On 6/12/2019 12:22 AM, Nikhil Reddy wrote:
I am setting up an elastic search engine using SOLR. I have few columns
where the datatype is VARCHAR(). The column in the result below(image
uploaded) is a alphanumric document ID. So when I use varchar as a
column datatype and ingest the data into so
Dear community members,
I am setting up an elastic search engine using SOLR. I have few columns
where the datatype is VARCHAR(). The column in the result below(image
uploaded) is a alphanumric document ID. So when I use varchar as a column
datatype and ingest the data into solr as shown in the bel
Hello,
I am doing Intersect query and I am getting unexpected results. Details
is below:
Below is the solr schema definition I am using for indexing polygons.
class="solr.SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType"
spatialContextFactory="com.spatial4j.core.context.jts.JtsSpatialContextFactory"
r of vehicles per maker in the city and in the
given price range (faceting).
I tried something like this (using solr grouping
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping):
I group the records with the same "vehicle_full_name" field ('group.field':
'v
r of vehicles per maker in the city and in the
given price range (faceting).
I tried something like this (using solr grouping
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping):
I group the records with the same "vehicle_full_name" field ('group.field':
'v
could override that filter. Or, do an application layer that
forces that filter to be added.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: cmd.ares
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 2:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: solr result handler??
I have a blacklist save some keywords
to filter the queryresult?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-handler-tp4155940.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
d.
>
> can you suggest me a way how to index a folder from my android application.
>
> thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/getting-direct-link-to-solr-result-tp4135084p4136266.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
my android application.
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/getting-direct-link-to-solr-result-tp4135084p4136266.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ndroid application, and I want to make the user get a
> direct link to the file he searched for.
>
> thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/getting-direct-link-to-solr-result-tp4135084.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
king on android application, and I want to make the user get a
direct link to the file he searched for.
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/getting-direct-link-to-solr-result-tp4135084.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Ups, I miswrote, it is omitHeader not omitHeaders
Please see : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#omitHeader
Ahmet
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:37 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
Hi Kishan,
Solr response already includes that info in QTime section. Aren't you seeing
it? If you
Hi Kishan,
Solr response already includes that info in QTime section. Aren't you seeing
it? If you don't see it try setting &omitHeaders=false
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:12 PM, Kishan Parmar wrote:
Hello,
how to get milliseconds result function in solr gives result in milliseconds
like
Hello,
how to get milliseconds result function in solr gives result in milliseconds
like
-->7 result found in 0.00456 milliseconds.
Regards,
Kishan Parmar
Software Developer
+91 95 100 77394
Jay Shree Krishnaa !!
That was it, I had to restart Solr for the schema changes to take effect
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-t-find-some-fields-in-solr-result-tp4099245p4099446.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, November 04, 2013 2:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can't find some fields in solr result
All fields are set to stored="true" in my schema.xml, and fl=* doesn't
change
the output of the response. I even checked the logs, no errors on any
fields.
-
All fields are set to stored="true" in my schema.xml, and fl=* doesn't change
the output of the response. I even checked the logs, no errors on any
fields.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-t-find-some-fields-in-solr-result-tp4099245p40
ge in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-t-find-some-fields-in-solr-result-tp4099245p4099249.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:19 PM, gohome190 wrote:
> I have a database that has about 25 fields for each entry. However, when I
> do a solr *:* query, I can only see the first 19 fields for each entry.
> However, I can successfully use the fields that don't show up as queries.
> So weird! Because t
Also, no errors in the Logging, and all fields are in the schema.xml.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-t-find-some-fields-in-solr-result-tp4099245p4099247.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;t sending them in
the response! Any ideas?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-t-find-some-fields-in-solr-result-tp4099245.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Try using facet.query on each part, you will get the number of total hits
for every OR.
