PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:48 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: spellcheckhandler
On 26-Jan-08, at 5:51 PM, anuvenk wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for clearing my doubts. Would you know if the solr wiki
> is up to date with the documentation for the new features
On 26-Jan-08, at 5:51 PM, anuvenk wrote:
Thanks a lot for clearing my doubts. Would you know if the solr
wiki is up to
date with the documentation for the new features that are being
added? I
totally rely on the solr wiki documentation for my project. If you
may,
please send me the files
ics card" is a single
>> term (either because it is untokenized, or maybe because you use a
>> word-based ngram tokenfilter, etc...)
>>
>> alternately, if you want to get "graphics asdfghjk" as a suggestion for
>> "grapics asdfghjk" (even
tokenfilter, etc...)
>
> alternately, if you want to get "graphics asdfghjk" as a suggestion for
> "grapics asdfghjk" (even though "asdfghjk" isn't in your index at all),
> hiting the spellcorrection handler for each input word individually is
> probably yo
ot;asdfghjk" isn't in your index at all),
> hiting the spellcorrection handler for each input word individually is
> probably your best bet.
>
>
> : > You don't need to wait for 1.3 to be released - you can simply use a
> : > recent nightly build.
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spellcheckhandler-tp14627712p15100704.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;asdfghjk" isn't in your index at all),
> hiting the spellcorrection handler for each input word individually is
> probably your best bet.
>
>
> : > You don't need to wait for 1.3 to be released - you can simply use a
> : > recent nightly build.
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spellcheckhandler-tp14627712p15100704.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
: I did try with the latest nightly build and followed the steps outlined in
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
: with regards to creating new catchall field 'spell' of type 'spell' and
: copied my text fields to 'spell' at index time.
: Still q=grapics returns 'graphics'
:
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
> - Original Message
> From: anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:35:52 AM
> Subject: Re: spellcheckhandler
>
&g
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
> - Original Message
> From: anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:35:52 AM
> Subject: Re: spellcheckhandler
>
&g
ssage
> From: anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:35:52 AM
> Subject: Re: spellcheckhandler
>
>
> I followed the steps outlined in
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
> with reg
;
> - Original Message
> From: anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:35:52 AM
> Subject: Re: spellcheckhandler
>
>
> I followed the steps outlined in
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
&g
12:35:52 AM
Subject: Re: spellcheckhandler
I followed the steps outlined in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
with regards to setting up of the schema with a new field 'spell' and
copying other fields to this 'spell' field at index time.
It works fine with
ble to get spell check
results back for multi-word queries, should i wait for 1.3 release. If there
is any other option please educate me. In case a patch was already released,
how to add it to the current 1.2 version that i'm using?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sp
uvenk wrote:
>
> Is it possible to implement something like this with the spellcheckhandler
>
> Like how google does,..
>
> say i search for 'chater 13 bakrupcy',
>
> should be able to display these..
>
> did you search for 'chapter 13 bankruptcy
to the spellchecker in the
1.3-dev branch, so check there first.
jds
On Jan 4, 2008 7:15 PM, anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to implement something like this with the spellcheckhandler
>
> Like how google does,..
>
> say i search for 'chater 13
Is it possible to implement something like this with the spellcheckhandler
Like how google does,..
say i search for 'chater 13 bakrupcy',
should be able to display these..
did you search for 'chapter 13 bankruptcy'
Has someone been able to do this?
--
View this messa
16 matches
Mail list logo
