___
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
>> below:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/two-cores-but-have-single-result-set-in-solr-tp3363043p3364157.html
>>
>> To unsubscribe from two cores but have single resu
See this: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch
>
>
> ___
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/two-cores-but-have-single-result-set-in-solr-tp3363
On 9/24/2011 3:09 AM, hadi wrote:
> I do not know how to search both cores and not define "shard"
> parameter,could you show me some solutions for solve my issue?
See this: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch
an you not use 'shard' parameter and specify both cores there?
>
>
>
> ___
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/two-cores-but-have-single-resul
On 9/23/2011 6:00 PM, hadi wrote:
> I index my files with solrj and crawl my sites with nutch 1.3 ,as you
> know, i have to overwrite the nutch schema on solr schema in order to
> have view the result in solr/browse, in this case i should define two
> cores,but i want have single result or the user
same time
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/two-cores-but-have-single-result-set-in-solr-tp3363043p3363133.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:03pm, hadi wrote:
> I have to cores with seprate schema and index but i want to have single
> result set in solr/browse,
If they have different schemas, how would you combine results from the two?
If they have the same schemas, then you can define a third core with a
diff