If you need this info per document, the answers might appear when
specifying debug query=true.. If that info is useful, try adding
"[explain]" to fl param (probably requires registering the augmenter plugin
Hi,
My search queries to solr are of the following nature,
(A OR B OR C) OR (X AND Y AND Z) OR ((ABC AND DEF) - XYZ)
What I am trying to achieve is when I fire the query the results returned
should be able to tagged with which part or the OR resulted in the result. In
case all three parts above
t;
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restrict-change-numFound-solr-result-tp4075882p4076485.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Erick,
thanks for reply, I am doing the same thing already. But for paging
calculation i am depending on "numFound="120" value. That result i want
.()
thanks
aniljayanti
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restrict-change-numFo
ote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> thanks for reply,
>
> I have 540 records as a solr result. In that i want only 120 records
> (), based on the "numFound"
> node value i am calculating paging concept. i want to show 12 records per
> page then (120/12 = 10 pages) i would have 10
Hi Ralf,
thanks for reply,
I have 540 records as a solr result. In that i want only 120 records
(), based on the "numFound"
node value i am calculating paging concept. i want to show 12 records per
page then (120/12 = 10 pages) i would have 10 pages. Right. So i want that
scenario.
i take 12 record count
per page then i'll get 10 pages. (120/12 =10 pages). Please help.
thanks,
Aniljayanti.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restrict-change-numFound-solr-result-tp4075882p4076101.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
472066.n3.nabble.com/Restrict-change-numFound-solr-result-tp4075882.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rds are 540.
>
>
>
>
> 0
> 1
>
> *:*
> *120*
>
>
>
>
>green
>blue
>red
>
> .. (120 records)
>
>
>
>
> Please suggest me how to query to get desired numFou
t me how to query to get desired numFound records.
thanks in advance.
aniljayanti
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restrict-change-numFound-solr-result-tp4075882.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/Scalability-of-Solr-Result-Grouping-Field-Collapsing-Millions-Billions-of-documents-tp4002524p4017945.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Tom,
Feel free to find my benchmark results for two alternative joining
approaches.
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2012/08/block-join-query-performs.html
Regards
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Tom:
>
> I thin my comments were that grouping on a field where there was
> a u
Tom:
I thin my comments were that grouping on a field where there was
a unique value _per document_ chewed up a lot of resources.
Conceptually, there's a bucket for each unique group value. And
grouping on a file path is just asking for trouble.
But the memory used for grouping should max as a fu
Yes, distributed grouping works, but grouping takes a lot of
resources. If you can avoid in distributed mode, so much the better.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
> Thanks Tirthankar,
>
> So the issue in memory use for sorting. I'm not sure I understand how
> sorting of gr
Thanks Tirthankar,
So the issue in memory use for sorting. I'm not sure I understand how
sorting of grouping fields is involved with the defaults and field
collapsing, since the default sorts by relevance not grouping field. On
the other hand I don't know much about how field collapsing is impl
Hi Lance and Tirthankar,
We are currently using Solr 3.6. I tried a search across our current 12
shards grouping by book id (record_no in our schema) and it seems to work
fine (the query with the actual urls for the shards changed is appended
below.)
I then searched for the record_no of the seco
Hi Tirthankar,
Can you give me a quick summary of what won't work and why?
I couldn't figure it out from looking at your thread. You seem to have a
different issue, but maybe I'm missing something here.
Tom
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Tirthankar Chatterjee <
tchatter...@commvault.com> wr
nt work, see my thread on Solr3.6 Field collapsing
> > Thanks,
> > Tirthankar
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tom Burton-West
> > Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:39:25
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Reply-To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.o
olr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Cc: William Dueber; Phillip Farber
> Subject: Scalability of Solr Result Grouping/Field Collapsing:
> Millions/Billions of documents?
>
> Hello all,
>
> We are thinking about using Solr Field Collapsing on a rather large scale
> and wonder if
Solr3.6 Field collapsing
> Thanks,
> Tirthankar
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Burton-West
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:39:25
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Reply-To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Cc: William Dueber; Phillip Farber
> Subject:
This wont work, see my thread on Solr3.6 Field collapsing
Thanks,
Tirthankar
-Original Message-
From: Tom Burton-West
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:39:25
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Reply-To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Cc: William Dueber; Phillip Farber
Subject: Scalabili
Hello all,
We are thinking about using Solr Field Collapsing on a rather large scale
and wonder if anyone has experience with performance when doing Field
Collapsing on millions of or billions of documents (details below. ) Are
there performance issues with grouping large result sets?
Details:
W
gine-
>> De : Eric Grobler [mailto:impalah...@googlemail.com]
>> Envoyé : lundi 12 septembre 2011 11:00
>> À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Objet : Re: Document row in solr Result
>>
>> Hi Manish,
>>
>> Thank you for your time.
