e again the infrastructure for running tests
Günter
On 09/05/2012 11:19 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Subject: Re: use of filter queries in Lucene/Solr Alpha40 and Beta4.0
Günter, This is definitely strange
The good news is, i can reproduce your problem.
The bad news is, i can reproduce you
27;m so happy you realized the problem because I was quite worried
>>> about it!!
>>>
>>> Let me know if I can provide support with testing it.
>>> The last two days I was busy with migrating a bunch of hosts which should
>>> -hopefully- be finished today.
ay.
Then I have again the infrastructure for running tests
Günter
On 09/05/2012 11:19 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Subject: Re: use of filter queries in Lucene/Solr Alpha40 and Beta4.0
Günter, This is definitely strange
The good news is, i can reproduce your problem.
The bad news is, i can rep
inished today.
> Then I have again the infrastructure for running tests
>
> Günter
>
>
> On 09/05/2012 11:19 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>
>> : Subject: Re: use of filter queries in Lucene/Solr Alpha40 and Beta4.0
>>
>> Günter, This is definitely strange
>&
nning tests
Günter
On 09/05/2012 11:19 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Subject: Re: use of filter queries in Lucene/Solr Alpha40 and Beta4.0
Günter, This is definitely strange
The good news is, i can reproduce your problem.
The bad news is, i can reproduce your problem - and i have no idea what'
: Subject: Re: use of filter queries in Lucene/Solr Alpha40 and Beta4.0
Günter, This is definitely strange
The good news is, i can reproduce your problem.
The bad news is, i can reproduce your problem - and i have no idea what's
causing it.
I've opened SOLR-3793 to try to get to
I made more tests with the Lucene/SOLR 4.0 version deployed in March and
the latest Lucene 4.0 beta version over the weekend.
My findings:
- the version deployed in march doesn't contain the error I now come across
in Beta4.0 (The number of documents part of the facetcounts differs
from the rea
Hi,
thanks for your responses!
I made a more simple query with only one facet and without any boosting
stuff so it should be easier to focus the problem
facet=on&facet.mincount=1&facet.limit=100&rows=0&start=0&q=+(+%2Bmitbestimmung++)+&facet.field=navNetwork&qt=only_queryfields_edismax&debugQuer
The "q" and "bq" params have changed slightly between your first query and
the query where you add the "fq" param ... because of how "bq" is
additively added to the main query, it's possible this difference may
account for the behavior your are seeing -- double check the debugQuery
output for
:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: use of filter queries in Lucene/Solr Alpha40 and Beta4.0
Hi all,
My query against an index is (I leaved out some of the facet fields)
f.navBranchlib.facet.limit=1000&
facet=on&facet.mincount=1&
facet.limit=100&
bq=navBranchl
Hi all,
My query against an index is (I leaved out some of the facet fields)
f.navBranchlib.facet.limit=1000&
facet=on&facet.mincount=1&
facet.limit=100&
bq=navBranchlib:A100^1000&
bq=navBranchlib:UFSW^1000&
start=0&q=+(+%2Bmitbestimmung++)+&
facet.field=navNetwork&
qt=sb-bbfull-01
-> qt refers to
11 matches
Mail list logo