2:37 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: term position question from analyzer stack for
> WordDelimiterFilterFactory
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> I'm no WDFF expert, but all these zero look suspicious:
>
> org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFac
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: term position question from analyzer stack for
WordDelimiterFilterFactory
Hi Robert,
I'm no WDFF expert, but all these zero look suspicious:
org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory {preserveOriginal=0,
generateNumberParts=0, catenateWords=0, generateW
ucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Robert Petersen
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com
> Sent: Tue, April 26, 2011 4:39:49 PM
> Subject: RE: term position question from analyzer stack for
>WordDelimiterFilter
riginal Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 9:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: term position question from analyzer stack for
WordDelimiterFilterFactory
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Robert Peterse
l.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 9:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: term position question from analyzer stack for
WordDelimiterFilterFactory
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Robert Petersen
wrote:
> The search and index analyzer stack are the sam
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Robert Petersen wrote:
> The search and index analyzer stack are the same.
Ahhh, they should not be!
Using both generate and catenate in WDF at query time is a no-no.
Same reason you can't have multi-word synonyms at query time:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Analyz
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 5:55 PM
To: Robert Petersen
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: term position question from analyzer stack for
WordDelimiterFilterFactory
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Robert Petersen wrote:
> I can repeatedly demonstrate this in my dev environment, where I get
> entirely different results searching for AppleTV vs. appletv
You originally said "I cannot get a match between AppleTV on the
indexing side and appletv on the search si
this work... thanks for the help!
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 5:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: term position question from analyzer stack for
WordDelimiterFilterFactor
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Robert Petersen wrote:
> So if I don't put preserveOriginal=1 in my WordDelimiterFilterFactory
> settings I cannot get a match between AppleTV on the indexing side and
> appletv on the search side.
Hmmm, that shouldn't be the case. The "text" field in the solr
So if I don't put preserveOriginal=1 in my WordDelimiterFilterFactory settings
I cannot get a match between AppleTV on the indexing side and appletv on the
search side. Without that setting the all lowercase version of AppleTV is in
term position two due to the catenateWords=1 or the catenateAl
11 matches
Mail list logo