>>
>>
lemail.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 12 septembre 2011 11:00
> À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Document row in solr Result
>
> Hi Manish,
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
> For upselling reasons I want to inform the customer that:
> "your product is on the last
helps,
Pierre
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Grobler [mailto:impalah...@googlemail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 12 septembre 2011 11:00
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Document row in solr Result
Hi Manish,
Thank you for your time.
For upselling reasons I want to inform the cus
Hi Manish,
Thank you for your time.
For upselling reasons I want to inform the customer that:
"your product is on the last page of the search result. However, click here
to put your product back on the first page..."
Here is an example:
I have a phone with productid 635001 in the iphone categor
You might not be able to find the row index.
Can you post your query in detail. The kind of inputs and outputs you are
expecting.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Eric Grobler wrote:
> Hi Manish,
>
> Thanks for your reply - but how will that return me the row index of the
> original query.
>
> Re
Hi Manish,
Thanks for your reply - but how will that return me the row index of the
original query.
Regards
Ericz
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Manish Bafna wrote:
> fq -> filter query parameter searches within the results.
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Grobler >wrote:
>
> > Hi
fq -> filter query parameter searches within the results.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Grobler wrote:
> Hi Solr experts,
>
> If you have a site with products sorted by submission date, the product of
> a
> customer might be on page 1 on the first day, and then move down to page x
> as ot
Hi Solr experts,
If you have a site with products sorted by submission date, the product of a
customer might be on page 1 on the first day, and then move down to page x
as other customers submit newer entries.
To find the row of a product you can of course run the query and loop
through the resul
Try LucidImagination's KStemmer
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-problem-tp2746849p2747106.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is there any other filter which can solved my singular plural problem?
Anurag
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-problem-tp2746849p2746956.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:41 AM, anurag.walia wrote:
> it will be polymers but result will come different in case of polymer and
> polymers (singular/plural).
> or there can be more words like polymer.
[...]
Your only alternative then is to implement a filter that works the
way you want it to.
it will be polymers but result will come different in case of polymer and
polymers (singular/plural).
or there can be more words like polymer.
Regards
Anurag Walia
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-problem-tp2746849p2746947.html
Sent from the Solr
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, anurag.walia wrote:
> Hi Gora,
>
> Thanks for relied.
>
> i applied this snowballporterfilterfactory for remove difference of result
> in case of plural or singular.
> if i entered polymer then it working fine but again polymers giving me
> "polym".
> while bag o
lease find the screen shot.
Regards
Anurag Walia http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n2746902/solr2.jpg
solr2.jpg
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-problem-tp2746849p2746902.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:46 AM, anurag.walia wrote:
[...]
> I have a problem with number of character in Term Text . I entered
> "Polymer" but after snowballporterfilterfactory it become "Polym" while it
> was not exist in "protwords.txt" file . I want if any word does not exist in
> "protwords.
ile it
was not exist in "protwords.txt" file . I want if any word does not exist in
"protwords.txt" Term Text should be whole world like "Polymer"
Regards
Anurag Walia
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-problem-tp2746
Hi Lance,
I actually copied tika exceptions in one html file and indexed
it. It is just a content of a file and here i tell u what i mean::
if i post a query like *java* then the result or response from solr should
hit only a part of the content like as follows::
http://localhost:
I'm not quite sure what Tika exceptions mean in this context.
You can give the 'fl=field1,field2' option to only return some fields in
a query.
You can get google-like results using highlighting and 'snippetizing'.
These are documented on the wiki.
satya swaroop wrote:
Hi ,
Can the resu
Hi ,
Can the result of solr show the only a part of the content of a
document that got in the result.
example
if i send a query for to search tika then the result should be as follows:::
-
0
79
-
-
text/html
1html
-
-
Apache Tomcat/6.0.26 - Error reportHTT
e-
From: Ranveer [mailto:ranveer.s...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: display solr result in JSP
Hi,
very simple to display value in jsp. if you are using solrj then simply
store value in bean from java class and can display.
same
Hi,
very simple to display value in jsp. if you are using solrj then simply
store value in bean from java class and can display.
same thing you can do in servlet too.. get the solr server response and
return in bean or can display directly(in servlet).
hope you will able to do.
regards
Ranvee
I am new for solr. Just got example xml file index and search by following solr
tutorial. I wonder how I can get the search result display in a JSP. I really
appreciate any suggestions you can give.
