understand that's a valid thing for faceting to do, I was just wondering
: if there's any way to get it to do the faceting on the groups returned.
: Otherwise I guess I'll need to convince the UI people to just show the
: facets without the numbers.
what you are asking about is generally refe
Hi,
I've noticed that when field collapsing and faceting are both used in the
one query the facet numbers ignore the grouping. In my example I have three
documents (I have a small index for testing) and if I group on a certain
field I get two groups in the results but the facet numbers show that t
