I'm slammed with stuff and have to leave for vacation Saturday morning
so I'll be going silent for a while, sorry
Best
Erick
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, didier deshommes wrote:
> Any idea on this? I still cannot get the combination of transient cores and
> transientCacheSize to work as
Any idea on this? I still cannot get the combination of transient cores and
transientCacheSize to work as I think it should: give me the ability to
create a large number cores and automatically load and unload them for me
based on a limit that I set.
If anyone else is using this feature and it is
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> The cores aren't loaded (or at least shouldn't be) for getting the status.
> The _names_ of the cores should be returned, but those are (supposed) to be
> retrieved from a list rather than loaded cores. So are you sure that's not
> what
> yo
The cores aren't loaded (or at least shouldn't be) for getting the status.
The _names_ of the cores should be returned, but those are (supposed) to be
retrieved from a list rather than loaded cores. So are you sure that's not what
you are seeing? How are you determining whether the cores are actual
Hi,
I've been very interested in the transient core feature of solr to manage a
large number of cores. I'm especially interested in this use case, that the
wiki lists at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores (looks to be down
now):
>loadOnStartup=false transient=true: This is really the use-case