Thanks so much,
Xiaohui
Hi,
You are using the dismax request handler, which only accepts a simple
string in the q parameter, you can't specify other fields in it that
way. In any case, using filter queries (fq) as suggested by Indika
Tantrigoda is a better option as these are cached separately which is
quite useful
Thanks Indika, that looks good. I'll look at the article.
If anyone else has any good ideas please send them too.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Indika Tantrigoda wrote:
> Hi Dhanushka,
>
> Have you tried to use the filter query parameter.
> Check out this article, the Applying Constraints sec
Hi Dhanushka,
Have you tried to use the filter query parameter.
Check out this article, the Applying Constraints section should be helpful
to you.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Articles/Faceted-Search-Solr
Solr Wiki link to filter query parameter
http://wiki.apac
Thanks for the reply. I was just giving the above as an example.
Something as simple as following is also not working.
/select/?q=france+fDepartmentName:History&version=2.2&
So it looks like the query parameter syntax I'm using is wrong.
This is the params array I'm getting from the result.
10
0
Try adding quotes to your query:
DepartmentName:Chemistry+fSponsor:\"US Cancer/Diabetic Research Institute\"
The parser will split on whitespace
Tommy Chheng
Programmer and UC Irvine Graduate Student
Twitter @tommychheng
http://tommy.chheng.com
On 3/29/10 8:49 AM, Dhanushka Samarakoon wrot
Hi,
I'm trying to perform a search based on keywords and then reduce the result
set based on facets that user selects.
First query for a search would look like this.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=cancer+stem&version=2.2&wt=php&start=&rows=10&indent=on&qt=dismax&facet=on&facet.mincount=1&fa
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:55 AM, arno13 wrote:
> Do you know if it's possible to writing solr results directly on a hard disk
> from server side and not to use an HTTP connection to transfer the results?
If you have something like a CSV file (or any other file type that
Solr accepts over HTTP), y
when you have lot of 'rows'.
>>>> For instance for 10'000 rows, the query time could be 50 ms and 19s to
>>>> get
>>>> the results from the server. As my client and server are on the same
>>>> system,
>>>> I could get th
7;000 rows, the query time could be 50 ms and 19s to
>>> get
>>> the results from the server. As my client and server are on the same
>>> system,
>>> I could get the results faster directly on the hard disk (or better in a
>>> ram
>>> disk), is it p
> the results from the server. As my client and server are on the same
>> system,
>> I could get the results faster directly on the hard disk (or better in a
>> ram
>> disk), is it possible configuring solr for that?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>
server. As my client and server are on the same system,
> I could get the results faster directly on the hard disk (or better in a ram
> disk), is it possible configuring solr for that?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://w
isk), is it possible configuring solr for that?
Regards,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-writing-solr-result-on-disk-from-the-server-side--tp23428509p23428509.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
tible wilt
> solr 1.2.
> Regards,
> Rinesh
>
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rinesh1
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>I wanted some inputs on the solr result xml.
> >>Curr
Hi Shalin,
Yes I am using java.
I am using solr 1.2 ..As per my knowledge solrJ is not compatible wilt
solr 1.2.
Regards,
Rinesh
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rinesh1 wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>I wanted some in
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rinesh1 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I wanted some inputs on the solr result xml.
>Currently the result obtained will be of the format
>
>
> attrResult1
> attrResult2
>
>
>Is it possible
Hi,
I wanted some inputs on the solr result xml.
Currently the result obtained will be of the format
attrResult1
attrResult2
Is it possible some how to change it to the form
attrResult1
attrResult2
The reason why I am
On Dec 5, 2007 3:06 PM, Owens, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> surely the term offsets are returned when a search is done on a field with
> that data available?
Nope.
That data isn't even stored in the index unless you store termvectors
with that info... and even in that case the info is more
Hello again,
So I've been concentrating on hacking the Util/Highlighting.java to see if I
could get it to output the results offsets I need to do the highlighting I
need. It turns out that this method requires that the field be stored as well
as indexed. I would like to be able to just set term
83 matches
Mail list logo
