View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-Spatial-sorting-and-query-string-tp4084318p4085587.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t this result gets back on the first place because it's close to
> > Amsterdam(store2_geo). But normally, How can i know which one matched my
> > query as closest point? Is it possible to get this back? I can do it in
> my
> > application but with 200 stores in a doc i do
200 stores in a doc i don't think it's the best
> solution.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roy
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-Spatial-sorting-and-query-string-tp4084318p4084816.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ry as closest point? Is it possible to get this back? I can do it in my
application but with 200 stores i don't think it's the best solution.
Thanks,
Roy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-Spatial-sorting-and-query-string-tp4084318p4084795.html
Sen
tes pt=locatonlat,locationlong
>d=25}"
>
>It works great but my question is: Will it work quick and smooth with
>+1000
>stores in my store_coordinates field?
>
>Any help is appreciated
>Thanks,
>
>Roy
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-Spatial-sorting-and-query-string-
>tp4084318p4084521.html
>Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
n is: Will it work quick and smooth with +1000
stores in my store_coordinates field?
Any help is appreciated
Thanks,
Roy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-Spatial-sorting-and-query-string-tp4084318p4084521.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Great, it works very well. In solr 4.5 i will use geodist() again!
Thanks David
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-Spatial-sorting-and-query-string-tp4084318p4084487.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this in above solr request? When i add something to the
> "q=" it doesn't work. I tried _query_ subquery and other stuff but i don't
> get it working
>
> I appreciate any help,
> Thanks
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-ser
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-Spatial-sorting-and-query-string-tp4084318.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You were right, sloppy on my side. I replaced the %20 with & (in more than 1
place) and now it does work. Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/geodist-spatial-sorting-sort-param-could-not-be-parsed-as-a-query-and-is-not-a-field-that-exist
hat I have in my schema.xml:
> subFieldSuffix="_coordinate"/>
>
>
>
> stored="false"/>
> I've been checking this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch
> But that does not mention my error.
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/
olocation%20d=20}&q=*:*&start=0&rows=10&fl=id,title,city&facet.mincount=1&sort=geodist()%20asc
Here's what I have in my schema.xml:
I've been checking this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch
But that does not mention my error.
--
View this messag
Hi All,
This is more of an FYI for those wanting to filter and sort by distance, and
have the values returned in the result set after determining a way to do
this with existing code.
Using solr 4.0 an example query would contain the following parameters:
/select?
q=stevenage^0.0
+_val_:"ghhsin(
On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:45 AM, dan sutton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to filter and sort by distance with this URL:
>
> http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=*:*&fq={!sfilt%20fl=loc_lat_lon}&pt=52.02694,-0.49567&d=2&sort={!func}hsin(52.02694,-0.49567,loc_lat_lon_0_d,%20loc_lat_lon_1_d,3963.205)asc
Hi,
I'm trying to filter and sort by distance with this URL:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=*:*&fq={!sfilt%20fl=loc_lat_lon}&pt=52.02694,-0.49567&d=2&sort={!func}hsin(52.02694,-0.49567,loc_lat_lon_0_d,%20loc_lat_lon_1_d,3963.205)asc
Filtering is fine but it's failing in parsing the sort wi
15 matches
Mail list logo