On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Matt Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Yonik. Should submit this as a bug ticket? Currently it's not a deal
> breaker as we're setting fl manually anyway.
Yes, please do.
-Yonik
gt; Hi Matt,
> >>
> >> You need to edit your solrconfig.xml and look for the word "word" in the
> >> dismax section of the config and change it to "spell".
> >>
> >> Otis
> >> --
> >> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucen
.xml and look for the word "word" in the
>> dismax section of the config and change it to "spell".
>>
>> Otis
>> --
>> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message ----
>> &
quot;.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Matt Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:08:43 PM
> >
ROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:08:43 PM
> Subject: strange difference between json and xml responses
>
> Hi,
>
> A while ago, we had a field called "word" which was used as a spelling
> field. We switched this to
Hi,
A while ago, we had a field called "word" which was used as a spelling
field. We switched this to "spell". When querying our solr instance with
just q=*:*, we get back the expected results. When querying our solr
instance with q=*:*&wt=json, we get this (below). When setting the qt to
dismax,
